Tuesday, April 18, 2006
Welcome, Visitor No. 1000(ish)
After a mere 4 months, this lil' blog's hit a whopping 1000 visitors. Roughly speaking. Anyone who has sm3.sitemeter.com redirected in their hosts file or whose browser doesn't load images won't be counted (a category that also includes search engine bots). Populating your hosts file to block unwanted sites is actually a really smart idea. It's not the end-all and be-all of security, by any means, but it does get rid of a lot of banner ads. Also, I didn't have that hit counter set up for about the first week or so, so I've got no record at all of my very earliest visitors. Oh, well. The number's probably correct to within an order of magnitude or two, anyway. So an enthusiastic "huzzah!" may be in order.
I'd like to thank the academy, and all the little people who made this possible (you know who you are). Oh, and my agent, if I had one. I'd just like to say that this humble blog's come a long way since the early days, although that's not really true as far as I can tell. I'd also like to express my sincerest hopes for an ever-brighter and more wondrous future for this thing. Really, it's probably just going to be more of the same, day in and day out. OTOH it's been four long months so far, and I haven't gotten bored with blogging yet, which I think has got to be some kind of personal record for me.
I probably ought to give out some sort of prize to the 1000th visitor, but I don't have any bright ideas about what it ought to be, plus I'm too cheap to actually do it. Talking about it is absolutely free, though, so long as you don't try to put a dollar figure on the amount of time wasted, both mine and yours. I think I'll go with a line from an obscure 80's radio commercial (don't ask me why I've remembered it), and say in a really bad French accent, "You ween a zmall, but beauuuutiful potato!". I don't actually have a potato handy (too cheap, remember?), so in lieu of that here's a link to Global Potato News. Seriously. And there's more news than you might expect.
If the winner doesn't like potatoes, perhaps he or she would prefer a neutral Bs meson. They do exist, according to that PhysicsWeb article, though I'm not sure whether I personally own any or not. They're awfully small, see, and they move kind of quickly, plus they don't hang around very long before decaying. So maybe they aren't really a great gift item, come to think of it.
And now I've completely run out of ideas for prizes. That didn't take long.
Anyway, the picture up top is of a giant grouper, taken by NOAA researchers near the island of Agrihan in the Northern Marianas. Yes, the obscure US territory you might have heard of in connection with that Abramoff guy. It all comes back to politics sooner or later, I'm afraid.
Monday, April 17, 2006
Today's imperiled charismatic megafauna
- Baby Walruses [pic 1, from WHOI]
- Desert Pygmy Owls [pic 2, from USFWS]
- Turtles in Colombia
- Mermaids
Please note that I'm trying valiantly to be "fair and balanced" here. We can shake our fists at the Bushies for the first two, since we all know how much they love greedy developers and big CO2 polluters. And come to think of it, they're probably not too fond of mermaids either.
But Georgie may be on the side of the angels on the remaining item. I'm confident he'd be staunchly opposed to turtle-based aphrodisiacs in any form. That is, unless there's money in it for a large pharmaceutical conglomerate.
Updated: Yet another article about overfishing. Let me go out on a limb and predict that the current overfishing of tuna, sharks, etc., will continue unabated until the fishieries collapse and there's no more money to be made. That's what always happens.
Here's the latest huge carnivorous dinosaur, newly discovered in Argentina. Oh, and they may have hunted in packs. Gaaaah!
Oh, and while I was checking for dinosaur news, I came across two good articles about Republicans (big surprise): "Conservatism is a mental disease" and "The Price We'll Pay for Countenancing Presidential Omnipotence".
And one final political item: A poster over on the SCOX board shared this cute "What, Dubya Worry?" video clip [MPEG]. It's supposed to be a morph effect, but I have to say the beginning and end pics look pretty much identical to me. But then, I'm way overdue for an optometrist checkup, so what do I know?
Enjoy!
Labels:
animals
Friday, April 14, 2006
foo
A few unrelated items I've accumulated for today.
- In a recent post of mine (GWB: Double or Nothing), I sort of tried to suggest that the neocons' current designs on Iran were akin to compulsive problem gambling behavior. I've since come across an article over at Whiskey Bar which makes this point far, far better than I did. Read "The Flight Forward" and be afraid. Be very afraid.
- Need a breather? Here are two MSM cute animal stories. First, an NY Times story about why the city goes bonkers for dramatic cat rescues.
- Also, a pair of crows are nesting outside the Guardian's offices.
- Cute animal stuff is the closest I get to celebrating Easter. But I think someone's finally figured out how to do it right. The Portland Mercury lets us know that the Sabala's Mt. Tabor club up on Hawthorne is doing a special screening of The Passion of the Christ, accompanied by the music of Slayer. Ooooohhhh...
- Two other Easter perspective, if you care: a mythological/anthropological interpretation, which is somewhat interesting (though I don't buy into all that Joseph Campbell silliness), and the inevitable absolute literal historical truth angle.
- If you (like me) find the US's current grim blood-n-guts approach to Easter kind of icky and offputting, here's a small breath of fresh air: Some pics from an easter egg hunt at a recently-renovated park in Geneva, Switzerland. Previous posts at that blog detail the ongoing renovation efforts.
- And some Easter photos from a Polish blogger visiting the Netherlands.
- Ok, breather's over, back to politics again. What's it going to take to finally impeach Bush? Here's one great idea. Volunteers, anyone?
- On a vastly more serious note, The Nation has an article by Kevin Phillips, based on his new book American Theocracy, which I've mentioned a couple of times before. Truly frightening, all the more so because he's not writing in the near-hysterical mode we get so used to on the net (and to which I myself am prone on occasion). At the very start, he explains that we aren't heading for an all-out revival of Calvinist Geneva, but the things that are possible are scary on their own. I don't usually run out and buy the controversial political book of the moment, but this time I may have to.
- Is a Jamaican theocracy in the works, too? Two scary articles suggest it's already well on its way. People in the US tend not to realize that much of the Caribbean is deeply religious and conservative, I guess probably because they only ever talk to their fellow cruise passengers and avoid interacting with the locals at all costs.
- As a non-churchgoing state, Oregon's usually not fertile ground for the theocrats, but at least one of the leading Republican candidates for governor thinks we ought to start teaching creationism in the schools. And the scary part is that this'll probably play extremely well with voters in the May primary. And the R's keep wondering why they keep losing general elections in this state. Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course.
- One endlessly fascinating bit about right-wingers is that they'd love a theocracy so long as their own religion gets to be in charge, but they absolutely freak out at the prospect of living under someone else's theocracy. And then they turn around and fantasize happily about those other evildoin' theocrats coming here and blowing up liberals. Truly disgusting.
- And thanks to the magic of the internet, we learn that there are creationists in India, as well. Who knew? The article seems to assume readers already know what a "Cosmo Theorist" is, and I'm afraid I don't.
- And a couple of perspectives on the current Rumsfeld controversy. from Political Cortex, and the ever-brilliant Jon Swift. I actually think the anti-Rumsfeld campaign is pointless, maybe even counterproductive. His replacement would just be another chickenhawk neocon, just as bad or even worse than the current guy. There's zero chance of getting a moderate, non-divisive defense secretary so long as Bush & Cheney run the show. Zero. Replacing the current guy would make it look as though something positive had been accomplished, and that's how the media would spin it. And then nothing would actually improve or change in any way. Any attempt to mitigate the sheer badness of the current administration is doomed to failure, and it's pointless and counterproductive to even try. Why help them rearrange the deck chairs? The new chickenhawk would just get a fresh grace period in which to screw up over and over again without being criticized for it, and that's the last thing we need right now.
- Switching gears completely, here are some cool new Mars pictures from MRO.
- Returning to cute animals for just a moment, here's today's tiny tidbit of echidna news. Awwwwww.....
- Here's someone's list of the Top 18 skylines in the world. This was going to go into either one of my recent art-related posts, or something about Dubai (since it's one of the 18) but it didn't fit anywhere, so here it is.
- Meanwhile, fresh off the Dubai ports deal, we find out that a Kuwaiti company's buying a minority stake in Krispy Kreme Donuts.
