Friday, December 04, 2020

Dutchman Falls

Ok, so in our next installment in Things Upstream from Multnomah Falls, we're back on the Larch Mountain Trail after our sidetrip to Little Multnomah Falls (and the top of Multnomah Falls), and we've crossed the second footbridge on the creek, which quickly brings us to Dutchman Falls, a trio (or so) of small drops that add up to around 35' overall. It's not really the main event along this trail, but it has a name and pretty much everyone agrees it counts as a waterfall, so here we are.

The obvious hook for my usual search engine deep dive is the name. It's an odd name, and doesn't really fit with the other place names in the area. Where did the name come from, and why is it called that? It turns out the name is unofficial and surprisingly recent. This is odd because the falls are easily visible from the Larch Mountain Trail, and the trail's been there since around 1916. An August 28th 1921 Oregonian article about the still-new trail devoted most of a page to large vintage photos of Dutchman and Wiesendanger Falls, but without providing names for either of them. People of that era were mad for tacking wildly melodramatic names onto anything that would hold still long enough (for one example, some eroded rocks near Bridal Veil Falls somehow became the "Pillars of Hercules", which requires more imagination than even I can muster). But that just sort of didn't happen here, and I'm not sure why not.

Skipping forward all the way to 1983 1998, the author of Waterfalls of the Pacific Northwest (later The Waterfall Lover's Guide to the Pacific Northwest) aimed to be comprehensive & cover minor waterfalls like this as well as major ones. Referring to places as "the northernmost unnamed waterfall on Multnomah Creek" or "Unnamed Waterfall #27" is clunky and gets old quickly, so he ended up inventing names for a few places that didn't previously have them., like "Dutchman Falls" here, so named because it's just downstream from a place known as "Dutchman Tunnel", which we'll get to in a moment. There weren't any other alternate proposed names that I've seen, so I think the name's just sort of gained traction over time for lack of anything else to call it. That said, the Oregonian has still only used the name twice as of early December 2020: first in 2016 in an article on the Multnomah-Wahkeena loop, and again in 2019 in an article on trails that had reopened after the Eagle Creek Fire.

Regarding the tunnel I just mentioned, I'm sorry to report that it's not a real tunnel, or even a painted-on Wile E. Coyote tunnel, but a short stretch of trail where you walk beneath an overhanging basalt shelf and immediately next to the creek, so it kind of looks like half of a tunnel if you squint just right. Don't get me wrong, it's a famous, picturesque spot that regularly appears in calendars and coffee table books and so forth, usually as a frame for Wiesendanger Falls, the next falls further upstream from there. So overall I'd rather walk through this than try to negotiate an actual dark, damp tunnel; I'm just saying that if you travel the world looking for tunnels, to blog about or hide your pirate gold in or whatever, this spot is going to be a real disappointment.

None of this explains where the "Dutchman" part comes from. I don't have a definite answer here, but I have a couple of ideas. The interwebs don't have a lot of leads on this point; the Oregonian has never used the name "Dutchman Tunnel" (or "Dutchman's" for that matter), much less explained it; the closest result I found there -- to go off on a tangent for a moment -- was a March 1986 article profiling Dutch-born artist Arnold Zweerts, who'd been recruited to create a mosaic for the pedestrian tunnel under I-84 at Multnomah Falls. His proposal (as detailed in a longer article a month later) would have decorated the entire tunnel interior with Columbia Gorge nature themes, at a cost of around $500k in 1986 dollars. Which was a problem, as the Forest Service had precisely zero 1986 dollars to spend on the project, and that was a lot of money to raise here via private donations back then. Or now, really. Various influential nonprofits and experts chimed to oppose the idea, insisting that it would somehow compete with & maybe upstage the actual waterfall. I suspect they were more worried about it competing for scarce donations against their own worthy fundraising campaigns, things like restoring the lodge at the falls. In any case, the mosaic never came to pass, and if it had I think we all know what would've happened then: A few visitors would pay attention to it briefly on their way to the hot dog stand outside the lodge; there would be petty vandalism attempts now and then; and I would've done a long blog post about it years ago, explaining that it was almost certainly the most-seen and least-noticed art in the state, reeling off semi-fun facts about how it almost didn't happen.

So I'm fairly sure that's not where the name "Dutchman Tunnel" comes from (although that story does predate the earliest newspaper usage of the tunnel name I can find online, a 1993 Deseret News travel article about the Gorge). I also doubt it comes from the "Dutchman tunnel hull", a popular type of racing hydroplane boat from the late 1960s and early 1970s, which dominates the top search results for the term "dutchman tunnel". It seems the boat's Midwestern designer had a long Dutch name that American boat buyers couldn't (or couldn't be bothered to) pronounce or spell correctly, so "Dutchman" stuck instead. I suppose the same name trouble could've happened here too, and "Dutchman" refers to one specific Dutchman, but it's been long enough ago that nobody remembers who it's named for anymore. So that's hypothesis number one. It seems plausible at least, though I have precisely zero actual evidence to back it up.

Hypothesis two is the cringe-inducing one, which is that the name is playing off old ethnic stereotypes, along the lines of "Dutch treat", "Dutch courage", or "Dutch wife", due to the 'tunnel' being something less than a real tunnel. Sort of the opposite of the common "Devil's + some mundane item" construction. Maybe not the biggest issue the world's facing right now, but it does seem kind of off-color, at least. Particularly since Portland does have direct flights from Amsterdam, or at least we did before the pandemic and might again someday, and renaming the falls and the "tunnel" might prevent a few awkward questions from tourists and maybe an unneccessary diplomatic incident. Again, I don't have any actual evidence for this hypothesis either, just a gut feeling that it's something 19th to mid-20th century Oregonians would've done and would've enjoyed doing. Or maybe it's just that I just don't care for the name, so I assume it's malicious, I dunno.

The name isn't even unique, by the way. It turns out there are at least two more Dutchman-themed waterfalls out there, both in rural Pennsylvania: a Dutchman Falls near one end of the 56 mile Loyalsock Trail, and a Dutchman Run Falls in the McIntyre Wild Area, both roughly the same size as the Oregon one, located on two different creeks both named "Dutchman's Run", about 25 miles apart as the crow flies. And while we're at it, in Pennsylvania the word "Dutchman" might mean Pennsylvania Dutch, which is of course German and not Dutch at all. And with that, we've gone as far as I'm willing to go in trying to explain anything about anything or anyone in, from, or near Pennsylvania, future, past, or present, my mom included.

Switching gears a little, the one weird fact I've run across about this fairly modest waterfall is that it's been run by at least two people in kayaks, and the linked page has photos to prove it. Seems the two kayakers started below Wiesendanger Falls and got out somewhere well above Little Multnomah, after first running a gauntlet of gawking tourists and one very concerned forest ranger -- who, amazingly, let them continue up the trail after they explained they weren't going to attempt the main falls and go splat in front of the normies. One of the kayakers says that Little Multnomah looked runnable too, other than being wayyy too close to "the 550 footer" as they put it, but notes that the creek above Wiesendanger & Ecola Falls is likely too small to be interesting from a kayak standpoint. In any case, that was enough for this stretch of Multnomah Creek to be tagged as a "navigable river" on a page at American Whitewater, and it might count under Oregon state law as well. A 2013 "Where next?" post at Columbia Gorge Whitewater speculated that Ecola Falls (55') and a few others might also be kayak-able, but nobody had tried them yet. As far as I can tell that's still where things stand in 2020, so I guess this challenge is still open, if anyone's looking for a relaxing weekend activity. You won't have to worry about competition from me, at any rate; I guess it's just that I don't grasp the basic physics of how someone can take a little boat over a 189' waterfall (to pick an extreme example from 2010) without ending up as chunky salsa at the end.

