Tuesday, August 25, 2026

Punchbowl Falls, West Fork Hood River

Our next adventure takes us out to Hood River again, and then a surprisingly long drive south through farm country to Punchbowl Falls, a rather short but very picturesque waterfall on the West Fork of the Hood River.

Some of you may be confused already: You've been there before, and you know it's on Eagle Creek, and you have the photos and cliff-jumping scars to prove it, and I must be letting AI write my posts now just going by how wrong I am about everything. You will be, or ought to be, relieved to know that there are multiple vaguely punchbowl-esque waterfalls out there, and you're thinking of the much better-known one, the Punch Bowl Falls on, yes, Eagle Creek. And when I say "Eagle Creek", I mean the one in the Gorge, not the other famous Eagle Creek near Estacada, which has waterfalls of its own but no punchbowls. Anyway, they both kinda-sorta look like overflowing punch bowls if you squint just right, I guess. Also -- and this is very important -- observe that the two names are not quite identical: The one south of Hood River is "Punchbowl", one word, while the Eagle Creek one is "Punch Bowl", two words. And no, I don't know of a reliable way to remember that and not get it backwards, and nobody else does either, as any search of the modern interwebs on either name will demonstrate. On top of all that, the two names sound exactly the same when spoken aloud, so you'll have to say "the Eagle Creek one" or "the Hood River one" if there's a chance listeners will be confused.

It's admittedly an unusual naming convention, but at least it's somewhat extensible: Let's suppose that another heretofore-unknown third kinda-sorta-punchbowl-ish waterfall is discovered, way off in some wild remote corner of the state. The obvious logical next step is to call the newcomer "Pun Chb Owl Falls", three words but still pronounced 'punchbowl', except by tourists and anybody else who doesn't know the drill, kind of like what Portland does with "Couch" and "Glisan". And you can support up to nine unique punchbowls this way, ending with "P U N C H B O W L", as in nine single-letter words in a row, separated by spaces, but still pronounced "punchbowl". So far we actually haven't needed all this extra name flexibility, but you never know. And as a side note, we do also have a Punchbowl Canyon Falls, in the south Coast Range near Florence, and we can reuse the naming convention if any more punchbowl-ish canyons turn up. So there's that.

To further confuse things, I came across a couple of old photos of the falls here via the History Museum of Hood River County, and they have captions calling it "Devil's Punchbowl". That name probably fell out of use here due to the famous Devil's Punch Bowl on the coast, which is a former sea cave and not a waterfall at all. In that last link the state park department spells "Punchbowl" as one word, but the State Land Inventory System has it as two words.

And while we're at it, Martin Falls -- a 342' seasonal waterfall near Grand Coulee Dam -- also sometimes goes by "Devil's Punchbowl". And an old picture postcard at the Hood River museum. The USGS Geographic Names map lists 81 Devils something-or-others just in Oregon, and just counting the officially-official, federally-approved ones. Which is enough to have its own OregonHikers thread. Curry County on the South Coast is home to three separate Devils Backbones, which seems excessive if you ask me. I think my favorite on the list has to be Devils Ball Diamond, located off Highway 31 in Eastern Oregon and looks (to me, anyway) a lot like Hole-in-the-Ground, a maar (a pit formed by an ancient volcanic steam explosion) about 15 miles to the north of there, and a place we visited wayyyy back in 2007.

This whole situation could be a lot worse, just so you know. Back before Disney bought the Star Wars® universe, there was a whole "Expanded Universe" of novels and comic books of widely varying quality that were roughly based on the original films. To the dismay of harcore fans, Disney abruptly declared all of that stuff to be "Legends" and not exactly canonical, mostly to avoid paying various authors (because Hollywood), but also partly to avoid being painted into various dumb plot corners forever. It seems that at one point a nefarious bad guy decided to clone Luke Skywalker, in furtherance of various nefarious plans, using DNA from the hand Luke lost track of in Empire Strikes Back. Obviously the clone needed a name, and so Luuke Skywalker (with two U's) was, er, born. And that naturally led to Luuuke Skywalker, (three U's) and frankly I was never into the books and I have no idea how far they eventually ran with this naming scheme, but for a while I gather you had to count the 'u's pretty religiously just to keep track of who was talking. A bit of friendly advice: Do not even consider naming your children this way, no matter how big of a Star Wars® nerd you are.

Anyway, the falls here are part of a Hood River County Park of quite recent vintage, having opened to the public in 2016, per the Portland Monthly and Thrive Hood River articles and a Wyeast Blog post about the new park.

The only non-recent Oregonian story I could find about this place was a brief mention in a September 1933 fishing report. It seems the river was full of salmon just then and chinook and steelhead could be seen leaping the falls. Note this was a few years before Bonneville Dam went in, so fish back then still had a basically unimpeded path from the ocean to here, and your mileage may vary widely if you go now.