- I'm actually ok with that, though. I'm not a Krispy Kreme fan. If you're looking for good donuts in the greater Portland area, I recommend Donut Day in Aloha. I should add that the owners are immigrants from (I think) Lebanon. And they're wonderful people.
Thursday, April 13, 2006
Venus Vortex
The first images from ESA's Venus Express are now available. The top pic here is a near-IR image of the funky, swirling clouds over the planet's south pole.
For the sake of comparison, the second pic is of the south pole of Saturn (more pics here), and the third is a bunch of swirly lollipops. Note that the lollipops appear to swirl in the opposite direction as the Venusian clouds, although the significance of this (if any) is as yet unknown.
Magellan images of Venus' north pole can be found here. Apparently there's a swirling cloud vortex at the north pole as well, but I haven't been able to find any images of it.
Also, live pictures of our own south pole can be found here. Well, ok, it's dark there right now, but you get the idea.
Enjoy!
tags: venus venus express saturn lollipops
Labels:
space
Missing Links
Today's biology and/or politics tidbits.
tags = australopithecus tiktaalik Himantura kittipongi missing link creationism intelligent design evolution fundies
- Some are calling Australopithecus anamensis a "missing link" between early hominids and more apelike ancestors. The researchers' paper is here.
- In some ways the creationists have it really easy. If you dispense with the notion of evidence-based empirical proof, you can work really, really fast. Here are two articles announcing that they've already "debunked" Tiktaalik, just days after it was announced. Those poor saps in the fact-based biology community often take years or even decades to come up with "conclusive results" like those.
- Luckily, however, detonating the fundies' so-called rebuttals doesn't take decades, or years, or even days. Minutes, is more like it. Here are two examples.
- National Geographic has an article about a type of catfish that likes to crawl out of the water and hunt on dry land. The researchers say this helps show that water-to-land adaptations are really not that complex or difficult. I just say "Yikes!".
- That article links to a good essay titled "Was Darwin Wrong?".
- An article over at Political Cortex: War of the Worldviews: The Religious Right vs. Democratic Pluralism
- Meet Himantura kittipongi, a newly discovered freshwater stingray(!) that lives in the Mekong River. Newly discovered, but already considered endangered. You hear that a lot these days.
- The latest Laonastes update. Seems the locals consider them rather tasty.
- The fundies are claiming that a professor at Cornell will be teaching a pro-ID class in the near future. Well, except that he isn't, really, so don't freak out. His blog is here. You may or may not agree with the reasoning, but it should be obvious that he's not one of "them", and the ID folks are (as usual) misrepresenting what's really going on. Be sure to read his article arguing there's an evolutionary connection between religion and warfare.
- More creationism in Kentucky.
- Believe it or not, we're now seeing creationism controversies popping up in Canada and the UK. And here I always thought they were both such reasonable countries...
- A blog post titled Tiktaalik is putting the WIN back in Darwin. Great title, great post, and it even comes with a picture of cute baby animals. What more could you ask for?
tags = australopithecus tiktaalik Himantura kittipongi missing link creationism intelligent design evolution fundies
Wednesday, April 12, 2006
A Taco for Lenin
Another picture from Seattle, this time of the Lenin statue that graces the Fremont neighborhood, right in front of the local Taco del Mar. The statue's presence inspires frothing-at-the-mouth rage from the usual quarters, naturally. Do conservatives just have no sense of irony at all? Yes, we all realize he was a bad guy, ok? You'd think that just living here in the irony-soaked, angst-ridden Northwest, at least a very teentsy amount would've rubbed off on them, but apparently not. I mean, the local merchants (capitalist running dogs that they are) decorate Vladimir Ilich for Christmas. In that Christmas article, a local gelato shop owner remarks that she first thought it was a statue of Ivar, the local clam chowder baron. Which, quite honestly, is what I thought at first too. A giant bronze Lenin statue is not exactly the sort of thing you go around expecting to see every day. At least in this country, and in this day and age.
In Budapest, there's an entire outdoor museum devoted to old Socialist Realist sculptures discarded after 1989. I have to admit I rather like some of the statues done in this style. Your art history professor will scoff, of course. I personally think the art world's scorn for all things Soviet is primarily due to aesthetic trendiness, not ideology. While the outside art world had moved on to increasingly abstract and esoteric works, comprehensible only to an elect few, the Soviets stuck with their own brand of romanticized neoclassicism, in art, architecture, music, and literature. In the Western art world, being seen as stodgy and outdated is far worse than being ideologically suspect, so the entire creative output of a very large country was lumped in with the likes of Norman Rockwell, Rogers & Hammerstein, and Thomas Kinkade. It seems to me this is a rather harsh and unfair judgement. Sooner or later a major museum will do a "groundbreaking" show, and there'll be a critical reevaluation, and prices of old Soviet statues will go through the roof. Mark my words. Not next year, and probably not in the next five or ten, but sometime within our lifetimes, I think we'll see it.
Meanwhile, the Financial Times has a great article about the ambivalent legacy of 20th century modernism, in response to a new show at the V&A Museum in London. It'd be interesting to go travel a couple of centuries into the future and see what stuff from the 20th century turned out to have staying power in the long term and what didn't. I think the results would be surprising, although I wouldn't dare to guess about the particulars.
It's not like most of the art created in the West during the last hundred years or so has been all that fantastic. The last 50 or so, in particular, have produced some great works, and literally tons of absolute crap. I'm not one of those people who freak out about abstract art and sculpture, and I think some of it can be quite nice. There's even a small amount of modern classical music out there that I'd consider to be "nice". But it's rare for a modern artwork to elicit a stronger reaction than that, and quite a few simply get dismissed without evoking any sort of feeling or response at all. This is fine in an art museum; different works will strike different people in different ways, and all that. However, if you're going to plunk a sculpture down in a park or public square, I'd argue that you have additional obligations toward the general (i.e. non-art-major) public. Presumably it's supposed to be there for everyone, not just an in-crowd elite, so you should at least try to make the work appealing to a broader cross-section of society. There's a limit to how much aggressively ugly modernism the public should be asked to put up with. I don't care what the experts say, Rusting Chunks #5 is not a real improvement over a grouping of heroic steelworkers and peasants striding into the glorious future. Yes, a world of nothing but endless worker-and-peasant statues would be monotonous, to say the least, but an occasional one here and there would be nice, just to spice things up.
You'd have to adapt the style to local conditions, of course. No Lenins (Fremont notwithstanding), and most likely no hammers-and-sickles. I mean, nobody actually wants to live in a totalitarian society with a broken Leninist command economy, except perhaps the president of Belarus, and he's a complete lunatic. You could possibly get away with a statue of John Reed, since he was originally from Portland and all. (I've heard there's a park bench dedicated to him somewhere around town, but I don't know where it is, if it exists.) For the most part, though, you'd have a lot of burly, square-jawed loggers, cowboys, and fishermen. I recall having seen at least one example of a Soviet statue of heroic engineers, and I'd obviously be ok with that. Heck, I'd even model for one, if I was asked nicely.
Labels:
food
,
photos
,
seattle
,
washington
Tuesday, April 11, 2006
Not Very Strong Swimmers
Here are a couple of fun photos of freakish fish, taken at the Seattle Aquarium the other day. You can probably tell why I don't take photos for a living. Neither of these fish are very strong swimmers, so at least they held still for the camera, more or less.
The first is a cowfish, and the second is the Northwest's very own Pacific spiny lumpsucker. No, seriously, that's its real name. Honest. Oregon Magazine has a bit more about the spiny lumpsucker here, and there's a good Wikipedia article as well. Also, here's a WP article about Tetraodontiformes, an entire order of smallish and very droll fishes including cowfishes, pufferfishes (=fugu), and much, much more.
While we're on the subject, the third image is a drawing of the recently discovered Tiktaalik roseae, which looks an awful lot like a transitional form between fish and land animals. (I'm guessing it wasn't a very strong swimmer either.) You've heard of transitional forms, right? You know, the thing the creationists keep insisting doesn't exist. D'oh! If you're a hardcore Tiktaalik fan, CafePress already has a line of T. roseae casualwear.
The image links to a good story over at Pharyngula, and The Lancelet also has a good story. If you're a Nature subscriber, you can find the researchers' original articles here.