So at that point I wondered if people do this at other waterfalls in the Gorge, and I just didn't know about it until now, and the answer to that varies place by place. It seems that Eagle Creek was known for it back before the fire, and people have tried it once or twice in a few other places. Here's what I came across, going roughly west to east:

  • Bridal Veil Creek has been done, including the 'main' falls next to the highway, as well as the rarely visited Middle Falls upstream of there.
  • Someone ran at least one of the falls along Oneonta Creek way back in 2001.
  • Tanner Creek including Wahclella Falls, I think by the same guy who did 189' Palouse Falls in the YT link further up. A blog post about that explains that going over Wahclella Falls involves a long roundabout hike to get above the falls, then an assistant/enabler lowers you into place and cuts the rope holding you when you're ready to go. A Northwest Livin' blog post from around that time has a bunch of photos from a scouting trip to the top of Wahclella Falls and some of the smaller waterfalls upstream from there.
  • As mentioned above, Eagle Creek (or a portion of it) is considered tough but doable by kayak or even by inner tube (although I imagine it really helps to be an expert who just happens to be on an inner tube at the moment)
  • Herman Creek has been done at least once. An interesting detail to this is that local off-trail hiking folks had argued for years about whether there are any waterfalls at all along Herman Creek; for part of its length the creek flows in a tight slot canyon that's tough to even see down into, and impossible to get into on foot, and the trail shies away from this stretch of the creek, so you go for a while hearing whitewater in the distance but never catching a glimpse of it. The kayakers encountered -- and where possible went over -- at least four waterfalls and a couple of large rapids that might count too. A consistent theme in these trip reports is that various creeks (like this one) would be amazing if they'd just clean out some of the old logs and trees that have accumulated over time; the problem there is that Herman Creek is a rare bit of viable salmon habitat on the Oregon side of the Gorge, and woody debris is essential habitat for baby salmon, and a 2014 report argued that there was actually too little LWD ("Large Woody Debris") in the creek, not too much of it. So this may be another ugly land use battle we can look forward to someday.
  • Out past Hood River, Mosier Creek Falls can be run in a raft if there's enough water going over it. This happened long enough ago that I actually mentioned it in a post about the falls and then completely forgot that this was an activity that exists.
  • On the Washington side of the river, there's Lacamas Creek just outside Camas. (A place that I really ought to finish my long-stalled draft post about, come to think of it.) The easy way to kayak here involves paddling around Lacamas Lake and maybe upstream the creek a bit from there. Or the harder way is across the street and downtstream from the calm lake, where you drop in at the spillway just below the dam, and run that and then the two big waterfalls downstream. Here's a short video showing the harder way.
  • And then, wandering away from the Gorge to other things it occurrd to me to search on, the lower falls at White River Falls (aka "Celestial Falls") used to be extremely popular, but going over the falls in a boat is currently banned by Oregon State Parks because reasons.
  • Boats of all shapes and kinds are also banned at nearby Sherars Falls, but without the clamor to unban it like there is with White River Falls. People seem to generally agree that it's just too dangerous. An American Whitewater page describing river conditons there just says "null", in a somewhat ominous website error.
  • It sounds like all forms of boating anywhere in Silver Falls State Park have been illegal for quite some time, but a part of Silver Creek downstream of North Falls is runnable so long as you avoid Officer Friendly and nobody narks on you. (The linked page has some hints on not getting caught by The Man, which Legal says I have to tell you not to try.) Eventually the creek flows down and out of the park and goes over a series of smaller waterfalls (which don't have hiking trails to them) and you only have to worry about offended/bewildered local landowners and then a long boring float/paddle back into Silverton.
  • Also doable are some waterfalls falls along McDowell Creek, which is sort of a mini-Silver Falls near Sweet Home.
  • A couple of kayakers even went down Willamette Falls a few years ago, albeit on one of the parts that's been concreted over so it's more like a dam spillway than a natural waterfall. This being a very public place -- and because I'm not the only one who isn't clear on how any of this stuff is survivable -- people saw it and called 911 on the natural assumption they'd just seen a horrible accident, triggering a search-and-rescue operation. Though if more people paid attention to local history they'd know the falls were negotiated at least twice in a barrel, Niagara-style, way back in 1895 (the first time on a double bill with a hot air balloonist, I guess to boost the odds at least one of the attempts would succeed). So repeating this feat in a modern kayak ought to be a piece of cake, right? That said, the gentleman who pulled off the 1895 stunt died a few months later while trying to descend an Idaho log flume in a barrel, so his success here may have been more due to luck than skill and meticulous preparation. Still, that was a completely different stunt in a different state, and maybe it doesn't count. A much more popular thing to do in these modern litigious times is to put in below the falls and paddle up to it. This is bound to be a more sedate experience than going over the falls, and at any rate is the only legal way to see the falls up close as of 2020.
  • And something that's not a waterfall at all, but a brief episode in 2010 when Oswego Lake was being drained for sewer work, which briefly made Oswego Creek kayak-able downstream of the dam.

Sunday, November 22, 2020

Little Multnomah Falls

Somewhere around 3rd or 4th grade, my parents decided my younger siblings and I were old enough to try the hike all the way to the top of Multnomah Falls without endangering ourselves, each other, or anyone else, and probably no more than one of us would need to be carried at a time. I was thrilled. Until then we only ever went as far as the Benson Bridge and over to the the base of the upper falls (which has been closed since a major rockslide in 1995). From there I'd seen people waving from the very top, and asked repeatedly if we could go the rest of the way, and had been told maybe when we were older. So when the time finally came, I was not the one who needed carrying. I have a vague memory of having to wait repeatedly for everyone else to catch up.

After this long adventure and what seemed like endless switchbacks, we finally got to the sketchy little wood platform at the top. The view was amazing, of course, and I successfully picked out our car in the parking lot far below from all the other enormous 1970s sedans. The thing that really struck me the most, though, was that right behind you, just upstream from the main waterfall, was another small one maybe 15'-20' high that you couldn't see from down below, and that none of the maps or signs had mentioned. Afterward, I excitedly told everyone I knew about this amazing new discovery -- teachers, other kids at school, neighbors, librarians, relatives from out of town, probably strangers at the mall -- and was a little surprised by how few people seemed to care about secret waterfalls, or were willing to play along, or got the same uncomprehending expression they did when I was excitedly reeling off important facts about outer space or sharks or dinosaurs. I was kind of a weird kid, in retrospect. You may have already suspected that was the case, and that's fine.

(I also wanted to keep going on the trail after that and see where it went, but couldn't convince my parents to go any further or let me run on ahead unattended. Which puzzled me at the time, as I'd had this hilarious notion that grownups never get tired. Please note that your humble correspondent is is typing this while facing yet another birthday ending in a zero in a few weeks.)

Skipping forward to roughly the present day, it occurred to me that I had a decent pile of photos of all the waterfalls along the Larch Mountain Trail and the Multnomah-Wahkeena Loop, taken on enough occasions that I've lost track. So I thought it might be interesting to do a separate blog post for each of them, each with my usual hodgepodge of fun(?) facts, historical tidbits, unsolicited opinions, and whatnot. Partly because doing that research is fun in itself, and partly so the ginormous KML map for this humble blog will have an accurate placemark for each of them, once I get around to updating it again. And partly so I could get some additional mileage out of existing photos instead of having to go out and take fresh ones during a cold rainy fall/winter/spring. Or, as it turns out, those conditions plus an ongoing deadly global pandemic.