The rickety stairs into the canyon across the river, and the spooky-looking tunnels next to the falls, are there as part of either a fish ladder/hatchery facility, or some sort of small PacifiCorp hydropower facility, or possibly both, or maybe a secret government facility masquerading as one or the other or both. I haven't seen a good explanation of exactly what was here when all of that stuff was built and what it was all for, and I'm certainly not about to try my hand at those stairs to get a better look. That's left as an exercise for the reader, and feel free to have a go at it if you want to. I mean, obviously all the standard disclaimers apply, Legal says to tell you "Don't even think about it", and common sense dictates that it's a terrible idea, and you should realize that instantly without anyone telling you, etc. But let's be honest: Telling people not to be idiots rarely works on the people who need to hear it, namely idiots. Maybe that would work if this was a different planet, and we were a different species, in a different timeline. I think I've said before that the key advantage of humans having language and living in groups is that you can learn important survival facts like what tasty-looking fruits and root vegetables to avoid, and why not to pick up snakes or hug sharks or startle a mule while standing right behind it, and you can learn this stuff for free, at zero cost to yourself, after it happens to some other idiot. But no, some people are only ever going to learn things the old-fashioned way. I just don't want their equally dumb next of kin trying to sue me afterward for failing to talk them out of it.

I say all that because Punch Bowl and Punchbowl Falls are both fairly close to Hood River, a place that likes to think of itself as the world capital of XTREME® sports of all kinds, and frankly it wouldn't surprise me a lot if someone eventually decided to try a parkour run on the stairs here, and might even succeed if they've lived here long enough, and actually it's the clumsy copycats who try to repeat the feat after seeing it on Instagram who will eventually ruin it for everyone. And in any event the internet's full of endless videos of people doing various XTREME® sports at both waterfalls, and here are a few of them, and let's agree they're just here as examples of things to absolutely not do:

  • Two clips of people cliff jumping here, and one over at Eagle Creek The not-very-encylcopedic list at iCliffDive.com (which is a website that exists) gets the two waterfalls confused just like everyone else does, and only talks about the Eagle Creek one but with the Hood River name & location. I frankly don't think any of these places look very safe, but if I had to pick one, yeah, I'm taking the Eagle Creek one.
  • Kayaking over the falls here, and at Eagle Creek. One of these, I forget which, was (and may still be) accompanied by a YouTube ad for a TripAdvisor page titled "Punchbowl Waterfall - All You Need To Know BEFORE You Go", featuring a stock photo of Niagara Falls (the famous New York one, not the Oregon one). Naturally that link goes to their page about the Eagle Creek waterfall.
  • Rafting over the falls here. Content warning on this one: The raft tips over and dumps someone in the water at the base of the falls, and they take ages to pop back up, but they eventually do and they're ok. I haven't found an Eagle Creek equivalent for this one, but I'm fairly sure I've heard of people doing it.
  • For rafting and probably kayaking too, the falls here have one advantage over Eagle Creek in that there's a USGS water monitoring station some distance downstream, after the confluence with the East Fork, and it has close to real time flow numbers in cubic feet per second, so at least you can get an accurate idea of what you're getting into before taking the plunge, so to speak. I'm writing this in late August and the current volume is around 215 ft^3/s, which is low but not the record low for the day, which is just 160. The median value for the day is around 311, and the record high for the day is 1150, which seems like a huge number, but the all-time record goes back to the floods of December 22nd 1964, when a whopping 33200 ft^3/s flowed through here, a full 154x as much water as is there right now.
  • Salmon leaping the falls here. Which is really only an XTREME® sport if you're a salmon.
and they don't seem to have a volume gauge on Eagle Creek, even though

HCRH Milepost 72

Here are a few photos of HCRH Milepost 72, which -- as I mentioned in the previous milepost post -- is cleverly concealed just inside the east entrance to the Mosier Twin Tunnels. This has got to be the most unusual location of any of the mileposts I've seen, and I've seen quite a few of them. Strictly speaking this one is probably not one of the handful of originals that survived from 1916; the tunnel was filled with rocks and concrete and sealed off in the late 1950s, and if I had to guess, chances are the original was lost around that time, and then recreated when they restored this section of road in the late 1990s.

Nearby points of interest include, well, the tunnel it's inside of, for one thing. Which is a whole separate post I probably ought to finish sooner rather than later. Further west, in the gap I don't have photos from yet, apparently there's an HCRH Trail viewpoint right at the Hood River-Wasco county line and at least one seasonal waterfall right next to the old road, though I'm not sure where the latter is located exactly. There's also the Hatfield East trailhead itself, and a parking lot for the trailhead a short distance down the road from there. The parking area looks out over a rather stark, barren lava flow area that serves as a large ODOT rock quarry, and if you visit in the spring you miight be able to see Lelliot Falls (Mosier's second-most-famous waterfall, after Mosier Creek Falls) somewhere across the valley in that general direction. Though I've never come across any actual photos of it, so maybe it doesn't flow very often, or maybe it's just not very impressive in person, I dunno.

Due north of the tunnel (and milepost 72) and skipping over Interstate 84 (which doesn't count as a point of interest, sorry) there's a ~10 acre rocky island in the Columbia River, a short distance offshore, officially known as Eighteenmile Island and unofficially as Chicken Charlie's Island, though the origin of that name is not entirely clear; it was owned by a local eccentric named Charlie Reither from 1915-1963, but apparently he never actually had chickens there. The next owners replaced Chicken Charlie's shack with a groovy modern house in 1969. It sold in December 2025 for $1.675M after being on the market for several years; unfortunately the Zillow page for the house (and island) only has aerial photos of the place, because who wouldn't be curious about what it's like inside? The Zillow page also gives the legal address as simply "18 Mile Is., Mosier, OR 97040". Which is kind of neat, though it probably breaks a lot of online shopping sites that assume the 18 is an address on a street named "Mile Island", which is probably some kind of traffic island and not the real deal, and all things considered it's probably simpler to just get a P.O. Box and use that instead. For more info on the island, check out these two pages at the Hood River History Museum plus one page from the local public utility district (for whatever reason).