The creationists beg to differ about Tiktaalik, of course, and they'd like to offer a bit of lame and ignorant criticism of the new beastie. Another fine example of their usual faith-based "reasoning".
A good post over at HinesSight proclaims this to have been a bad week for creationism, with Tiktaalik just the tip of the iceberg. The Panda's Thumb also suggests this has not been a good week for the ID camp. Not to be outdone, a couple of posts at Scientific American's science blog call it a lousy week for creationism, giving even more reasons why this is so. The biggest reason, of course, is the new molecular evolution study, which in the end is probably a bigger (though less accessible) story than Tiktaalik, even. It may be worth noting that the lead researcher on the study is a professor at the University of Oregon.
I'd like to take things a step further and label this a truly crappy week for creationism, and more generally for the notion there are things that only religion can explain and science can't touch. Today comes a new report indicating that near-death experiences may have a purely biological basis. So much for the whole "move towards the light" thing.
Oh, and fundies in Kentucky are freaking out over efforts to replace "A.D." ("Anno Domini") with "C.E." ("Common Era") in general usage, which also seems to have some sort of murky connection with evolution, as well. At least they seem to think so. I was at the Portland Art Museum last week, and noticed that they've begun using C.E. in their exhibits. There's a sign explaining C.E. vs. A.D. in their current exhibit of Han dynasty objects. Not really the best explanation I've seen, since I think they were trying to be overly tactful and avoid criticizing the religious basis of "A.D.". Instead they just argued that "C.E." is newer, and it's the trend these days.
Also, here's a good article arguing that if you're a genuine ID true believer, you ought to witness for your faith by not getting a flu shot ever again, and most definitely not for the bird flu, since in order to pose a threat to humans, the H5N1 virus will need to evolve a bit more, which is "impossible", according to the usual ID wingnuts.
But not all the news is bad in Jesustan this week. Remember that one-eyed "cyclops" kitten that was in the news a few months back? Apparently the creationists have gotten their grubby hands on the remains, and the poor thing will soon be a new attraction at a roadside fundie freakshow in Syracuse, NY. (Don't worry, the link does not have a picture of the kitten, which you probably really don't want to see.) Either the fundies don't understand the difference between a genetic mutation and a birth defect, or they're deliberately trying to confuse the issue, or quite probably a bit of both.
Updated: Creationism is near the top of the list of things You Must Believe to be a Republican.
Also, you might enjoy Jane Smiley's recent posting titled "Tolerance", or Social Control?, about the larger secular vs. fundie conflict. I'll probably link to this story again, since placing it as an addendum near the end of an existing mostly-unrelated post doesn't do it justice.
And here's an interesting, rambling blog post speculating about the progressive/conservative divide and related matters. This is a great line: "This was going to be a post about something else. My posts never do what i want them to do.". I know the feeling. I really do.
More: A couple more related items worth reading: Tangled Bank #51: the Seattle Tour! and Does gravity explain why basketballs fall down?.
tagz: cowfish spiny lumpsucker tiktaalik evolution creationism intelligent design oregon
Labels:
animals
,
aquarium
,
seattle
,
washington
Monday, April 10, 2006
GWB: Double or Nothing
So GWB now admits he, ah, declassified the infamous Plame/Yellowcake material. And of course the usual suspects are rushing to let us all know that it was all technically legal, since the president's a law unto himself and all.
It's quite gratifying to see conservatives jumping in with these legalistic, hair-splitting arguments, quibbling over what the definition of "is" is. We may as well dispute the legality a bit, just to make them keep offering these lame excuses. But it's actually not a completely outrageous idea, so let's assume it's true, purely for the sake of argument. I don't see any realistic prospect of GWB ever being held legally accountable for any of his actions, so arguing over legality is a purely theoretical exercise, anyway.
The R's would like to only talk about the letter of the law, and they'd rather not have a conversation about whether the disclosure was ethical, or politically wise, or good for national security, or the sort of conduct we ought to expect from presidents. Well, George sort of took a stab at that today, arguing that he wanted the country to "see the truth" and so forth, but this argument is unconvincing even by his usual standards.
The problem, of course, is that the Niger yellowcake story had already been discredited at the time George leaked it, so it's not clear what connection there is here with the public "seeing the truth". Maybe Bush still believes it, for all we know. Someone ought to have asked him today. It sure sounds like the usual "conservative relativism" we've come to know and love so much, where truth is just any crazy notion you choose to believe, regardless of the evidence (e.g. creationism), and falsehood is anything you happen to disagree with for whatever reason.
I suppose you could argue that there's no way national security could be harmed by releasing a completely fictional tale about African uranium, since no real secrets are being disclosed. We'll probably hear this argument before long.
Meanwhile, George's next war is starting to take shape. No doubt you've already heard about Seymour Hersh's New Yorker story discussing a possible US attack on Iran in the near future. If the account is accurate at all, the most, ahem, striking thing about it is how similar it is to the Iraq plan. The military particulars are different -- instead of a massive ground invasion, we'd apparently stage a huge air attack against Iran, with no advance warning, a la Pearl Harbor. Aside from that, though, it's like deja vu all over again. The Iranian public, apparently, will greet us as liberators, even if we nuke their country a little here and there. We'll get us a second helping of that tasty regime change, and then we roll the credits. Mission accomplished! The article also asserts we've already got covert operations in place, trying to stoke interethnic tensions in Iran. Fortunately there's absolutely no chance there could be any possible downside to this, certainly not after the regime change happens. Because then the country will be an absolute paradise (well, except for all the radiation). Or at least nobody's thought that far ahead. So long as you avoid ever asking "What happens once we win?", there's no need to have an answer, right? Look at Iraq. Three years on, and we're still making amazing, remarkable progress every single day. Bush and Cheney keep saying so, so you know it must be true. And what's all this crazy "exit strategy" nonsense you hippies keep babbling on about? What part of "mission accomplished" don't you understand?
The current WH spin is that they'd maybe kinda prefer a diplomatic solution. Which, again, is exactly what they said about Iraq. And yes, there were diplomatic efforts. They just weren't good faith diplomatic efforts. They were designed to fail, so that war would appear to be the only remaining option. Some people might argue that threating people with nuclear annihilation is just a really shrewd negotiating tactic. Maybe it is, and maybe it isn't. There's a fine line between taking a hard line to push negotiations along, and taking a hard line to poison any chance of a deal. You see the latter a lot in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with each side pairing a negotiating track with a parallel track of sucide bombings or forcible land confiscations. And we all know how well that's worked out over the years. I'm convinced Bush & Cheney won't settle for anything other than a war. We'll be told that the Iranian leadership is untrustworthy (the complete opposite of our own leaders), fanatical (again, totally unlike Bush & Cheney), and an imminent threat to world peace (once again... you get the idea).
Hersh quotes sources as saying Bush now sees Iran as his presidential legacy. Which again is what was being said about Iraq a few years ago. That one didn't turn out so well, so we're going to try to change the subject and not talk about it anymore, or think about it, or learn anything from any mistakes that may have been made. Instead we're just going to pick a new country, place another high-stakes bet, and roll the dice again. Double or nothing.
Updated: Read this great rant titled Is Your Entire Country on Crack?.
It's quite gratifying to see conservatives jumping in with these legalistic, hair-splitting arguments, quibbling over what the definition of "is" is. We may as well dispute the legality a bit, just to make them keep offering these lame excuses. But it's actually not a completely outrageous idea, so let's assume it's true, purely for the sake of argument. I don't see any realistic prospect of GWB ever being held legally accountable for any of his actions, so arguing over legality is a purely theoretical exercise, anyway.
The R's would like to only talk about the letter of the law, and they'd rather not have a conversation about whether the disclosure was ethical, or politically wise, or good for national security, or the sort of conduct we ought to expect from presidents. Well, George sort of took a stab at that today, arguing that he wanted the country to "see the truth" and so forth, but this argument is unconvincing even by his usual standards.