For what it's worth, an early draft of this post insisted it was an ironclad rule here that every waterfall gets its own post, because placemarks, but then I went looking for examples and realized I've only actually done mini-projects like this a couple of other times. Silver Falls, McDowell Creek, the Lewis River, probably a few others that don't come to mind immediately. I was going to say Latourell Creek too, since I've done the Lower and Upper falls there, but Google Maps recently added a "Clara Falls" between the two that I know nothing about, so I'm not sure what's going on there. There aren't any other search results about it on the net, so far as I know it's possible someone who knows how to add things to Google Maps went ahead and added it. Might be named after the person doing the naming, or a family member, a pet, maybe a minor Disney character, who knows.

On diving into this little project, I was surprised to realize that depending on which source you consulted and when, there are anywhere between one and five waterfalls on Multnomah Creek upstream of Multnomah Falls. In (literally) ascending order, the full list of five is:

  1. Little Multnomah Falls, the subject of the current post
  2. Dutchman Falls
  3. Wiesendanger Falls
  4. Ecola Falls
  5. a small, seemingly-unnamed one upstream of Ecola & before the Wahkeena Trail junction

Up until the late 1990s, Wiesendanger and Ecola were often lumped together as two parts of a single waterfall, so the count was either one or two depending on whether then-unnamed Dutchman was worth counting. The current consensus is that the middle three on the list count and the others don't. Of the remaining two, one (this one) is a sentimental favorite, and the other is a spot I've stopped and taken photos of on at least three separate occasions without realizing at first that it was the same place each time, and I've found a few photos of it from other people, so it feels like that requires some sort of followup.

The issue with Little Multnomah Falls is a pedantic one, of the lumping vs. splitting variety. As in, is it lumped in as part of Multnomah Falls, or split off as a separate waterfall? On one hand the experts agree that there's no such thing as "Little Multnomah Falls" and this is just the tiny uppermost tier of Multnomah Falls. Which, sure, it's right there behind the Multnomah Falls viewpoint. On the other hand, the stats you normally see for Multnomah Falls say two tiers, with the height of the two adding up to the overall height, which is either the traditional 620', or the 611' they settled on a few years ago after measuring again. The only exception being Waterfalls Northwest which says 3 drops and a total height of 635', but I haven't seen anyone else use those numbers. So on one hand it's too close to count as separate, but it also isn't being counted as part of Multnomah Falls. So that's kind of a puzzle, if you care about this sort of thing.

Incidentally, there's a whole separate argument about whether Multnomah Falls is even the tallest in Oregon, with or without the little extra bit at the top. The linked Salem Statesman-Journal article lists several promising candidates, all in remote corners of the Cascades and the Wallowas.

To wander even further off topic for a moment, another article linked from that one ponders what (if anything) to do with the newly designated Devil's Staircase Wilderness, along the Umpqua River as it passes through the southern Coast Range. Apparently this 30,000 acre area has never been logged, has no trails, and just one former Forest Service road that was built and then quickly abandoned many years ago. So it stayed a blank spot on the map that nobody paid any attention to, and some people want to keep it that way, while others think it could use at least a trail or two, possibly to access the area's namesake waterfall.

Meanwhile an Oregonian article points out that the oft-repeated claim about Multnomah being the 2nd tallest in the USA is not even remotely true, just like Forest Park isn't the biggest city park on the planet, and Mt. Tabor isn't the world's only volcano within city limits, or even the only one within Portland city limits. We did have the largest US flag and flagpole for a while, but Portland lost interest in that arms race decades ago. Mill Ends may still be the smallest park, as we've attracted surprisingly few competitors for that particular crown. If someone did get the idea to fight us for those tiny honors, I imagine we could persuade Intel to make us a new microscopic one, say 10x10 nanometers. Which is great until the city of Taipei convinces TSMC to make them a 7x7 nanometer city park and Intel can't catch up. But I digress.

This is usually the point where I dive into the local library's archives of The Oregonian, stretching back to the 1850s, but that was spectacularly unhelpful this time around. I can tell you the name "Little Multnomah Falls" has never appeared in the local paper in all this time, and there are too many references to the viewpoint for me to wade through. So instead I've got one of those "Links from Around the Interwebs" things, where I apply my l33t search engine ski11z and throw together a big lightly-curated list of stuff that came up. So here's what I've got this time around:

Saturday, November 07, 2020

Flipping off Mar-a-Lago

Ok, here are a few photos I took back in August 2018 and saved for a special occasion that turned out to be today. I was in Florida to watch the Parker Solar Probe launch and had some free time afterward before I had to fly home, so I figured I'd go wander around Miami and the Everglades for a few days since I'd never been there before. (And, um, I'm bound to finish those blog posts eventually, but that's a whole separate issue.) On the way back, I made a little side trip out to Palm Beach to indulge one of my more petty hobbies, flipping off properties that belong to a certain soon-to-be ex-President. I have only actually done this twice (because it's a silly hobby and I'm not going to invest a lot of time or gas money into it): First for his ugly Waikiki hotel, and then this set of photos for Mar-a-Lago, his infamous private club near the beach.

Taking these wasn't eventful at all; I just sort of rolled by, took my photos without stopping, and continued on my way back to Orlando. I can't say it was a highlight of the trip as a whole, but it broke up the monotony of the drive, and it was mildly fascinating to see it in person. It's hard to explain, but as tacky as the place looks here, it's somehow even more tacky in person. In particular, the famous tower on top looks like one of the decorative faux-Spanish towers at a thousand California minimalls, maybe a bit toward the upscale end. It also felt weirdly menacing; it's tough to disentangle the building and its owner, of course, but looking at it it's easy to imagine that really bad things have happened there, and other bad things have been planned there, and that this badness is ongoing, maybe escalating. Honestly the whole surrounding area felt that way, as if his personality had bled into the soil like a leaky septic tank.

One weird detail about the place is that before Trump owned it, it spent a number of years as the most useless and expensive white elephant in the US national park system, deemed unusable as a presidential retreat or as a museum open to the general public, but with exorbitant maintenance costs anyway. They were happy to be rid of it -- which almost never happens -- and almost certainly won't want it back once Trump is done with it. So while it's bound to remain a pilgrimage spot for the world's nazis and braying dipshits, at least it won't happen at taxpayer expense. And given the local geography they'll need scuba gear to visit within a few more decades. Maybe at that point any part of the tower that isn't underwater could be repurposed as a sort of monument to climate denial, I dunno.

Anyway, good riddance.

Saturday, October 24, 2020

Beaver Falls

Ok, next up we're doing the short hike to Beaver Falls, along a stretch of the old Columbia River Highway between Rainier and Clatskanie, on the way to Astoria. This waterfall is not exactly famous, and the surrounding area isn't touristy, and the present-day road doesn't look particularly significant, and this would be a prime opportunity for me to score some hipster points explaining how incredibly obscure everything is, if hipster points were a thing worth having. Right up there with listing off bands nobody on the planet has ever heard of, or chuckling when someone mispronounces your favorite artisanal goat breed, or whatever.