Sunday, August 23, 2026

Wailua Falls, Maui

Here are a few photos of Maui's Wailua Falls, along the Hana Highway at the far eastern end of the island, just past milepost 45. This seems to be one of the more popular waterfalls along the highway, despite being out toward the far end of the road, past the town of Hana itself; it's taller than average, somewhere between 80 and 95 feet high, depending on who you ask, plus there's an actual parking lot here, instead of just parking along the shoulder and hoping positive vibes and a general spirit of aloha will keep you from getting run over. I mean, that's usually enough, but there's always a chance you'll encounter that one guy from some uptight East Coast state who's too busy on his phone screaming at his stockbroker to notice people in the road, and his expensive lawyers will try to blame the state for calling this little 1.1 lane road a state highway, leading him to drive as if it was a proper 4 to 8 lane highway like the ones back home, therefore it's not actually his fault. Or something like that, I'm not a lawyer. But I digress.

This is probably something nobody besides me worries about, but I was curious who actually owns the land around the falls here. Maui County's GIS map says the state government owns it, but doesn't specify which agency. The detailed property record for it also just says "State of Hawaii". It's not a state park, and is also not part of the state forest reserve system, but beyond that I'm not really sure, and I don't recall there being any signs around the falls that would clear this up either, and it's all weirdly kind of vague, but maybe it's not a problem in practice, I dunno.

For actual useful info about the falls, you might try its World of Waterfalls page, or this Medium post about a recent visit, or a Pride of Maui guide to waterfalls around the island.

Fern Hill Forest

Next up, here are a few photos from Metro's super-obscure Fern Hill Forest Natural Area, in rural Washington County, Oregon, a few miles south of Forest Grove. It's more or less across the street from the Penstemon Prairie Natural Area we visited a while back, and not far from the shiny new Chehalem Ridge Nature Park. (Despite the very similar names this is not the same place as the nearby Fernhill Wetlands, Forest Grove's wastewater treatment complex slash nature area, which is a very popular birdwatching spot and allegedly much less stinky than you might expect, though birders always say that.)

I parked right about here, on the wide shoulder off SW Fern Hill Road, and wandered into the park for a while. The place doesn't seem to have any trails of any significance; part of the whole idea of Metro natural areas is that they don't add infrastructure to places after buying them, beyond a couple of tiny signs confirming they own the place. Metro does like to buy chunks of private timberland after they've been replanted (and the owner decides they don't want to wait another 30 years to make their money back), so that's usually how a natural area gets airquote-trails, but that doesn't seem to have happened here. Or at least I didn't see any, and I don't see anything that looks like an old road or hidden trail on the state LIDAR map, and while I was looking I quickly noticed there were quite a few stinging nettles around here. So it wasn't long before I shrugged and headed off to the next adventure.

There isn't a whole lot out there on the interwebs that I can tell you about the place either. Here's what I've got:

  • The only relevant news item I've encountered is a brief mention in a 2014 story about a Metro Council visit to Forest Grove. The article just notes that the place exists and doesn't elaborate.
  • Metro's 2020 Chehalem Ridge Master Plan mentions Fern Hill briefly:
    Fern Hill Forest is adjacent to Penstemon Prairie to the southeast, and it protects a steep forested hillside and a key potential habitat connection between Chehalem and the complex of protected wetlands along the Tualatin River.

    Which is a long way of saying it's between two areas they're interested in protecting, and keeping it natural here might help with that. The creeks that flow through here do seem to end up over on the Penstemon Prairie side of the street, so I would imagine that's the main point of this place.
  • A 2025 pdf from a regional trails planning effort includes Fern Hill Forest in a table of westside Metro natural areas, as part of a larger section on improving maps of the region. It does tell us the natural area comes to 262 acres but has no further useful info about it, not even the year it was established, and the comment column of the table just says "No info available", and indicates it wasn't on the old map they were updating, and also wouldn't be on the updated new map, unlike most of the other natural areas nearby.
  • Metro's records site has an entry for a "Fern Hill Forest Natural Area Site Conservation Plan", indicating there's a plan for the place, but the actual document isn't online, and I haven't gone to the trouble of doing a public records request. The next few items indicate there's more to the plan than just benignly neglecting the place.
  • A March 2026 Metro budget doc for fiscal year 2025-26 lists a couple of Fern Hill Forest budget items, both of them carried over from previous years: $271k for "LR147 Fern Hill Forest Stream & Savana Restoration", and $270k for "LR155 Fern Hill Forest Stream Restoration".
  • A ConstructConnect page for a project titled "Fern Hill Forest Stream Restoration - LR155 - Oregon Metro" that was up for competitive bids in early 2025 and underway as of October. (The photos you see here were from before that, because of my chronic inability to get posts researched and written in anything like a timely manner). The page says of the project "A detailed Scope has not yet been determined. As of May 5, 2025, this project is included in the county's 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)".
  • A recent Oregonian data project indicated Metro does use glyphosphate herbicides here, using 1.2 gallons in 2022, the most recent year they had records for. That's probably for taking out invasive plants, if I had to guess.
  • And most frustratingly, I came across a few search breadcrumbs indicating there's a video somewhere on Facebook (ugh) involving a Metro restoration expert encountering a baby porcupine here. But I can't find it. I went so far as to actually log in over there and try to search that way, but FB search has always been useless and now is no exception. Which is really annoying, because baby porcupines are adorable, and I can't imagine anyone would rather watch bottom-feeding AI slop than real baby porcupines, but that's how the algorithm's coded, so that's what FB is going to show you, instead of the thing you actually searched for. Yuck.