The problem, of course, is that the Niger yellowcake story had already been discredited at the time George leaked it, so it's not clear what connection there is here with the public "seeing the truth". Maybe Bush still believes it, for all we know. Someone ought to have asked him today. It sure sounds like the usual "conservative relativism" we've come to know and love so much, where truth is just any crazy notion you choose to believe, regardless of the evidence (e.g. creationism), and falsehood is anything you happen to disagree with for whatever reason.
I suppose you could argue that there's no way national security could be harmed by releasing a completely fictional tale about African uranium, since no real secrets are being disclosed. We'll probably hear this argument before long.
Meanwhile, George's next war is starting to take shape. No doubt you've already heard about Seymour Hersh's New Yorker story discussing a possible US attack on Iran in the near future. If the account is accurate at all, the most, ahem, striking thing about it is how similar it is to the Iraq plan. The military particulars are different -- instead of a massive ground invasion, we'd apparently stage a huge air attack against Iran, with no advance warning, a la Pearl Harbor. Aside from that, though, it's like deja vu all over again. The Iranian public, apparently, will greet us as liberators, even if we nuke their country a little here and there. We'll get us a second helping of that tasty regime change, and then we roll the credits. Mission accomplished! The article also asserts we've already got covert operations in place, trying to stoke interethnic tensions in Iran. Fortunately there's absolutely no chance there could be any possible downside to this, certainly not after the regime change happens. Because then the country will be an absolute paradise (well, except for all the radiation). Or at least nobody's thought that far ahead. So long as you avoid ever asking "What happens once we win?", there's no need to have an answer, right? Look at Iraq. Three years on, and we're still making amazing, remarkable progress every single day. Bush and Cheney keep saying so, so you know it must be true. And what's all this crazy "exit strategy" nonsense you hippies keep babbling on about? What part of "mission accomplished" don't you understand?
The current WH spin is that they'd maybe kinda prefer a diplomatic solution. Which, again, is exactly what they said about Iraq. And yes, there were diplomatic efforts. They just weren't good faith diplomatic efforts. They were designed to fail, so that war would appear to be the only remaining option. Some people might argue that threating people with nuclear annihilation is just a really shrewd negotiating tactic. Maybe it is, and maybe it isn't. There's a fine line between taking a hard line to push negotiations along, and taking a hard line to poison any chance of a deal. You see the latter a lot in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with each side pairing a negotiating track with a parallel track of sucide bombings or forcible land confiscations. And we all know how well that's worked out over the years. I'm convinced Bush & Cheney won't settle for anything other than a war. We'll be told that the Iranian leadership is untrustworthy (the complete opposite of our own leaders), fanatical (again, totally unlike Bush & Cheney), and an imminent threat to world peace (once again... you get the idea).
Hersh quotes sources as saying Bush now sees Iran as his presidential legacy. Which again is what was being said about Iraq a few years ago. That one didn't turn out so well, so we're going to try to change the subject and not talk about it anymore, or think about it, or learn anything from any mistakes that may have been made. Instead we're just going to pick a new country, place another high-stakes bet, and roll the dice again. Double or nothing.
Updated: Read this great rant titled Is Your Entire Country on Crack?.
Labels:
politics
Venus: Final Approach
ESA's Venus Express spacecraft is on final approach to the planet right now. Here are a few pictures of the planet, which will soon cease to be state-of-the-art if all goes well.
More images of the planet. I've deliberately omitted any Magellan images, just for the sake of variety.
Updated 11:51pm PDT: Inexplicably, there's no mission status page up over at SpaceflightNow. The closest you can get to live updates, as far as I can tell, is a webcam at ESA mission control, which updates every 30 seconds or so. You can see what's happening, more or less, although there's nothing to explain what's happening.
Many of the latest batch of stories showing up on Google News mention that the probe will research the planet's runaway greenhouse effect. Which is a big reason you won't see a US probe to the planet any time soon. Certain interested parties don't really care to learn any more about the warming effects of CO2. GWB & Co. would never fund a mission to Venus, and if a successor did so post-2008, it wouldn't make it out of the appropriations committee in Congress. The media would compliantly label the whole idea "too controversial", a "hot potato", and it'd be dead for another decade or two. And any insights that come from Venus Express will be automatically dismissed or ignored, just because they come from foreigners, from whom we can learn nothing.
And that's assuming that ESA's lackluster PR outfit gets the news out in the first place, which is far from certain.
On the bright side, we do get another NASA impactor mission in 2008. The LCROSS probe will be a secondary payload riding along with the big Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. The plan is to crash the LRO/LCROSS launch vehicle's upper stage into the moon and study the debris looking for water. Well, that, and also because big explosions rock, and grow hair on your chest. Gotta teach those hippie moon-huggers a lesson, or something. Maybe we'll even do it on the 4th of July again, or maybe even right before the election. Well, actually I don't know how that would play with the flat earth crowd, so we'll probably have to run some polls and consult with Karl first. I mean, the planet is apparently mentioned in the Bible, so we can be sure it really does exist and isn't just a liberal conspiracy or something -- although the brief reference seems to indicate the ancient Hebrews followed contemporary Greek practice and identified the morning and evening "stars" as separate entities. So assuming the Bible is inerrant, there's got to be two Venuslike planets out there, not just the one. Oh, except that they're actually stars that move, not planets.
Here are some additional goofy ideas about the planet:
- Velikovsky was a prominent astronomical crackpot back in the 50's. In his theories, Venus wandered the solar system at random, wreaking havoc everywhere it went, explaining all sorts of historical phenomena.
- A site suggesting that the planet's "Biblical orbit" was off by 5% from what's currently observed, and this has all sorts of obscure numerological implication.
- An article about Astrology in the Bible. Two great tastes that taste great together!
- Another religious article, Venus and Last Days Deceptions. Naturally, the gray aliens are involved somehow.
- Also, there's a conspiracy going on. But you probably knew that already.
Updated again: Venus Express is now in orbit. Or at least that's what "they" want you to think. :)
Updated yet again (4/12): The Planetary Society reports that the first Venus Express images will be released at 7am PST, 4/13. The current orbit is fairly distant and elongated, so it's supposed to be just an inkling of what we'll be seeing when VEX gets down to business. Of course, if ESA's image release policy is the same as what they've been doing with Mars Express and SMART-1, the public will get to see maybe one new image a month, tops, no matter how many they actually take. But that's just their way, I guess. Nature has an article titled "Venus ahoy!" that's also worth reading.
Labels:
space
Friday, April 07, 2006
On the road again...
Gentle Reader(s), I'll be out of town for a few days, and I'm nowhere near cool enough, or lame enough, to bring a laptop along and blog over WiFi from Starbucks. And I'm far too behind the times to even consider posting photos directly from a camera phone, which I understand you can do these days.
So basically what I'm saying is that it would be surprising if you see any posts from me before at least Sunday, and if you see any, suspect an impostor.
I was going to post some pics or give some advice or something on what to do until I get back, but we're all adults here, probably, and if you still haven't figured out how to amuse yourself for a couple of days, there's very little I can do to help. Sorry, but that's just how it is.
On that cheery note, see ya!
So basically what I'm saying is that it would be surprising if you see any posts from me before at least Sunday, and if you see any, suspect an impostor.
I was going to post some pics or give some advice or something on what to do until I get back, but we're all adults here, probably, and if you still haven't figured out how to amuse yourself for a couple of days, there's very little I can do to help. Sorry, but that's just how it is.
On that cheery note, see ya!
Labels:
metablog
Thursday, April 06, 2006
Gorge
So I drove out to the Columbia River Gorge yesterday, hiked around a little, took pictures, and had a pizza at the Pietro's in Hood River.
If I may digress for a moment, the Pietro's excursion was worth the trip just by itself. Classic pizza parlors have gotten quite scarce over the years, and when you find one, it's to be treasured. It takes you right back to 1983, after soccer practice. It does for me, anyway. There was a time when every pizza place was basically the same: The same fairly short list of toppings, the same bank of classic 80's videogames, the big gas fireplace, the salad bar, everything. If you wanted pizza, that's where you went, rich or poor or anything in between. I don't know what killed off so many of these places. Maybe it was delivery, I'm not sure. My personal theory is that it has to do with the eroding middle class. If you look around the Portland area, you'll see plenty of gourmet pizza places selling fantastic pizza with prices to match (Pizzicato, Hot Lips), and you'll see even more places (nearly all of them big national chains) offering truly disgusting pizza for a heavily advertised low, low price. And next to nothing in between. It's sort of like what's happening in the retail world, where you'll do fine if you're a discount store -- Wal-Mart, Target, Costco, etc., or a high-end ultra-deluxe retailer like Nordstrom, but there's not a lot of money to be made anymore in between the two extremes.