For readers outside the Northwest, or who aren't familiar with this ongoing occasional project of mine, here's a little background. The original Columbia River Highway was a major engineering project of the early 20th century, promoted as the region's first 'modern' road -- by Model T-era standards -- with one section heading east from Portland to The Dalles and points east -- including the famous tourist-clogged stretch through the Columbia River Gorge -- and another leg (the Lower Columbia River Highway) going westbound to Astoria and the coast. The highway was designed to showcase the region, wandering around the landscape in search of waterfalls and other scenery, with state-of-the-art concrete bridges, and walls and other structures built by Italian stone masons. Unfortunately as the only modern road in the area, and the only road at all in some areas, it made itself obsolete almost immediately thanks to induced demand & was replaced by bigger, better, faster, wider, straighter ultra-modern boring roads starting in the 1940s, with this stretch getting the treatment in 1955.

As with the eastern leg of the highway, the bypassed bits and pieces of the old road typically became lightly-used side roads or were abandoned entirely, and scenic highlights along these parts quickly faded into obscurity. But unlike the stretch through the Gorge, the surviving parts on the way to Astoria don't have road signs, or shiny new ODOT-funded bike paths, or glossy guidebooks, or really any publicity at all. But the roads themselves are still there, and the scenic bits that were there a century ago are still there, if you know where to look. The waterfalls are maybe not of the same scale or quantity as in the Gorge -- which is famous for a reason -- but fame draws crowds, and like a lot of people I'm all about avoiding crowds right now. Beaver Falls did get a brief bit of attention back in July when an Oregonian article covered it as one of several waterfalls that weren't barricaded off for the ongoing pandemic. Which actually was very useful information, since nobody seems to be tracking which destinations are currently open and which aren't across the region, and I'm not inclined to make the long drive without knowing that little detail.

I think I ought to start by explaining how to get there, or at least how I got there, and then I'll get to the trail and the falls themselves. The fastest and easiest way -- which is not what I did -- is to just stay on US 30 westbound past Rainier until the the turnoff for Beaver Falls Road at the tiny sorta-town of Delena, then stay on the road for another 3.6 miles. You'll see an unsigned parking lot on your left with room for maybe a dozen cars (this is a guess; I did not actually count the cars when I was there). GPS coordinates for the parking lot, not the falls, are 46.1038712, -123.1282997, if that helps at all.

As for what I actually did, I'd noticed that there was another stretch of the old highway starting in downtown Rainier, and I wanted to see what it was like while I was in the area. Rainier and Clatskanie are both right at river level, but there's a hill between them, and the Columbia bends north for a bit at that point and then back. So to go between the two towns you either follow the river several miles out of the way (like the railroad line does), or go over the hill, which is what both the old and current highways do. But while today's US 30 just goes directly up and over the hill and down the other side, the original route made several switchbacks ascending from downtown Rainier, and then followed Beaver Creek down the other side before bending south into downtown Clatskanie.

I haven't figured out how to embed a Google map with custom directions -- I could swear I've done that before, but now the embeddable map reverts to the default route on US 30, which I don't want -- but at least I can still make a link showing the old route, so you can see what it looks like in another tab. As you can see there, the old route (which now goes by "Old Rainier Road") starts south of 30, at the west end of downtown Rainier. By accident I actually turned off 30 a bit before the map does, and drove around in downtown Rainier a bit looking for where I'd planned to be, and ran across an unrelated historic bridge in the process, but didn't stop for photos & eventually found the turn I wanted. In any case, it climbs the hill via the switchbacks I mentioned, but unfortunately this stretch of the old highway clearly hasn't been paved in ages, and the forest around it is overgrown and starting to encroach on the road, giving that stretch a weird claustrophobic feel. Parts of the road have very old guardrails that might date back to the state highway days; these are in poor shape, unfortunately, and it's clear they've been crashed into a lot over however many decades they've been there.

A note at Recreating the HCRH says there was once a state highway wayside somewhere along this stretch (the "Ditto Wayside", named for local philanthropists), with a trail to some nearby springs. But there isn't a wayside or viewpoint here now, nor is there much of a view anymore thanks to trees growing over the last century or so. I even checked the Columbia County GIS system out of curiosity, in case it was still there somewhere but overgrown and forgotten, but it shows no public property nearby, so maybe the state unloaded it after the road stopped being a state highway.

At the top of the hill the road improves and you're in ordinary rural country for a while til you get back to US 30 at the tiny burg of Alston, with the next segment of old road just across the highway. The intersection is a little sketchy, but there's bound to be a gap in traffic eventually and then you can scoot across when nobody's looking. The road heads west from there as Alston Rd. for a few blocks, and then you have to merge onto 30 just for a few hundred feet or so before leaving it again at the Beaver Falls Road turnoff I mentioned earlier.

So however you got to Beaver Falls Road, one thing you'll notice on the way to the trailhead is that the road crosses and recrosses Beaver Creek several times on old bridges that look original to the century-old road, or at least inspired by the originals. Somewhere along that stretch, two miles upstream from Beaver Falls is where you'd stop to go look at Upper Beaver Falls, if only you knew where to stop. I wasn't sure where it was, exactly, so I skipped that side trip and continued on to the main event. The parking lot for the main falls was easier to find, since there were other cars there and a seasonal official sign next to the trailhead warning visitors about county forest fire rules. A blog post from February 2017 I ran across showed no such list of rules or any other sort of sign for the falls, so knowing you're in the right place might be a little harder in the off season.

From the trailhead, a short but kind of rocky trail leads down to the falls. I should point out that photos taken in August will not really do the falls justice; unlike falls in the Gorge, Beaver Creek doesn't have high altitude snowmelt feeding it in the summer, and it dwindles to a fraction of its winter and springtime volume. August is when I got the idea to go visit, and I sadly don't have a way to fast-forward us all to maybe mid-April 2021 so we can go see them then instead. And the additional tradeoff with waiting until next spring is that I gather the trail gets slippery and treacherous when wet. It also would've helped, photo-wise, if I'd stopped by at any time of day other than when the sun was directly above the falls and you have to bob and weave and shade your phone with one hand trying to keep both the sun and your hand out of your shot. All I can say to that is that I certainly wanted to take quality photos of the falls, but sleeping in on weekend mornings is also pretty great, and I feel like I struck a reasonable balance among several competing priorities. I may go back at some point to find the other waterfall upstream and maybe take some bridge photos if there's anywhere to park to do that. If I do that, I may give Beaver Falls another try too, and the upper falls too if I can find them.

I should point out herethat that although the wider world may have forgotten Beaver Falls, it's still a popular local swimming hole, and there were more people there than I would've preferred to encounter while hiking during a pandemic, and mask use was far from universal (ugh), though I obviously lived to tell the tale this time. The falls are about 50 feet high, with a deep pool at the base, and teens were jumping from the top of the falls while I was there. I suppose they've probably all done this hundreds of times and learned how from older teens, and almost nobody ever lands headfirst or hits a rock or tangles with the submerged car wreckage the Oregonian article insists is somewhere down in the deep pool below the falls. But it still stressed me out a little. I don't really have a rational basis for this, just a random worry someone might try an extreme new stunt for the first time just then and it would go badly, I guess. Everybody was fine; I just didn't stay as long as I would have, otherwise. Retraced my steps back to the parking lot, then continued along the remaining bit of old highway into Clatskanie, and got on present-day Highway 30 to head home.