Saturday, July 25, 2026

HCRH Milepost 69

Next up we've got another installment in our weird little project visiting Historic Columbia River Highway mileposts. Which started out as just visiting the old stone milestones along Portland's Stark St., and sort of got out of control over time. But I figured that I at least had a pretty good handle on the scope of the new project: One stretch of mileposts numbered 17 thru 36, in the Gorge waterfall corridor, then a couple of odd outliers: A maybe-unofficial Milepost 43 on the east side of Cascade Locks, and a solitary Milepost 68 just east of Hood River, which we just visited. East of number 68 is a four-mile stretch of old highway reserved for bikes and pedestrians and no (or almost no) motor vehicles, and I was pretty sure there weren't any mileposts along that stretch of road. ODOT's milepost GIS map didn't show any, and I hadn't seen any along other car-free stretches of the highway further west.

But then I noticed a photo of Milepost 69 on a Recreating the HCRH page about this stretch of the road and figured I'd stop by on my way to the Mosier Twin Tunnels, around the other end of the car-free segment. Only to find out there's also a Milepost 72, literally inside one of the Twin Tunnels, a bit before the driveable segment of road picks back up. Which kind of suggests numbers 70 and 71 also exist, though I didn't feel like doing a nine mile out-and-back hike that day and I don't have photos of them, if they exist. I will just have to come back with a better plan next time, I guess.

There's not all that much to see along this mile-or-so of the road, unfortunately. The page I linked to above says there's an abandoned car from the 1930s or 1940s off in the forest somewhere, and an old non-working drinking fountain, but I didn't notice any of those curiosities at the time and have no photos of them.

In case you're wondering, the old highway is mostly on US Forest Service land for this stretch of the old road, interspersed with bits of Warm Springs tribal land here and there. But that wasn't always the case; the Hood River County survey office has a 1975 survey map showing that at least some of the land around here was county forest land at that point, which might explain why none of the trees look very old. As in, the original trees were probably all cut down sometime in the 70s and made into groovy wood paneling for your rumpus room, or pulped and turned into disco album covers. And before that, way back when the old highway was the only highway, the present-day Forest Service parts belonged to the state as part of the long-defunct Hood River-Mosier Forest Wayside (vintage map here), one of those long and skinny roadside state parks that are meant to be enjoyed from a moving vehicle from that era, like this:

20260711_150504

Apparently Hood River's big museum of vintage stuff puts one of these events together every summer -- I had no idea this event was happening until I showed up and saw the sign -- and I gather there are other car clubs that organize similar events here from time to time. I don't know how strict they are about only allowing vintage cars to do this, but it's a narrow road with narrow and low tunnels, and vehicles are sharing the road with bikes and pedestrians who don't expect vehicles, and allowing modern Canyoneros and Cybertrucks and whatnot to drive around here would probably result in the SUV version of that one ship that got stuck in the Suez Canal back during the pandemic.

Just as I was leaving the trailhead parking lot, a couple of maintenance guys were doing weed whacker and leaf blower stuff near the gate, which was still open after the convoy shown above went through it. I must have looked at it for a fraction of a second too long, because one of the guys hurried over and closed the gate to make sure I couldn't drive through and go for a forbidden joyride on the old road. I actually wasn't thinking that, for the record. I think I probably could have made it through the gate before he closed it, if I had really wanted to, but that would be an exceptionally dumb idea: At the east end of this stretch of highway is another locked gate, so you'd have to turn around at some point, and in the meantime they can just lock the gate on this end once you're gone through, and now you're trapped, and Officer Friendly can just sit around gobbling donuts and collecting overtime while you drive back and forth looking for a secret back way out of this jam and eventually give up.

I mean, you probably could get a few semi-precious photos of the distant mileposts 70 and 71 before the long arm of the law has its way with you, but it's probably not worth the arrest record. On the other hand, they'd probably just fine you (*note: not a legally binding promise), and the fine is probably less than it would cost to buy, restore, and then maintain the sort of car you could drive here legally now and then, so crime might actually pay in this one specific case (*note: also not a legally binding promise). Or you could just go mainstream and get a bike like some kind of normie and use the trail the way The Man and The Powers That Be intended, which is what everyone else you'll encounter here is doing. That might cost less than the hypothetical fine would be, or it might cost more, mostly depending on how persuasive the bike salesman is, and a bit on whether you're willing to shell out for an all-new spandex outfit every time your favorite UCI pro team changes sponsors.

Anyway, I think we've established that the gate blocking this stretch of road makes it mildly inconvenient to track down the two mileposts in the middle, but it does have a few advantages. For one thing, we all know the subject of the post you're reading right now would be stolen constantly if randos could just drive right up to it, because, well...

I think everybody misremembers this scene; Bill and Ted just say "whoa" in response, and replying with "nice" is a sorta-recent internet thing. Or at least that's what the Know Your Meme page says. I didn't even have the movie or actor(s) right. For some reason I was thinking this bit came from Spicoli in Fast Times at Ridgemont High (1982), so what do I know.