But I digress. The picture deserves a bit of explanation, I guess. I took lots of pictures of the usual suspects: Multnomah Falls, the Vista House, Horsetail Falls, and so forth, but I thought they were generally sort of unremarkable. You can find far better examples just by googling, But I thought this white sturgeon picture was fairly compelling. I coudn't quite capture the whole face; sturgeon have some droopy catfish-like barbels under their chins, and I missed those. Hey, the fish was moving at the time, I'm just happy it turned out as well as it did. This was taken at the new-ish white sturgeon display at the Bonneville Fish Hatchery. Sturgeon have armored plates instead of scales, resulting in the extraordinary texture it shows in the photo. To me it looks like someone's attempt to carve a fish out of bubbly black basalt. And let's not forget that weird, glassy eye. Freakin' sea monster, that's what it is.
At least it's an edible sea monster. Here's a recipe that purports to be similar to how Lewis and Clark might have prepared sturgeon. And if you have sturgeon left over, which you will because they're so huge it's not even funny, your favorite search engine will happily give you page after page of sturgeon recipes. I mention this partly because of the whole double meaning thing with the title "Gorge". It's like I'm being sophisiticated and artistic, or something.
So anyway, that's what I did yesterday. Today I went to the art museum and wandered around the new wing. But I'll save that for that other art-related post I promised a couple of days ago.
tags: oregon sturgeon columbia river gorge multnomah falls pizza
Labels:
columbia gorge
,
photos
Tuesday, April 04, 2006
Mmmm.... Lemon Bars...
It's sunny outside and I have the day off, so I think I'll go up to the Gorge and hike around a bit. If I take any good pictures, I may post them here. Or not. We'll see.
In the meantime, I haven't had breakfast yet, so I thought I'd do a brief post about lemon bars, my favorite (perhaps my only favorite) classic 50's American pastry. Ok, I don't know whether they were invented in the 50's or not, but when you think bar-shaped pastries, you think 50's. It's right up there with vaccuuming in pearls.
The difference is that lemon bars are actually good. At least the ones made today are good. I didn't experience the 50's firsthand. The originals were probably made with artificial lemon flavor, yellow food coloring, saccharin, and lard. But today you're allowed to use actual lemons, and that can be quite tasty. It's not the world's most complex taste, but hey, it's dessert, it's breakfast, it goes with coffee, what more do you want?
Seeing lemon bar recipes in old cookbooks is all the more amazing when you look at the recipes surrounding them. On either side, you'll find endless soul-crushing jello molds packed with pineapple, shrimp, and beets; horrific casseroles of ground mystery meat, lima beans, ketchup, and lots of extra salt; a catalog of unnatural acts done with hard-boiled eggs; bland, greyish roasts covered in deep layers of quivering fat...
Wait, I'm wandering off topic here. And it's getting kind of gross, too. So back to the lemon bars, already.
Some lemon bar recipes, from Cooking for Engineers, about.com's Southern food, and the above image, which takes you to a lemon bar recipe in Japanese, believe it or not.
Still don't think they're a sophisticated, modern delicacy? Here are two recipes in French. Convinced now?
Key Lime bars are nice also, btw.
Saturday, April 01, 2006
Warhol Goes To Mars
Here's the latest set of images of the Martian atmosphere, from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. It's a cliche anymore to compare things to Andy Warhol's Pop Art, but I do wonder whether it was at least semi-deliberate in this case. If not deliberately Warholian, I suspect whoever put this image together had some sense about the formal, abstract properties of the thing, completely apart from what it's a picture of. Scientists tend to have a much broader education than people realize, and they generally don't have a horror of the arts in the way that many artists have -- and pride themselves on having -- a deep horror of the sciences.
At the risk of sounding like your tedious aunt the librarian, let me recommend another book: Darwin's Audubon: Science and the Liberal Imagination, collected essays by Gerald Weissmann. The Powell's page describes the book thusly:
In this retrospective of Gerald Weissmann's best-known essays, the reader is treated to his unique perspective on what C. P. Snow once dubbed "the Two Cultures" — art and science. In Darwin's Audubon, Weissmann examines the powerful influence that the two exert over one another and how they have helped each other evolve. From listening to the scientists who gather ever year to sing at the Woods Hole Cantata Consort to looking at the influence of Audubon's watercolors on Darwin's On the Origin of Species; from comparing William Carlos Williams's poetry to his unedited case books to watching Oliver Wendell Holmes grow as doctor and as poet, Weissmann weaves a rich tapestry that will delight fans and newcomers alike.
If you like Godel, Escher, Bach, or anything by Stephen Jay Gould, you'll probably enjoy this book as well.
When I was gathering bits and pieces for this post, I ended up with a lot of links and notes about modern art and modernism, intending to take some ideas from a couple of essays in Darwin's Audubon and run with them a bit. But I looked over my draft of this post, and this portion doesn't flow into the other part very well (and the other part's not really done anyway), so I'll punt the rest off to a subsequent post. That'll give you time to go find the book and read it, so you'll have a better idea of what I'm mumbling on about. If you choose to ever come back here, anyway. Either way, go ahead: Good writing is good for you.
Labels:
space
Friday, March 31, 2006
Did you mean: "Cyclotron"?
If you go to Google and search for the word "Cyclotram", the very first hit is this page you're looking at right now. At least for the moment, anyway. And this is nice and everything, but above the link to me is a "helpful" bit asking users if they wouldn't really rather be searching for stuff about cyclotrons. I realize they're just trying to be helpful. I realize it's even possible that more people go to Google searching for cyclotron info than they do looking for this blog. Again, strictly for the time being, anyway.
However, I can't help thinking about all those potential visitors who instead get lured away by the sweet siren song of high-energy physics, never to be seen again. It makes me sad, kinda. All's not lost, though; if the physicists are going to come play in my pool, I can go play in theirs. I'll just do a post all about cyclotrons, so I'll show up in that search too, and maybe lure a few of those wayward surfers back to the path of, uh, righteousness, or whatever. Why I'd even care about that remains an open question; it's not like I'm selling banner ads or anything. Trying to game the system for its own sake, maybe? But regardless, it's what I've decided to do. So there. On that deeply cynical note, here's the list:
tags: cyclotron physics neutrino tevatron fermilab antarctica qnx google
However, I can't help thinking about all those potential visitors who instead get lured away by the sweet siren song of high-energy physics, never to be seen again. It makes me sad, kinda. All's not lost, though; if the physicists are going to come play in my pool, I can go play in theirs. I'll just do a post all about cyclotrons, so I'll show up in that search too, and maybe lure a few of those wayward surfers back to the path of, uh, righteousness, or whatever. Why I'd even care about that remains an open question; it's not like I'm selling banner ads or anything. Trying to game the system for its own sake, maybe? But regardless, it's what I've decided to do. So there. On that deeply cynical note, here's the list:
- First off, here's the Wikipedia article, if you want to brush up on what a cyclotron is.
- Lawrence Berkeley National Lab has a history page about the very first cyclotron, created by, you guessed it, Ernest O. Lawrence.
- A Java applet demonstrating particle paths inside a cyclotron. Not the flashiest graphics in the world, but it gets the point across.
- Want your own cyclotron? Build one! This guy did. Granted, he was a physics Ph.D. candidate at the time the article came out (Nov. '04), but still, he built one in his parents' garage. So how hard could it be, really?
- Don't want to build one? Too lazy? Scared? Then just buy one, or have it donated, and install it in your home. Here are two stories about a guy in Alaska who's trying to do exactly that. His neighbors aren't so happy, though, some going so far as to call it a potential Three Mile Island. Which is silly. Actually everyone involved in this whole saga is silly, which is what's so fun about it. Alaska...