For what it's worth, I did actually verify this is a county park and not just a traditional local trespassin' spot where the owner almost never shows up with a shotgun. I kind of like to double-check that sort of thing before encouraging random internet strangers to do something I did. It's not shown as a park on Google Maps, nor is it listed on the county parks website, so I figured it was at least an open question. So I checked the county GIS system again and sure enough, the system says it's called "Beaver Falls Park", 29.06 acres, with a map tax lot number of 7412-00-00601, in case anyone out there wants to triple-check my double-checking. I gather that the county classifies it as "unimproved" despite the trail and the parking lot, which may be why they don't really advertise that it exists, and why they stick to encouraging you not to set the forest on fire, and don't post any friendly "Welcome to Beaver Falls County Park, this way to the falls, lodge and spa that way." signage. The trail is surprisingly new, too; the county updated the master plan for its 24 parks in 2007, and putting in a trail was one of the suggested future improvements back then. In 2009 there was an ODOT-funded road project [doc] here, repaving this stretch of road, installing vintage-looking guardrails, and adding fencing so people could safely view the falls from the road. It doesn't mention anything about working on parking at the trailhead, or about a trailhead existing at that point, but I'm not sure whether that counts as a data point.

I kept reading that Beaver Falls was much more well-known decades ago, and faded out of public awareness after the highway was rerouted. Which stands to reason, I guess, but it made wonder whether the falls had ever been all that famous, and if so, what it had been like back in that era. So I took another dive back into the local library's historic newspaper databases to see if I could find anything interesting about the place, whether about the falls themselves, the highway and how it came to be, the doings of local residents in the Greater Beaver Falls metro area, that sort of thing. The finished product ended up as more of a story about the road than the falls, and to some degree about reporters who covered the new road, and various old cars they made the journey in.

Let me point out that "Beaver Falls" is not one of the easier keyword searches, so I might have missed a thing or two while wading through all the noise. The Northwest's early US settlers seem to have been a literal-minded, unimaginative bunch, so except for a few places where they decided to swipe an existing native name, places ended up with generic names like "Beaver Falls" and "Beaver Creek", along with Deer, Eagle, Salmon, etc. creeks. A Gnat Creek exists elsewhere in the northern coast range, and it apparently sports a few waterfalls too, though the name may cut down on the tourist trade. Other uncreative names include Whale Cove, Elk Rock, Wildcat Mountain, probably all named due to some early pioneer seeing an animal nearby. And when they didn't name a creek after an animal, they went with some mundane aspect of the creek: Big Creeek, or Deep, or Silver (as in whitewater); or Mill Creek if somebody built a sawmill on a creek before naming the creek; or if the first thing they noticed was a waterfall, Fall Creek, or maybe Falls Creek if they saw more than one. And then falls are often named after the creek, like Pup Creek Falls recently. The falls here have sometimes gone by Beaver Creek Falls. Fall Creek Falls is not uncommon, and elsewhere in the state there's a Falls City Falls, in which the falls are named for the town that's named for the falls. If another waterfall is found later and it needs a name too, it becomes Upper or Lower Animal Creek Falls. If the creek forks, you get stuff like North and South Falls at Silver Falls State Park, and yes, there's an Upper North Falls.

So the oldest mention of the 'right' Beaver Falls that I ran across was an April 2nd 1899 news item (predating the highway by roughly 20 years) relating someone's visit to the falls during a recent fishing trip. It describes the falls much as they are today, albeit with very different directions for getting there:

The falls are eight miles from Mayger's Landing on the Columbia River, and six miles from Beaver Station, on the Astoria railroad. The county road to Beaver Valley, in good weather, is passable for bicycles. From the end of the county road to the falls is about 1 1/2 miles on a poor trail, through the brush and in the bed of the creek.
The article was published as a small item on that day's Woman's Page. Much of of the rest of the page is devoted to 1899's most fashionable looks for Easter direct from New York and abroad, meaning lots of corsets and embroidery, and elaborate hats with feathers from the world's endangered birds.

The next mention of the Beaver Falls area came in 1909, as Columbia County voted on adopting Prohibition countywide. Voters rejected the idea (though it eventually passed statewide in 1914), with Clatskanie rejecting it narrowly and Rainier by a nearly 2:1 margin. At press time, results were not yet in for Beaver Falls and a couple of other then-remote precincts. The article states they were expected to vote majority-dry, though it's not clear how or why the writer would have known that.

Then we get to the origins of the old highway, starting with "Boulevard to Pacific Ocean Would Be Scenic Marvel", February 18th 1912. In which department store magnate (and future governor) Julius Meier explained in great detail how amazing it would be if there was a road to the coast -- which he insisted would be both practical and affordable -- and announced he was forming a lobbying group to bring this road into being. It seems that Clatskanie-area boosters were the ones who had first sold him on this route, and so Meier spent a large portion of the article explaining how their stretch of the Lower Columbia region would soon be densely populated and incredibly prosperous, perhaps a second Holland in the making. (Many wetlands along the river were being diked and drained for farming around this time, so there was a superficial resemblance). Toward the end he pointed out that Portland would need to kick in some cash toward the road, as Clatskanie had not, as yet, made a great deal of progress toward its destiny as a future Amsterdam-on-the-Columbia.

Meier apparently had enough pull with his fellow movers and shakers that the road was already in the works by October of that year, with the eventual route largely decided upon, including the route along Beaver Creek on the way to Clatskanie. In an October 13th 2012 article "Bowlby Opines on Highway Plan", highway promoters had invited Major H.L. Bowlby -- former Washington highway commissioner, and current head of the Pacific Highway Association, a "Good Roads" lobbying group -- to travel the proposed route and offer his expert opinions on the project. He was enthusiastic overall, with a few minor quibbles and some platitudes about listening to the locals while planning the final route. He went on to explain that these sorts of projects were usually financed with public bond measures and paid off over 20 or 30 years, and the proposed highway would likely need to do this.

County voters passed the needed bond measure in February 1914 by a vote of 1695 to 1162. The measure came to $360k overall (about $9,357,048 in 2020 dollars), with $260k of that dedicated to the new highway, and the balance spread around the inland parts of the county to try to win support for the measure. Which largely didn't work; the vote breakdown by precinct showed lopsided votes in favor from cities and towns along the proposed highway route -- the riverside mill town of Prescott voting 45 to 1 in favor, as an extreme example -- and lopsided votes against it elsewhere, with the inland town of Yankton voting 9 to 112 against the idea. The most historically significant detail of this election is mentioned in a brief aside: "A total vote of 2857 was cast, in most places the women taking an active part in the voting.". Women's suffrage had finally been approved by the state's all-male electorate in 1912, on the sixth attempt, so this special election would have been the first, or among the first, that did not disenfranchise a majority of the population. The article spent more words assuring voters that the county already had a project manager lined up and construction ought to begin in early spring.

Skipping forward a year, it turns out that Maj. Bowlby's 1912 visit had been more of a job interview than a consulting gig, and he'd landed the overall chief engineering job for the Portland-to-Astoria stretch of the highway. Unfortunately things were not going well. In an article "Columbia County Faces Road Crisis" (March 12th 1915), we learn that the project was substantially over budget, and the county was already running low on cash despite the earlier bond measure. The entire county court had recently been recalled and replaced because of the troubled project, and some residents were calling for Bowlby to be fired, largely from the south side of the county (St. Helens & Scappoose), which had not received a lot of new roadwork at that point in the project. The idea was that the south side already had adequate roads to Portland so the route of the highway would use them rather than building a new road, at least for the time being. Which to me sounds like the right decision, financially, but locals just saw construction being weighted heavily toward Rainier & Clatskanie and were jealous about it. The article includes a couple of grainy photos, one of a large rock wall similar to those on the more famous parts of the highway thru the Gorge, and another of some dignitaries looking at a completed section of road. These photos were in relation to a recent construction incident where some brand-new dry stonework along the road had collapsed. An assistant state highway engineer responsible for day-to-day operations blamed the collapse on contractors' use of cheap non-Italian labor.

He has a theory that the Italian workmen alone know how to build dry walls; that the art was handed down to them from the ancient Romans, whose walls in various parts of Europe remain standing after centuries of use.