People stealing Milepost 69 seems like a minor nuisance, and it is, but think of all the other downstream problems that just don't happen because stealing it is too hard. First, all college campuses with real fraternities are several hours' drive from here, and any would-be thieves would naturally be driving blackout drunk the whole way, both directions, so the gate prevents that, at least assuming word gets out that there's a gate. Then, if they made it as far as Milestone 69 without crashing, a group of bros drunkenly trying to break it off at the base are likely to take some injuries in the process, seeing as it's a fairly large hunk of reinforced concrete, so the gate prevents these theft-related injuries too. As well as any future injuries and property damage the milepost would otherwise cause at subsequent frat parties, or while being endlessly stolen and stolen back and re-stolen all the way down fraternity row and back. Eventually it would end up forgotten in someone's garage, and it will be embarrassing for everyone when their kids find it, and there might be further hypothetical injuries while quickly hauling it to the dump or the nearest Goodwill.

And suppose that one of the original thieves, now a successful real estate developer, often blames his middle-aged back problems on that fateful heist, and after a few drinks likes to refer to it as "an old 69 injury". He overuses this joke because it's the only halfway-clever joke he's ever thought of. Lately, though, he's noticed it doesn't get the same laughs it did back in the 90s, especially in professional settings, but he has no idea why. Sooner or later he'll be perma-cancelled over it after using it in front of the wrong audience and video of the event hits social media.

So by putting the gate and trailhead a bit past Milepost 68 and not another mile down the road, the state prevents an entire chain of cringey future events. Although the sort of person who would get into this hypothetical mess in the first place will probably just get himself perma-cancelled over something else equally cringey instead.

Saturday, July 04, 2026

HCRH Milepost 68

Next up we're back on the Columbia River Highway milepost project again, which we left back at Milepost 36 at the Ainsworth intersection off I-84. Or at the unusual Milepost 43 on the east side of Cascade Locks, if you think it counts. This time around we've skipped ahead to Milepost 68, which is located just east of Hood River, near the end of the dead-end (for cars) segment of the old highway and one mile east of the Hood River Loops, where Milepost 67 is supposed to be and currently isn't. I would like to tell you that the rest of the mile east of the Loops is an overlooked scenic treasure, and you shouldn't miss it even though it's not on the way to anywhere at all. But it really isn't, and from the loops to the gate on the road is basically just generic Gorge forest scenery, with no waterfalls or scenic viewpoints or other attractions. I mean, obviously besides the milepost here. Then, shortly after Milepost 68 you get to the west end of another bike/pedestrian-only segment of the old highway, officially known as the "Mark O. Hatfield West Trailhead", named after one of the state's longest-serving 20th century US senators. This car-free stretch continues for another four miles, ending at the other Hatfield trailhead just east of Mosier.

Vintage ODOT maps of the old highway (including maps 3B-15-8 (December 1922), and 6C-15-7 (which is not currently available online)) show another long-vanished state park here, the "Hood River-Mosier Forest Wayside", which began a short distance past milepost 68 and continued east past milepost 70. Map says it was an "Official Park", indicating it was given a high priority for maintenance and visitor facilities and whatnot, but I think it was always just intended to be a stretch of protected scenery.

The obscure park got a brief mention in State Parks of the Columbia Gorge (1946, p.47-49), a Highway Commission publication about the various and sundry state-owned or managed places between Troutdale and The Dalles. It travels up the Gorge, west to east, and for each state park there's a description by W.A. Langille, state park historian, followed by recommendations by Samuel H. Boardman, longtime state park superintendent.

The Hood River-Mosier Forest Wayside begins at Mile Post 68.22, a mile or so east of Hood River, and ends at Mile Post 70.48, a little over two miles of highway distance. The tracts are described last being in Sections 31, 32, and 33, Township 7 North of Range 11 East, W.M., all in Hood River County, containing 101.50 acres, more or less. These tracts are designated in the deeds as being "Indian Deed Inherited Lands", conveyed to the State of Oregon by noncompetent "Cascade" Indians who were of Hood River origin. Their names and the respective acreages are: Katie Coon, heir of Charles Coon and Jack Coon, 36.83 acres; Thomas Jim, a single man, 28.60 acres; Martha Aleck, widow of Joe Aleck, 15.07 acres; William Johnson and Isabel Johnson, his wife, Frank Johnson and Celia Johnson, his wife and Edward Johnson and Esther Johnson, his wife, 21.00 acres. All were respected citizens of this community. In his younger days Jack Coon was a noted bear hunter. For several years Joe Aleck, Martha's husband, carried the White Salmon mail and ferried passengers across the Columbia in an open, not too seaworthy skiff. He had three sons all of whom met death in river accidents. At the time of her death in 1939, Martha Aleck was the oldest member of the Hood River Indians, erroneously reputed to be a hundred years old. She was a small child, possibly two years of age, at the time of the Indian troubles at the Cascades in 1856. Her father was warned by a friendly Klickitat Indian that the Yakimas planned to attack the settlement the next day. To avoid being involved in the conflict he put Martha, her mother, and their meager possessions into his canoe and left for Hood River at midnight before the trouble started. This would fix Martha's age at eighty five, more or less, when she died.