- A fairly cool blog titled Cyclotron. Is not about cyclotrons so far as I can tell.
- The local angle, such as it is: There aren't any cyclotrons or similar fancy gadgets in Oregon, probably because they cost money to build and operate. But the U of O's high energy physics group does collaborate on out-of-state projects.
- As an aside, let me take a moment to lament the demise of Greco-Latinate neologisms (cyclotron, television, etc.) in favor of TLA's (Three-Letter Acronyms -- VCR, DVD, etc.). At some point society decided that acronyms were more modern and scientific, or something. This seems to have happened roughly in the late 60's and early 70's, around the time U.S. Steel renamed itself "USX". The reason for this trend remains unknown to me. If the cyclotron was invented today, you can bet it wouldn't be named that. And I'm fairly certain that the makers of Unknown World intended the term "cyclotram" to evoke "cyclotron", so that term wouldn't have been coined either, and thus this blog would be nameless, which would be a real shame.
- Physicists iterated the "-tron" naming scheme for quite a while after the practice had lost currency in the larger culture: After the cyclotron came they synchrotron, the Bevatron, the Tevatron... The Tevatron is the current pride and joy of Fermilab, although perhaps for not much longer. It seems that the shiny new LHC (=TLA) accelerator near Geneva, Switzerland will render the Tevatron and others like it obsolete. The editors of Scientific American are having a cow about this. In an editorial titled The Collider Calamity, they express deep alarm that the US soon won't have any state of the art particle physics facilities. I can see how this could be alarming from a pure national pride standpoint, but their economic competitiveness argument strikes me as a bit strained. If physicists really want to get funded in this country, they of all people ought to know that it's important to spin their proposal as an exciting new way to kill lots of people, because that's the only thing the Power$ That Be care about anymore. And they ought to take note that discussing the origins of the universe without relying on the literal account given in Genesis is career suicide in so long as there's a Republican in the White House.
- An important recent Tevatron result comes from the MINOS experiment, confirming that neutrinos do have mass. Not a lot of mass, certainly, but a nonzero amount, and given the estimated number of neutrinos in the universe, it really adds up.
- The existence of massive neutrinos, we're told, implies the existence of at least one more as-yet-undetected neutrino, a so-called "sterile" neutrino that can only interact with normal matter via gravity. It's recently been proposed that sterile neutrinos may be a good candidate to solve the dark matter / dark energy problem. Here are two stories about this idea.
- While we're on the subject of neutrinos, a couple of stories about neutrino detectors. First, the current travails at the venerable Homestake detector, located deep in a defunct gold mine near Lead, SD.
- And a construction update on the next-generation IceCube detector, located deep in the polar icecap in Antarctica. Gee, South Dakota or Antarctica. Whereas if you're an astronomer working in visible or IR light, you get to go work in Hawaii instead. Hmm.
- You don't see neutrinos used as technobabble very often, but here's one example: An article about the QNX Neutrino real-time operating system. I gather the term "neutrino" conveys feelings of speed, lightness, and in-crowd geekiness. I've played with QNX before and I was rather impressed. Unlike most RTOSes it provides a familiar Unix-like api, so that you can port existing software to it without rewriting everything. I have to wonder what the future holds for the OS in an increasingly open-source world, though. I'm a firm believer in having a diverse OS ecosystem, and it'd be a real shame if it went away.
- And at this point I've wandered completely off topic. So I think I'll stop here.
tags: cyclotron physics neutrino tevatron fermilab antarctica qnx google
Labels:
metablog
Wednesday, March 29, 2006
Vaguely Related Items
I collected these and really thought I could develop a common theme between them, but it didn't happen in time, and I'm anxious to get these off my plate so I can start on the next post. It was always going to be a semi-stream-of-consciousness post, so it's not really a big step to just throw in the towel and say it's just pure stream-of-consciousness. I guess. Anyway, here's what I've got for you today:
- SpaceflightNow now has the mini-moonlet story. As usual, their account is better than most.
- It can't model anything so complex as rings full of countless particles of all sizes, but JPL has a neato 3d orbit simulator applet. It's fun for the whole family, if they're all space geeks.
- If you're already worried about asteroids or comets hitting the Earth, don't go here.
- OTOH, if the orbit applet just whetted your appetite, you might enjoy NASA's Journal of Space Mission Architecture. All the gory details you could ever want, and more.
- Here's an article about the software of space exploration, with many, many links.
- If you mistype "asteroid", you might get "astroid", a reasonably nice mathematical curve. Coincidentally, back in 7th grade I used to doodle in class a lot, especially math class, and I seem to recall I had an alien spaceship that looked a lot like an astroid curve.
- Yes, believe it or not, I hated math at one time, and I didn't change my mind until a couple of years into college. Except for geometry. I always really liked geometry. So maybe you can imagine how much I liked this interactive version of Euclid's Elements. This Java applet's been around forever (in Internet terms), like the JPL orbit simulator I mentioned earlier, and I just don't tire of them. They're classics.
- Another classic from the really early days of the net is the Find-the-Spam page. And by "early", I mean really early, maybe 1994 or so. I remember visiting it with Netscape 1.x. Ahh, the memories. I remember accidentally breaking Find-the-Spam shortly after Netscape 2.0 came out. Netscape 2 featured exciting new things like HTML tables, background colors other than white, Java (rudimentary), Javascript, the center and blink tags, and much, much more. In those naive, carefree days of yore, Find-the-Spam would let you submit any old text you wanted, and any HTML tags just became part of the page. Any HTML tags. Including the script tag, it turns out. So I thought I'd have a little fun, and I wrote a tiny bit of Javascript that cycled the background color: red, green, blue, red, green, blue, etc., a few times, which would've been kind of cute except that I'd mangled the termination condition, so that the browser would get wedged in an infinite loop inside its Javascript parser. Win3.1 clients had it especially bad; the loop wedged Netscape so hard that even Ctrl-Alt-Del didn't help, and your only option was to just turn the box off manually. Yow. But I always like to look on the bright side, and even though I think of this as the worst bug I ever wrote, it's great that I haven't managed to top it after all these years. And anyway, anybody who used Win3.1 at all would've been used to rebooting all the time anyway, right?
- A couple more vaguely-related geometry items. First, I'd like to recommend Underwood Dudley's hilarious book The Trisectors.
- If you like that book, you'll love another of his books, titled Mathematical Cranks.
- While I'm recommending books, I'd also like to recommend one of my most favorite natural history / biology books, A Desert Calling: Life in a Forbidding Landscape, by Michael A. Mares.
- And another great book you ought to read, William Broad's The Universe Below : Discovering the Secrets of the Deep Sea
- Just one more book for your reading list: Venus Revealed, by David Grinspoon.
- Another math item, this time about the famous Four Color Theorem, as it applies to the wondrous world of marketing. Well, ok, it's just a metaphor. But how many marketing people have ever heard of the thing, much less use Wikipedia to explain it? Should I be happy that people have heard of the four color problem? Should I be annoyed that the solution's being misapplied? I honestly have no idea.
- I was originally going to title this post "A Garden of Forking Paths", after the Borges story. I decided that was a bit too, well, twee, but by that time I'd already gathered a couple fo interesting links, so I figured I may as well include them.
- Therefore, here are two sites that I guess you could describe as "inspired by" the story.
- Another Borges story, titled The Aleph.
- And the WIkipedia article for the word "aleph", a word with quite a few meanings. One relates to transfinite cardinals, while another is the name of an obscure programming language, which was once intended to be to the Plan9 OS what C is to Unix.
- This item isn't even vaguely related to the others, but here it is anyway. You don't have to be a fan of bad movies to enjoy extremely funny reviews slamming bad movies. Today's choice example is Roger Ebert's review of the new movie Basic Instinct 2. Enjoy!
- Today's tidbit to make the fundies livid: Those commie liberal scientists have done another of their "scientific studies", and concluded that praying for sick people doesn't help at all. Golly. Big surprise there.
Thrilling News from Space
- The first pic is from today's solar eclipse, but with a twist: It was taken from the International Space Station, looking down at the moon's shadow on the Earth's surface.
- The second pic is another Cassini image, this time of the moon Rhea in front of the rings. The rings are overexposed, to bring out some details of the moon's shadowed surface.