The scandal stayed in the headlines over the next few days. In "Misunderstanding of Finances Cause of Columbia Road Crisis" (March 16th 1915), we learn more about how the county got itself into this pickle. It seems that one reason locals were so upset over cost overruns was that during the bond measure campaign, pro-highway advocates had promised, or at least strongly implied, that state government matching funds would pay for a big chunk of the project. It turned out, post-election, that pro-road advocates weren't actually authorized to make any such promise on behalf of the state, and precisely zero dollars arrived from Salem after county voters agreed to kick in their chunk of the tab. The article points out that the entire state highway department budget was only $240k per year at the time and the state simply didn't have that kind of money.

The March 16th article also has two photos; one of Beaver Falls, with a narrow wooden footbridge above it, and another of a modern concrete bridge over the creek. The footbridge above the falls would have been associated with a sawmill that operated above the falls until around 1917, when the local supply of trees worth cutting had been depleted. The original plan at the mill had been to build a splash dam above the falls: You build a temporary dam, let it fill with water and dump all of your logs into it until it's nice and full. Then you break the dam, and let the resulting flash flood wash your logs downstream to somewhere where you can collect them at your leisure. Which I guess could be a practical way to move logs around without building any roads or railroad tracks, assuming you'd done the math right and had stored up enough water to get your logs from point A to point B. The people behind this scheme had not done their math right, and promptly went bankrupt.

In any case, another article "Bowlby Crisis Now Delays Road Work" appeared the next day (March 17th 1915), rehashing the many complaints about Bowlby and his project. The primary ones being that the road was going to cost more than residents felt they'd been promised; that it was also taking longer than promised, in part due to fights with contractors and some ugly eminent domain battles; and that Bowlby was somehow overspending on surveying and design work. Apart from the eminent domain stuff, a lot of that sounds eerily familiar to me even though over a century has passed and I just make software and not highways. A new additional anti-Bowlby complaint was that the route of the highway through St. Helens would bypass the city center and instead run parallel to an existing rail line a mile outside town. Which seems like a fair complaint, honestly; bypassing the county seat and largest town that way does seem like a strange thing to do. However it's also undoubtedly the reason central St. Helens remains cute and historic today. So that actually paid off in the end, though there was no way the people of 1915 could have known that. The article largely stems from an interview with one of the county court members ousted in the earlier recall, so the listed complaints were not exactly coming from an unbiased obbserver.

So this project that was in familiar trouble was faced with the same eternal engineering tradeoff as every other troubled project since the beginning of time. You have three options: You can add resources -- more money, more workers, etc. -- but there was clearly no more money to be had just then; you can stretch out the schedule -- but the previous articles made it clear the public & authorities were already restless over how long it was taking; or you can satisfy the previous two constraints by just doing less -- cutting the scope of the project, or the quality of the finished product. One of the links above -- and I forgot to make a note as to which one -- indicated they'd found a few areas where they could save money and time by just not building a few stretches of the road at first, where there was an existing road they could make do with for now. I'm not sure what this was called in 1915; a more contemporary term is "value engineering", and in the software world you're delivering an MVP, or Minimum Viable Product. So they figured out what their MVP looked like: 1.) Given a sufficiently powerful contemporary car, you could start driving from Portland in the morning, and arrive at the beach in time for dinner. and 2.) Some nontrivial part of the road had to be new or improved, so voters could see they'd gotten some return on their investment. And I've been involved in enough of these things to know the implicit 3rd item: The missing parts you didn't have time or money to build or debug are just annoying enough that it shakes loose additional funding to finish the job. But not so annoying that people switch back to the train, or try a different road, or go with a competing software product. With all of that in mind, a big gala grand opening celebration was scheduled for August 1915, just a few months away.

The PR blitz for the new road ramped up weeks ahead of the big day. In a July 18th article, "Julius L. Meier One of the First to Urge Lower Columbia Highway", the paper offered a glowing -- even fawning -- profile going on and on about Meier's foresight in recognizing the need for the road, and his practical ability in organizing the pro-road campaign, and then went on and on about how much prosperity was coming now that the road was (supposedly) almost a reality. This was quickly followed by "Columbia Highway Beauty Described", August 8th, by Meier himself. Among the highlights he mentions are the stone work along the highway at Prescott Point, near Goble; the highway loops ascending Bugby Heights (formerly Bugby Mountain); and the view from the hilltop outside Rainier. Beaver Creek only got a brief mention in connection with the new highway eventually opening up the area to farming, since they ony wanted to talk about the finished parts of the road just then, and the Beaver Creek part was nowhere near being done.

The long-awaited grand opening was chronicled in "Columbia Highway to Sea Christened", August 13th, in which a 40-car convoy of dignitaries made the 135-mile journey from Portland to Astoria, and then down the coast to the ritzy resort town of Gearhart, in less than seven hours, not counting stops for grand opening ceremonies in various towns along the way, or for digging Meier's car (also carrying the governor and one of the state's US Senators) out of sand it had gotten stuck in further toward the coast. The stretch between Rainier and Clatskanie wasn't complete yet -- the article explains there were just a few bridges over Beaver Creek that weren't finished -- and the convoy had to use a steep, rustic forest road for that portion of their expedition.

Cadillac "8" Makes First Trip Over Highway to Sea, August 15th, a lengthy first-person account from a car The Oregonian sent out ahead of the big convoy. Strictly speaking the journalists were guests of the car's owner, and the paper didn't splurge on a new Cadillac for the occasion. The article raves about the car almost as much as the road. The article claimed Little Jack Falls (along a now-abandoned stretch of highway near Prescott, south of Rainier) was the only waterfall along the road, which would have been true at the time, as nearby Jack Falls tends to dry up in the summer. They had gotten lost heading west from Rainier, and then were unsure of the route again at Delena, so they may have been nowhere near Beaver Falls. The article makes it very clear that the road was still very much under constructon along much of its route, and they kept encountering road crews making frantic last-minute fixes ahead of the dignitaries' arrival.

"Reo Makes Astoria Run in Five Hours", September 12th 1915. This was by Chester A. Moores, the paper's auto editor -- who also wrote the recent Cadillac piece -- and covered largely the same trip as the previous articles. By this point a journey like this had already moved off the front page to the paper's automobile section, next to the car ads. Readers were reassured that you didn't to splurge on a Cadillac to get to the beach; the solidly middle-class REO was up to the job and could even take a turn at rescuing other motorists whose less-sturdy vehicles couldn't handle some downhill sections of the road. (A new REO touring car started at $1250 in 1915 dollars, about $32k now, while a new Cadillac "8" Type 51 started at $1975, roughly $51k in 2020 money). The article has a photo of Little Jack Falls (which the highway ran right at the base of) and another of the long climb up Clatsop Crest (formerly Bugby Heights), and describes the Clatskanie area as a miniature Holland. In other 1915 automotive news, remote starting of a car via the miracle of radio waves was being demonstrated for the first time at the Indiana State Fair: Every five minutes, crowds were wowed by a Model 83 Overland being started by a signal from the Overland factory five miles away, sent by a large and very stationary transmitter. So not exactly a practical device yet. Also the state highway department had issued a statement clarifying how the new auto registration laws worked, confirming that yes, in general you would have to pay the full $2 annual registration fee even if you'd owned the car for less than a year, although if you'd owned it for a month or less when the fees came due you only had to pay $1. And a Chigago gentleman named Otto Nordbo was seeking a car manufacturer to sponsor him as he proposed to drive from New York to San Francisco without eating. He claimed this would demonstrate just how safe modern cars were, and insisted that he knew what he was doing, as he had previously completed a 30 day fast, albeit without driving anywhere.