The east end of this wayside forest is approximately a half mile from the Hood River-Wasco County line, and marks what is practically the east limit of the western Oregon Douglas fir forest area along the Columbia River Highway. Within the length of the wayside forest there are two small, privately owned, triangular tracts that corner on the highway right of way and interrupt its state owned continuity. Although the acreage is not great, their sylvan value is high, especially in this locality, which punctuates the waning edge of the fir forest that borders the highway on its march from the ocean to the treeless region beyond.

The only improvements in this wayside were fire breaks fire hazard reduction and a lineal survey, by CCC forces in 1934.
Boardman's recommendations were quite simple, as they tended to be for scenic corridor-type parks:
The waysides should always be kept in their natural state. Connecting forties should be acquired.

The bit explaining how the state got the land is not great, to put it mildly. At one point federal policy was to divide reservations up into individual allotments, as a way to sort of pressure people to adopt western ways and become respectable yeoman farmers just like their caucasian neighbors. And if they didn't do that to your satisfaction, on your preferred timetable, it was apparently rather easy to have them declared "incompetent", which caused their land to be forfeited to the state or to local governments, and then often sold off to the highest bidder. And this is how various reservations were progressively whittled away to nothing, all the while blaming the victims for somehow lacking personal responsibility. The history blurb does not elaborate on exactly when various people were kicked off of their land, whether it was done specifically for the highway and the state park or if it had happened years earlier.

The state doesn't own the land now. When present-day Interstate 84 opened along the river around 1953-54, the state abandoned this stretch of the state highway and let Hood River and Wasco counties take over their parts of the road, and the rules at the time said the land couldn't be a state park anymore if it no longer bordered a state highway, so they handed it off to the US Forest Service, which still owns the area. And it's safe to say that the current administration (as of 2026) absolutely will not entertain the notion of returning any land back to heirs, or tribes, or anyone, no matter how egregiously they were swindled out of it decades ago.

Sunday, June 14, 2026

Barlow Monument, Government Camp

Next up we're visiting the little mountain town of Government Camp, OR, about 56 miles SE of Portland on US 26, and due south of Mount Hood. We aren't here to ski, or snowshoe, or attend any chic apres-ski disco parties (which as far as I know don't exist here anyway), or even sit around eating fondue and making fun of people trying to drive in the snow. We also aren't here for any extreme summer sports. We aren't even here for the hiking this time, though that's usually a good guess. No, this time it's something nerdy, unfashionable, and very small.

We're checking out a little landscaped triangle at the corner of E. Olive St., Little Trail, and Government Camp Loop (the main street through town, and the original route of US26 through here). We're looking at the one bit with a few rose bushes around a large boulder the size of a small boulder bearing a pair of old brass plaques. One is a monument to Samuel Kimbrough Barlow, namesake of the Barlow Road. The Barlow Road was the notorious local toll-road segment of the Oregon Trail, where you paid a premium to avoid drowning in the rapids at Cascade Locks, only for your rugged pioneer family to die of dysentery on their way through the mountains.

The second plaque honors his wife, Susannah Lee Barlow, a recognized Daughter of the American Revolution. The monument location was apparently at a point where the new Mt. Hood Highway (circa 1925) intersected Barlow's old road. And more importantly, it was a point where the new highway angled out of the Government Camp street grid and cut through some platted lots, and that left a 25 square foot scrap of land here, outside the highway right-of-way but far too small to do much of anything with except put up a historical marker.


Origins

The monument was proposed in June 1921 and dedicated in July 1925, in conjunction with the official grand opening of the shiny new Mt. Hood Loop Highway. A followup item in August 1925 noted that the attendees included one F.A. Gaines, presently of Jackson, MS, who had last traveled the Barlow Road as a small child in 1845.

(Elderly pioneers retracing their steps was a popular activity around this time, most famously by Ezra Meeker, who arrived by oxcart in 1852 and then retraced his steps a few times to publicize various causes: By oxcart again in 1906, for historic preservation of the old Oregon Trail; by automobile in 1916, to promote good roads; and by airplane in 1925 because he just sort of wanted to.)

Ordinarily a boulder with a couple of brass history plaques on it would be a minor local curiosity, at best. Plaques on boulders do give off an air of permanence, but they're not a great way to teach history, and getting people to actually read your monumental boulder is a whole other issue. The reason we're talking about it today is that someone had the notion of donating the marker to the state and making it an exceptionally tiny state park. The state initially declined the gift in October 1925, on the grounds that 25 square feet was too small to beautify properly. But they eventually warmed up to the idea; state parks were a sort of side hobby of the state highway department back in those days, so adopting a monument to an early builder of roads (and largely-unsuccessful collector of tolls on said roads) was hard to resist, and so the place was duly surveyed and added to the system. A prime example of this historical retcon is a 1946 historical note that calls Barlow a "pioneer roadbuilder", adopting him as a forefather of the present-day state highway department.

Per the story related there, Barlow claimed he figured out where to put the road by looking for a dip on the horizon, a place where the hills weren't quite as tall. As if he was imitating fellow Kentuckian Daniel Boone finding the Cumberland Gap. Although Appalachian geology is completely different than ours, and a key part of the Cumberland Gap turned out to be a gigantic meteor crater, and we don't have one of those here, as far as anybody knows. Or at least we don't have one yet. What probably actually happened here is the same as what happened in thousands of other places: White guy stumbles across a path used by local tribes for thousands of years. Names it after himself and tells everyone he discovered it, and they agree to believe him, and history is written down accordingly.