- In other Cassini news, researchers have found a handful of 100-meter-scale moonlets embedded in Saturn's A ring. Their paper's in the current issue of Nature, so if you (unlike me) are a subscriber, you can find the paper here. This raises the question of how small can something be and still deserve to be called a moon and given its own unique name. The researchers suggest there might be millions of objects this size lurking in the rings, and giving each one a name would obviously be impractical. Anybody who's enjoyed watching the argument about whether Pluto and 2003 UB313 are planets or not is going to really enjoy this one. There's nothing scientists love better than arguing over nomenclature. Or at least it seems that way sometimes.
- The great Polish SF author Stanislaw Lem has passed away at age 84. He was best known for his novel Solaris, but I've always preferred his robot stories collected in The Cyberiad, and his Ijon Tichy books. Rest in peace.
- The once-cancelled Dawn mission is back in business. Yay!
- You may have seen the first images from the shiny new Mars Reconaissance Orbiter that were released a few days ago. The HiRISE camera team's promising a new batch of pics next Thursday, April 6th.
- Also coming up in April, the ESA's Venus Express probe should arrive in orbit around Venus on April 11.
- Meanwhile, the MESSENGER probe will fly by the planet on October 24th, on its long road to Mercury.
- And if you can't wait for Venus images, today's your lucky day. These sites offer archives of old Soviet Venera images from the surface of the planet, enhanced and cleaned up using modern image processing techniques. Very cool! Although I still don't really want to visit the place in person.
- It turns out that 1991 VG, the #1 easiest asteroid for a probe to rendezvous with is actually an alien probe. Wow. Who knew? And what kind of third-rate aliens are they, that they could come all this far and that's the closest they can get to actually landing, or even going into Earth orbit? Lamers. Here's what the object's discoverer had to say about it. But then again, he's posting from a .gov domain, so there's just gotta be some kind of evil conspiracy or coverup going on, right?
- Further afield, you might enjoy the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopedia, which tries to keep track of all planets discovered outside our solar system. Two more gas giants were announced right after March 14th's big "ice giant" announcement. For the latest two, there wasn't even a press release. My, how jaded we've gotten.
- Here's at least one fundie who argues today's solar eclipse is a sign people need to repent. I'm sure I could find others, but he does a bit of numerology to link eclipses with the number 666 and the coming Apocalypse on (you guessed it) June 6th, 2006, so I'm hereby declaring him "TEH WINNAR".
- In contrast, BrokebackBlokes notes that "many of the countries that could view the total eclipse today have a poor or abysmal relationship with their homosexual community." Although you could probably say the same thing of any eclipse, or anything else that encompasses large swaths of the Earth's surface.
tags: eclipse cassini saturn moonlet venus mars dawn Stanislaw Lem apocalypse
Labels:
space
Tuesday, March 28, 2006
Fishy
I've been curious about what sort of fish species live in the Willamette and Columbia, so I did some googling, and it's surprising how little info there is out there on the net. Most examples focus exclusively on fish of interest to recreational anglers, like this page from the US Forest Service. You'll also come across a few sites that get all new-agey about salmon, just to spice things up a bit. I'm not going to do any salmon links, because they get plenty of attention already, and any decent search engine will find you everything you ever wanted to know, and more.
Oh, all right, here's one for ya: the site for the Save Our Wild Salmon campaign. Just remember that they're not the only fish in the sea, ok?
I did finally come across a doc with what's currently thought to be a comprehensive list [PDF], giving over thirty species (both native and introduced) known to live in the Willamette and its tributaries. You'd think there'd be more of a fuss about all those nonnative species in the river, but many of them are considered good fishin' and good eatin', so I guess that makes it all ok, or something. Meanwhile, we have a government-sponsored bounty program where people are paid to catch as many Northern Pikeminnows as they can, because they prey on young salmon. They're a native fish, and they've been doing this since time immemorial, but we've decided that salmon populations can't withstand all the environmental damage we've done and their natural predators, so obviously the predators have to go. It's only logical, right? Oh, but don't eat that pikeminnow. They're loaded with PCBs.
More info about several of the species listed can be found on a page from the Royal BC Museum, listing freshwater fishes of the Columbia River basin.
Here's a longer bit about smelt, which the list calls "eulachon". Apparently that's another "common" name for the fish, although I've never heard anyone use it. When I was little, we'd sometimes go smelt dipping out on the Sandy River. I remember the river being thick with fish, and you'd just scoop your smelt net through the water, pull up a net so full you could hardly lift it, dump the contents in your bucket, and repeat until you had all you wanted. No fee, no permit, no limit, no nothin', if I recall correctly. It hardly seems sporting, which is because it's exactly the same method the Indians used to use, and they were doing it for subsistence, not for sport. And it hardly seems sustainable either. At the time (in the supposedly environmentally enlightened 1980s, no less), everyone figured it was OK to keep doing it that way, because people assumed smelt were an inexhaustable resource. And then the population crashed in the 90's, and hasn't recovered. Gee, I wonder why?
Once you'd gotten your buckets of smelt home, it was time to clean all those oily little fish. Wherever you decided to clean 'em, the place would look and smell like a cannery in no time. And it seemed to take forever. And the really sad part is that I didn't actually like smelt very much. They taste a lot like sardines, really fishy and oily, which is usually not a hit with the kiddies. A good portion of the catch ultimately went to waste. So I've probably earned at least some miniscule part of the blame for the fish's decline, I imagine.
The first image above is a school of smelt off the coast of California. I'm not entirely sure it's the same species that we've got here, but it's a nice picture, regardless. The second image is a chiselmouth, one of the area's many small minnow-type fish. Mostly I liked the name. It'd be a great name for a band.
And I should at least mention sturgeon somewhere in here. They're not exactly unknown, of course. That would be impossible. They're freakin' prehistoric sea monsters. It turns out that we've actually got two sturgeon species here, and people are getting concerned about the green sturgeon, because everybody's been ignoring it up to now, I guess because it's (relatively) smaller, and not commercially harvested. The state just tweaked its regulations back in December, so now you aren't allowed to keep green sturgeon more than 5 feet long, down from the old limit of 5' 6". And here's a pic of Herman II the Sturgeon, a white sturgeon and the state fish & wildlife department's mascot. Herman I used to go on road trips to the Oregon State Fair every summer, until his mysterious disappearance at the ripe age of 75 or so. People later realized that this roadtrip thing wasn't actually very good for the fish, so the fairgrounds now boast a sculpture instead. But that's just not going to impress the kids in quite the same way, is it?
Another rather, uh, memorable aquatic creature around these parts is the lamprey, of which our region can boast several closely related species. (In fact, they've been known to live in small streams right here in the Portland area) Lamprey stocks are in decline too. Here's a PDF about Pacific Lamprey conservation. Here's another, lamprey-related conference proceedings from 2004. In general they're rather unsympathetic creatures with little to recommend them, but they're native, and they belong here. Local tribes thought, and still think, they're delicious. And hey, I'll try almost anything once, especially if it involves stepping outside cultural biases. I've only seen lampreys in person on the occasional trip up to the fish ladder at Bonneville Dam. There's a viewing area there where you can sit and watch the fish trying to go upriver, and if you're lucky (or unlucky) enough to get there when the lampreys are migrating. They often attach themselves to the viewing window by their mouths, their bodies writhing in the current. Well, it's not something you see every day, certainly.
In the Great Lakes, there's an ongoing invasion of nonnative sea lampreys, which are considered quite a scourge on the local lake trout. Here the situation's reversed: Lampreys are native, and lake trout are an introduced species.
Seems that PBS's Nova did a show a while back about ancient creatures of the deep, and the accompanying website lists both lampreys and sturgeon as living fossils. We seem to have a lot of "obsolete" organisms in this part of the world. We've mostly got conifer and fern forests instead of deciduous trees and flowers, and there's always the pronghorn, which is not an antelope. I don't know what it is. Things just don't evolve as quickly here, I guess. And don't get me started about bigfoot.