Moores made the trip again in August 1916, this time riding along with the local Kissel Kar dealer in a shiny new Hundred-Point Six. The car's big claim to fame was that it had both a convertible top for the summer (as seen in the article), and a removable hardtop for the rest of the year. Like many of the era's smaller car companies, Kissel fell on hard times in the Depression and stopped making cars in 1930, per an owners' club history. Moores's account pointed out a number of still-unfinished spots along the highway, but found nothing impassable along the way. Following local advice in Rainier, the adventurers took the longer river route west to Clatskanie, bypassing the whole Beaver Creek area.

Which brings us to a November 26th 1916 article, in which we learn that despite the grand opening, and all the assurances about just a few finishing touches remaining, the Delena-to-Clatskanie segment was still only half-completed over 15 months later, with nine (!) more bridges over Beaver Creek yet to be built. Project officials insisted the road would still be finished by mid-January, after scrounging up another $25k to pay for building it. Half of this money was a donation by Simon Benson, the Portland timber baron and philanthopist. The article explained the new road segment would pass perhaps four or five waterfalls and would be a new highlight of the highway when complete. This was followed by "Cut-Off Through Wonderland of Lower Highway is Now Being Completed Rapidly by Crews, who are Being Paid by S. Benson"December 10th. The article focuses on on Benson's recent donation, and the fact that he had once lived in a tiny cabin in the area when he was young, penniless, and just getting started in the logging industry, which is one of those rags-to-riches stories newspapers have always loved. It mentions he was planning to acquire the land around the old Oregon Lumber Company mill at Beaver Falls and donate it as a park. The article includes several photos, including one of the falls, which at the time were clearly visible from the (still-unpaved) road because the surrounding area had been clearcut quite recently. The article also mentions "Twin Falls" two miles upstream, which I think refers to today's Upper Beaver Falls, unless there's another waterfall upstream that everybody's forgotten about, which is also possible.

An August 1917 article, again by Moores, compared the Lower Columbia Highway to a route further south (present-day Highway 6) as ways to get to and from Astoria, by driving both in a shiny new Hudson Super Six. Moores claimed the Lower Columbia route was shorter -- which it might still be if you're headed to Gearhart -- but the route through the coast range was more scenic, which may also still be true when you aren't being tailgated by angry bros in Porsches, or stuck behind a lumbering RV. The article notes in passing that the Beaver Creek segment was still under construction at this point due to various unfinished bridges. A brief note on March 24th 1918 noted that the state had rejected a bid to build one of the planned Beaver Creek bridges for $6483.60 ($111,252.14 in 2020 dollars) and would go ahead and build it themselves instead.

Moores left the the paper in November 1917 to become private secretary to the governor; he had somehow found time to work his way through law school despite his day job driving all over the Northwest, and passed the bar exam in May. He later went into real estate -- his original beat at the Oregonian before the auto craze hit -- and later ran the Portland Housing Authority during WWII as it built the temporary shipyard housing at Vanport.

Meanwhile the vacant auto editor role, and the "Is the road finished yet?" beat, was taken over by L.H. Gregory, who spent a few years doing this early in his long career. Gregory continued the existing theme: Hitch a ride to Astoria and back in one of the year's hottest new cars, courtesy of a local dealership, take some photos, write another piece about current conditions along the road and any quirky stories or misadventures that occurred along the way. In that spirit, Gregory made the journey in May 1918 in a Series Nine Franklin Six -- Franklin being a small maker of quirky air-cooled cars out of Syracuse, NY. He announced that the road was open, even though they were on detour routes almost the entire distance west of Delena; no progress had been made on the long-delayed Beaver Creek bridges over the winter due to high water. I had to reread the article before realizing he meant the road was open for the season after being impassable all winter, not that it was complete. Gregory called the Franklin "a wonderful road car" and overall seems to have had a great time on this trip, marred only by his companions' complete inability to catch any fish anywhere along the way. (Incidentally, after Franklin went bankrupt in the Depression, the factory was taken over and made Carrier air conditioners until 2011, at which point the plant was demolished and the jobs shipped overseas.)

A June 30th 1918 article informs the reader that the journey to Astoria -- the other of Oregon's "two chief cities", as the article puts it -- could also be made in a Willys Six. The article starts boldly, announcing once again that that the road to Astoria was now open, but quickly gets to the qualifiers: It was not actually complete, despite being open, nor was it officially open yet, despite the grand festivities of summer 1915, and as it turns out "complete" did not necessarily mean the road had been paved or even macadamized (i.e. given the modern gravel road treatment.), though these gaps were no more than 7 or 8 miles and should be closed soon. The article advises readers to avoid the Delena-to-Clatskanie segment because the road right at Beaver Falls was still under heavy construction work, and motorists were being detoured around that spot on a steep, harrowing logging road. This detailed description of what not to do tells us that the writer's party did precisely what the reader is told not to attempt. We are also told the car's owner was a bit of a daredevil, and enjoyed driving around with a hole punched into his muffler to make his car sound faster. At a few points along the road, bystanders scattered as the car approached, and yelled and gestured as it rumbled by at 35mph. The Oregonian, as a family newspaper, did not record what these people were yelling.

"To Clatsop Crest, Lower Columbia Highway, in a Buick", April 20th 1919. In which the Gregory tagged along with a rep from the local Buick dealer, who had called in for advice on a nice Sunday drive, one that was obscure and people probably hadn't heard of, because Portland. They only went as far as Clatsop Crest, as the road continuing on to Astoria was known to be impassable when wet, which was a significant problem as Astoria averages ~191 rainy days per year, and ~18 rainy days in April. The Beaver Creek segment must have finally been open, at least, as the article included photos of both Beaver Falls and Little Jack Falls, the latter with the rep's shiny new Buick parked in front. Gregory mistakenly identified Beaver Creek as the Clatskanie River, but seemed to like what he saw, describing Beaver Falls as both a "Yellowstone Falls in miniature" and "a very baby Niagara", and stating that anyone who could drive by without at least stopping for ten minutes should be barred from the highway forever. The only mishap along the way came later near the Clatsop County line, as the car slipped off some wooden planks and sank up to its axles in deep mud, where a submerged plank full of nails ripped up one of the car's tires. A passing motorist noted that county officials had known about the mud pit since at least the previous November but had not done anything about it, speculating that it was "to show what could be done with a mudhole of that kind, or to spite Clatsop County, 100 yards away".

On August 31st, 1919, readers were treated to at least two accounts of driving to Astoria and back; in one article, two guys in a Mercer (a fast, sleek sports car by 1919 standards) set a new record, making it out to Astoria in 3 hours, 50 minutes, beating the old record by ten minutes. They were slowed down somewhat by two flat tires and what sounds like the same construction detour near Beaver Falls that the paper had complained about a year earlier. Seems that at this point the steep, harrowing logging road had a temporary road surface made of haphazardly laid wooden fence rails. In the second article, Gregory made the now-familiar journey once again, this time in a shiny new Chalmers, driven by the local Chalmers rep, along with their spouses and an artist from the paper who drew another route map for the article. In addition to the unpleasant detour, they also had contend with multiple black cats in the road -- which they gingerly shooed out of the way -- and then they inexplicably ran out of gas way out in the middle of nowhere, even though the Chalmers rep swore up and down that he'd filled the tank the night before.