On coming across this route, Barlow also saw dollar signs, and somehow enlisted much of his wagon train to help out with a few months of unplanned physical labor building a rudimentary road here, thiiis close to the end of their long journey, and we may never know exactly how voluntary this volunteer work actually was. The Barlows finally arrived in Oregon City on Christmas Day, which is very late in the year to be rolling through the snowy mountains in a covered wagon. The history note doesn't say this, but it sounds to me like they may have narrowly avoided a Donner Party scenario. Barlow quickly talked the Provisional Government into letting him set up a tollbooth. The historical note doesn't explore whether the other wagon train members saw a cent of the proceeds after all the trail work they did, and in any case the Barlow Road tolls were easily evaded by the simple measure of detouring your wagon around the spot where the toll gate was located.

Once the little park was established, it duly appeared on official state highway maps like any other state park would, like map number 5C-10-18 titled "Property Acquired for Right-of-Way in Townsite of Pompeii", dated November 1927, which shows it as a tiny flyspeck, but it does label it and tells you to consult map 1R-1-795 for a closer look. To be honest I'm mostly linking to those because old hand-drawn, hand-lettered ODOT maps just look cool. Also, regarding the "Pompeii" bit: That's what the town's founder wanted to call the place, but the name was unpopular and didn't stick. Maybe locals worried the fate of the original Pompeii might scare away potential homebuyers. Or maybe they were aware of the original Pompeii's pre-volcano reputation as an epicenter of Roman debauchery, even by the empire's usual standards, and figured that might attract the wrong element. Still, if you were thinking of moving to Government Camp and starting a pizza place or a gelato shop or maybe a retro-themed Southern Italian restaurant, but you're stuck on what to call the place, working "Pompeii" into the name seems appropriate.

A few period photos of the monument in its early days can be found online, like a 1920s photo of the new monument at the Hood River History Museum, and another via the Southern Oregon Historical Society in Medford. The local history museum in Government Camp is right across the street from the little monument so they may know something about it too, but their website doesn't mention it and you'd probably have to ask someone in person.


World Champion!

The monument and its tiny park had been around for about a decade when it occurred to a few people that it really was exceedingly small and as such it might even be a record-holder of some sort. In April 1936, the Oregon Journal editorial page just wanted to point out that some unnamed statewide public figure out there was going around claiming that Salem's miniscule Waldo Park was the world's smallest park, at 10 feet by 15 feet, and the paper let it be known this was not actually true, and the Salem park was a whopping six times the size of the true champion up in Government Camp. (It's actually 9.6 times as big, per Marion County property records, which give an official size of 240 square feet). And if this whole "world's smallest park" business sounds awfully familiar -- even though you've never heard of the Barlow Monument before -- just hang on; we're getting to that.

As a side note, Waldo Park is home to a single giant sequoia tree that was planted back in 1872. Assuming the tree stays healthy and continues growing at an ordinary sequoia growth rate, and lives to equal the General Grant Tree in Kings Canyon National Park maybe 1500 years from now, it will have grown larger than the present-day park. But we'll let the worrywarts of the year 3535 AD or thereabouts figure out that one.

June 1936: The Journal reprinted a similar Bend Bulletin editorial, which pinned the inaccurate claim on former State Forester Lynn F. Cronemiller (boo! hiss!). The article asked readers if they knew of other contenders around the world, but I didn't see any follow-up articles naming any, so it's possible nobody else on earth saw this as a thing worth doing.

Brief mentions of the park appeared in May 1937 and June 1938 articles on some of the gems of the state park system. Actually now that I look at the two, the 1938 piece looks like a cut-down version of the previous year's story. The 25-square-foot factoid survived the chopping block, though, and appears in both.

A few events were held at, or rather near the monument 1940-41 as the centennial of the old road approached. For example, a June 1940 dedication of a plaque on a flagpole that had been installed here the year before, with a program of general patriotic remarks and music accompaniment. A photo of the event appeared a few days later on the Journal's photo page, featuring dignitaries from the Sons and Daughters of Oregon Pioneers and the local American Legion post. Directly below this are a couple of photos of the new Oregon Humane Society shelter on Columbia Boulevard, including a cat enclosure with what looks like a really nice climbing structure, even by today's standards. The other photo shows a row of individual enclosures for dogs, each with its own indoor and outdoor section, and mentions one adoptable dog named "Shorty" who was said to be a police dog - dachshund mix. But because 1940 was a dark and primitive time, long before the Internet, the paper did not think to show us a close-up photo of this peculiar-sounding creature.

In May 1941 there was a sort of memorial service and wreath laying at the Pioneer Woman's Grave monument further east along US 26. The writer of the small blurb seemingly got it confused with the monument in Government Camp, calling it the Barlow Monument and claiming she had been a member of the original Barlow party in 1845. I can't find any other sources claiming that, and it probably isn't true. An old USFS sign near the gravesite claimed she died in 1845, but a later DAR plaque at the site (seen in this WyEast Blog post) just gives a date range of "184?", and a later Forest Service sign (also shown in that post) hedges its bets even further and just says "18-?", and all we really know is that it dates to sometime before 1924 when the site was rediscovered by Mt. Hood Highway construction workers. But I digress.