And in the "WTF" department, I ran across the website for an outfit calling itself Lamprey Systems. I don't know quite what to make of the site, and I don't think I'm anywhere near cool enough to visit it, but I love their logo, FWIW.
tags: oregon columbia willamette fish smelt lamprey sturgeon chiselmouth
Labels:
animals
Monday, March 27, 2006
Buyer's Remorse
It turns out that a lot of the people responsible for GWB's latest drop in the polls are not commie pinko liberals, or even wishy-washy moderates or independents. No, he's actually starting to alienate a few conservatives now. Not a majority, by any means -- for the most part they still march in formation, singing the praises of the Glorious Leader. But it's no longer unanimous, which is something. And even the holdouts, I think, are worshiping the manly-man leader they wish Bush was, and trying hard to ignore the underwhelming portrait that emerges from the, y'know, overwheming evidence and all. Why couldn't people have wised up before the last election, instead of getting a bad case of buyer's remorse a few months later? Now we're stuck with three more long, soul-crushing years of ol' whatsisname, which will turn out exactly the same as the last five. It's not like he's suddenly getting any more competent or less arrogant as time goes by. At least being a lame duck sort of limits the damage he can do in the time remaining, I guess.
A few recent examples of former core Bush supporters now having second thoughts:
Some years ago, it was proposed that we go to a system where presidents are elected for a single six-year term. I'm starting to think this is an excellent notion. Looking at our past few two-term presidents, six years is roughly when the public gets sick of 'em, and it's about when they run out of ideas, political capital, and motivated staff who can get the job done. Of course, the absolutely logical and well-reasoned and not at all emotional response at the time was to point out that this is what Mexico already does. Which I think probably killed the idea right then and there.
Other thrilling political news and views:
A few recent examples of former core Bush supporters now having second thoughts:
- Conservatives in California
- Ohio Republicans
- Voters in Indiana
- Even some residents of 5 Southern states.
Some years ago, it was proposed that we go to a system where presidents are elected for a single six-year term. I'm starting to think this is an excellent notion. Looking at our past few two-term presidents, six years is roughly when the public gets sick of 'em, and it's about when they run out of ideas, political capital, and motivated staff who can get the job done. Of course, the absolutely logical and well-reasoned and not at all emotional response at the time was to point out that this is what Mexico already does. Which I think probably killed the idea right then and there.
Other thrilling political news and views:
- From an opinion piece titled Bush: The Procrastinator-in-Chief:
First, the president admitted that he got us into a war that he was not going to get us out of. He acknowledged that when he is back in Crawford enjoying his retirement, clearing brush and shooting quail, American troops will still be in Iraq, fighting and dying for reasons that the majority of Americans have yet to understand, though the president keeps explaining and re-explaining them. - If you talk to your lawyer on the phone, the NSA may be listening. None of that fancy-schmancy attorney-client privilege for us anymore, no sirree. Abolished by executive order, just like everything else.
- And don't expect any help from the Supreme Court, either. If you're an "evildoer", you have no Constitutional rights whatsoever. Scalia said so himself. It's not that I have any affection or sympathy for the evildoers, of course. By which I mean the actual evildoers. What alarms me is that the Bushies are trying to establish a precedent, so they can later apply the same methods and reasoning to people who have nothing to do with terrorism. A few years down the road, perhaps we'll be torturing confessions out of shoplifters, and hauling anti-Bush protesters off to Guantanamo, once the public's gotten used to the idea.
- The San Francisco Chronicle has an excellent series titled "War Without End", about the struggles of soldiers who've been seriously injured in Iraq.
- It's reported that Karl Rove himself is the source for those once-deleted, now recovered emails in the Plame case. Presumably they implicate someone other than Rove. A lot of people seem to think they might implicate Cheney, as Cheney and Rove have fallen out over the years. Grab some popcorn and pop open a cold one. This oughtta be good.
- Remember when GWB was first elected, and he said Latin America was his top foreign policy focus? That didn't turn out to be the case, for obvious reasons. I remember when he made that pledge, and I have to say I thought it was insincere from the get-go. Be that as it may, while George was busy obsessing about the Mideast, oil, Armageddon, and so forth, much of Latin America has decided they'd rather not be under our thumb, thank you very much. The Monroe Doctrine is dead, film at 11. Since the powers that be in the Beltway still can't imagine relating to anyone south of Brownsville, TX on a remotely equal basis, they're unable to come up with any effective policies at all. When condescending lectures don't work, they try a bit of ineffective saber-rattling, and when that doesn't work either, they lapse into sullen silence, like Latin America will come crawling back to us if we just ignore them long enough, or something.
- A fun opinion piece about Katherine Harris's run for a senate seat in Florida, titled "Cosmic justice for plutocrat?"
- The Georgia legislature's considering a bill that would adopt the Bible as an official school textbook. Not all fundies are thrilled about this, it turns out. Some of them feel that teaching about it without insisting on a single, literal interpretation would be worse than not teaching it at all.
- A good article dissecting the so-called "War on Christians" the fundies have dreamed up.
- In a similar vein, an article about a professor who proposes that human religious impulses can be studied scientifically. A lot of religious people don't seem to care much for the idea. Amazon carries his recent book on the subject.
- And here's a longish NPR piece about Kevin Phillips' new book American Theocracy, including a chapter from the book.
- On a somewhat lighter note, the local newspaper down in Melbourne, Australia is wringing its hands about the sad state of American cheerleading. Seriously.
Labels:
politics
Sunday, March 26, 2006
Zubr/Wisent
In the media coverage of the ongoing turmoil in Belarus, you might have seen a mention of a student organization known as "Zubr", which is always helpfully translated as "Bison". Media accounts never explain why something in Belarus would be named after an animal we in the US always associate with the Great Plains and points west. This is probably because media people themselves have no idea. But the topic combines two of my favorite things to blabber on about here: politics, and animals. Whether they're "cute" is debatable, of course, but at least they're interesting.
It turns out that there's a European bison as well (a.k.a. zubr, or wisent). Seriously. It's critically endangered, with small remnant populations scattered around Eastern Europe, primarily in Poland and Belarus. The gene pool is so small that it's unclear whether they'll survive in the long term or not. But for now, at least, they've managed to hang on. They can be crossbred with American bison, but that's strongly frowned upon.
Closer to home, it seems there once was a local subspecies of American bison here in Oregon, Bos bison oregonus, but they were wiped out way back in 1840, before the Oregon Trail even got going in earnest. The bison that are raised here now, in a semi-domesticated way, are descended from Midwestern populations that survived the big bison kill-off in the 19th century. It doesn't surprise me that the government tried to wipe out bison in order to destroy Indian cultures. It does surprise me that they just sent people out to shoot them and leave them for the vultures, instead of finding a way to make money off of it. Just goes to show how "primitive" people were in the 1880's, I suppose. I guess it was one of those taboos people use to reinforce their tribal "old us vs. them" distinctions. Euro-Americans generally wouldn't eat bison, all because it was "Indian food". Which was completely their loss. Bison is what you wish beef was. It's delicious. Here's a recipe for a sort of boeuf borguinon, except made with bison instead of beef. I haven't tried it yet, but it sounds great.
Getting back to the tribal identity thing, I think the idea behind the name "Zubr" was to claim something that's (semi-)unique to Belarus, something that Russia doesn't have, plus a nice pro-environment twist. If you're going to pick a nationalist symbol, you could do a lot worse. Even if the average citizen won't ever see one in person. At least the'll look good on your money, if nothing else.
The most, uh, picturesque bison experience I've ever had was in Yellowstone National Park a number of years ago. We were driving from Oregon to South Carolina in a tiny little MG, and the scenic route led us through Yellowstone. The first snowfall of the season had occurred up in the mountains, driving a lot of the wildlife down into heavily-touristed areas. We were driving along the park's loop road, checking out the scenery, when we came around a corner and there we were, right in the middle of a big herd of wild bison. In a car that probably weighed less than many of the animals. And we were looking up at them. So we sat there, and sat there, until they moved off the road, making no sudden moves or loud noises. We don't even have any pictures of the bison, because the camera wanted to use its flash, and that didn't seem like a very wise idea to us. I do remember it quite vividly, though.
tags: bison belarus zubr oregon yellowstone mg
Labels:
animals
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)