From there we skip past winter again to February 1920, when paving was finally about to begin along the Beaver Creek section of highway. While paving work slogged along, Gregory did the Astoria run in June in another Franklin, and again in July in a Mitchell Scout. I'm not clear on whether that model would have been an infamous "Drunken Mitchell" -- the company wanted a more sleek and modern look, and angled the radiator by a few degrees, which scandalized the motoring public of 1920 for some reason. Having your car nicknamed "drunken" in the year Prohibition went into effect was probably not great from a marketing standpoint; the company backtracked in the next year's model, but the damage was done and they were out of business by 1923. Anyway, the July article mostly talks about the inland route to Astoria, today's OR 202, and laments that readers needed to go see it within the next couple of years as timber companies were already busy clearcutting adjacent forests right up to the road, with no laws on the books to stop them.

In the midst of all of this, a September 11th 1920 article discussed a proposal to buy Beaver Falls and the surrounding old mill site as a park. As I mentioned earlier, it's a county park now, and I've seen mentions of it being a park at least back to the early 1980s, but I still haven't figured out whether it's been a park for the entire time the road's been there.

"Hot Stuff Going Down on the Lower Columbia Highway", September 12th 1920, published exactly 100 years before I wrote this paragraph. In which Gregory hopped in a shiny new Hupmobile, piloted by the local Hupmobile dealer, to investigate whether the road was done yet. We're told that paving work along the route was nearly complete other than 7.5 miles of gaps here and there, and everything should be open by October 10th, weather permitting. It wasn't clear whether these gaps were the same ones mentioned in the June 1918 article. On the bright side, the under-construction bits closer to Astoria were open when road crews weren't working, and modern personal injury law was decades in the future, so drivers were free to take their chances on the freshly-poured asphalt between 9:30pm and 2:30am daily, and all day on Sundays.

You might have guessed where this was going, given the time of year and the "weather permitting" caveat. In "Paving of Lower Columbia Highway Nears Completion" (October 17th 1920), we learn that it was turning out to be the wettest winter in at least 35 years and it had rained almost nonstop for the previous month, and there were still 4.75 miles of highway left to pave, and of course October is just the start of the long rainy season in this part of the world. The article offers several more photos of the road, and another nice hand-drawn map, but not a new completion date.

That was followed by "Columbia Highway Now Open from Hood River to Astoria", November 14th 1920, which announced the road was finally complete for real this time, with almost no remaining gaps. It seems the state Attorney General had belatedly realized the Highway Commission had no authority to build roads within city limits, or to assist anyone else in any way in doing so, and ordered them to stop. Which left one block of gravel in Astoria, another at Hood River city limits, and the whole length of the road through Rainier. We know all this in detail because Gregory covered the whole route in a shiny new Jordan Six, driven by a guy with the local Jordan dealership. (Jordan was a small maker of upscale cars, largely remembered now for its revolutionary and occasionally scandalous auto ads. The firm cratered in the Great Depression, like a lot of the others we've met.) The article includes more photos, yet another cool hand-drawn map, and a "complete" list of key points along the road with their distances from Portland and Astoria. The list mentions Little Jack Falls but not Beaver Falls, which is odd but not unusual. It could be that because Beaver Falls had missed out on the big dignitary parade of 1915, maybe it had registered with everyone that there was exactly one waterfall along the lower highway, and Beaver Falls was not that waterfall, and there wasn't a second PR blitz in 1920 to convince people otherwise. Dunno.

In any case, with the completion of paving the "Astoria Or Bust" beat quickly stopped being newsworthy, and no further examples of this particular genre graced the Oregonian's pages. Meanwhile, Gregory moved over to the sports page, and remained editor and columnist there until his retirement in 1973. The Oregonian revisited the July 1920 excursion (the Mitchell Scout one) decades later on December 31st 1975 as part of their 125th birthday festivities. A 1976 article explained that the paper's original auto section had been discontinued during the Depression, and the paper's "go drive somewhere and tell us what it was like" columns were scaled back to a single weekly feature, which finally ended in 1974 with the Mideast oil crisis. In 1982 someone at the paper remembered or realized Gregory had briefly been their auto editor decades ago, and some of his original glass plate photos from 1919-1921 were exhibited at that year's Portland Auto Show.

The Oregonian did publish a captioned photo of Beaver Falls on May 7th 1922: "Beaver Creek in High Water Lends Beauty to Lower Columbia Highway"

- photo by Scott Attractive falls bordering highway short distance east of Clatskanie Tourists who travel the lower Columbia river in summer miss much of the beauty which winter and spring bring to this route. Beaver Creek, which parallels the pavement for several miles east of Clatskanie takes the steep grade in riffles, cascades and waterfalls, crossing and recrossing the highway. In winter the stream is quickly swollen with rains on the logged-off hills around it, but in summer it dwindles away to a small creek. Beaver falls, once the power site of a sawmill, but now a ruins, is oneof the most picturesque spots between Portland and Astoria. It marks the high limit which salmon trout and steelheads reach and in early fall and winter its lower stretches are favorite haunts of fishermen from the city.
The accompanying photo shows the same dam and bridge above the falls seen earlier when the mill was operating. Neither are there now, so we have the dam removal narrowed down to an, er, 98 year time window, but that's all the info I've got on that particular detail.

Mentions of Beaver Falls became quite rare after that. There's a 1934 article about the Howard triplets' 18th birthday. Seems they had been born at a logging camp near Beaver Falls in 1916, before the road was complete and it was still a fairly remote area. The triplets had 8 older siblings, the youngest just short of a year old, their mother was 40 when they were born, and they all weighed between 2.5 and 3.5 lbs at birth, were born without a doctor attending, and all survived to at least age 18. Which does actually seem kind of newsworthy, given the era. Because this happened in the early 20th century, there was this little tidbit:

Officials of the state fair board called on the Howards and tried to get their consent to exhibit them at the fair when they were only four months old but the mother refused.
One of the three lived to 1986 and still had a surviving sibling at the time.

In 1940, the WPA Federal Writers Project released Oregon, End of the Trail, a tourist guidebook covering the state's modern highways and what there was to see along them. The Rainier-to-Astoria segment still went down Beaver Creek at that point but didn't mention the falls at all. The Portland-to-Rainier segment did mention Little Jack Falls, so it's not clear to me beats why the guide mentions one and not the other.

I don't have a direct link for when Beaver Creek Road was bypassed, but Recreating the HCRH said it happened in 1955, referencing a 2008 book "Road of Difficulties - Building the Lower Columbia River Highway", which is out of print and Amazon doesn't have in stock, unfortunately.

After being bypassed, Beaver Falls largely fell off the radar, or at least it stopped being newsworthy in Portland. I did find one crime story from 1982 where campers near the falls were pursued and terrorized by a gang of drunk teenagers, causing one of the campers to fall off a 40 foot cliff. I couldn't find a followup story indicating whether the perpetrators were ever caught, or if a gang of drunk 50-somethings is out there to this day, lurking in the forest and preying on unwary tourists. Not the sort of story that makes readers want to visit the place, regardless.

And then nothing much in the paper until the article this summer, plus the handful of useful internet results I dredged up while putting this together, and now the post you're currently reading. Now, I'm not going to claim this here is the definitive page about the place, I mean, I've only been there once, for less than half an hour tops, did not interview anyone for this, etc., but I'm fairly sure this is the longest thing anybody's written about it in quite some time, largely because I kept finding interesting tidbits to add, and I don't have a grumpy chain-smoking editor to keep me from wandering off on tangents and yell at me to just finish the damn blog post already. In any case, this one was fun to write, and I hope it was at least mildly interesting to read.