There were undoubtedly additional Oregon Trail Centennial festivities being planned for the next few years, but then World War II came along and distracted everyone, and we don't hear about the Barlow Monument again until July 1950, when the Oregonian finally took notice of it for the first time. The usual 25-square-foot statistic appeared in a July 1950 tribute to Samuel H. Boardman, who had retired the previous week after 21 years as state park superintendent. This article was also the last time I saw it mentioned in print as the smallest state park, which might not be a complete coincidence; I've seen enough organizational politics to know what happens to a little pet project after their champion inside the org departs for whatever reason. And the state had already been deemphasizing it in recent years; it was left off of the 1950 official map of the park system, and not included in the 1946 state park guidebook, and somewhere around that time is when US 26 was rerouted to not run right through downtown Government Camp (such as it is) and straightened into its present-day not-quite-a-freeway form, which reduced the odds of visitors randomly stumbling across the tiny park on their way to somewhere else.


A New Challenger Approaches

Going by all of that, it seem the Barlow Monument's star had already waned quite a bit by February 1954, when an Oregon Journal article covered the quote-unquote "official dedication" of Portland's now-famous Mill Ends Park, though the tongue-in-cheek article insisted the park had already been known by that name for "lo, these many years". Apparently there had been some sort of name contest anyway, and Mill Ends narrowly beat out "Portland Envoy Park", named after the variety of rose planted there. I can't seem to find any info on the net about that particular rose variety, and so Google's dumbass search AI insists it does not exist, and scoffs at you for even asking such a ridiculous question.

So yes, the same newspaper that dreamed up Mill Ends Park was previously involved in promoting the Barlow Monument as possibly the world's smallest, and that has got to be how they arrived at the idea.

From that point forward, Mill Ends Park featured regularly in Dick Fagan's regular column. A May 1955 column indignantly notes that some national magazine had once again proclaimed Waldo Park as the very smallest, and points out that it was a whopping 200 times the size of Mill Ends Park. The present-day Mill Ends Park comes to just 452 square inches, or about 3.14 square feet, so it's also roughly 1/8 the size of the previous maybe-champion up in Government Camp.

A 1955 ODOT map of Highway 26 thru the Government Camp area still shows the mini-taxlot but doesn't bother labeling it like earlier maps had done.

The old Barlow Monument got one more brief mention in an October 1965 tour route article, which just says "Just before entering town you’ll pass the BARLOW MONUMENT, which honors the founder of the trail your route now more or less follows." and doesn't say anything about it being a tiny state park.

So what happened? I think the public sort of lost any interest it ever had in seeking out boulders with brass plaques on them. Which, frankly, was never a great way to teach history, let's be honest here. And the "world's smallest" claim is less compelling if you have to include the "smallest *state* park" asterisks. So as far as I can tell, I think everyone just sort of forgot about the place and it slipped away like spare change falling under the sofa cushions.

For whatever it's worth, there's also a smallest unit of the National Park System: Thaddeus Kosciuszko National Memorial (0.02 acres / 871.2 square feet) is a historic house in Philadelphia where the Revolutionary War hero lived for a few months in 1797 after leading a failed uprising against the partition of his native Poland. The site was added to the National Park system in 1972, partly as a leadup to the 1976 Bicentennial and partly to troll the Soviets, who had once again swiped territory from Poland at the end of WWII.

Other interesting semi-random search results (all of them larger than either Mill Ends or the Barlow Monument) include Septuagesimo UNO, the smallest park in New York City; Park No. 474, the smallest in Chicago; and Prince's Park in Burntwood, Staffordshire, the smallest in the UK. Morton Park in Vancouver BC just might be the smallest park full of creepy laughing statues, and let me suggest that we not challenge them for that particular title.


Today

The present-day park, or ex-park, has a couple of rose bushes around the monument itself, and it looks like someone comes by regularly to fuss over them, but so far I haven't figured out who's responsible for the place these days. A current Clackamas County survey map indicates it's not an official tax lot anymore (if it ever was one), so we can't go by ownership records. Ownership of the adjacent streets is mixed: ODOT still owns Government Camp Loop (the main drag thru Government Camp, and part of the old Mt. Hood Highway) as a "frontage road" for US 26, while side streets belong to the county since there's no such thing as a City of Government Camp. The county has tried to tempt the locals into at least becoming a "village" or a "hamlet", two different flavors of lightweight local sorta-government, but so far they haven't taken the bait for that either.

(Note that "Oregon Trail Hut" next door to the monument is not part of the park, and I don't know who (if anyone) takes care of it, either. It's also not old; it was built by high school students in 1992, which I maintain was not that long ago, at least not in geological terms.)

Anyway, just going by inertia we should probably assume the state still owns it. And I haven't seen any records saying the old state park was ever officially abolished; they just sort of stopped talking about the place after a while. And if it still existed on paper, somewhere in an old file cabinet, ORS 390.111 might apply. That's the 1989 law splitting the department off from ODOT. The law says the new department "has complete jurisdiction and authority over all state parks, waysides and scenic, historic or state recreation areas, recreational grounds or places acquired by the state for scenic, historic, natural, cultural or recreational purposes except as otherwise provided by law". (This transfer did not include things like highway rest areas and roadside historical markers, which are managed by yet another state agency, the Oregon Travel Information Council. Their map of historical markers doesn't include this so they don't seem to have claimed it.)

So, long story short, it's possible this little spot is still technically a state park, albeit one that nobody at any state agency is really aware of anymore. And if it is, it just might still be the very smallest state park. As one data point, here's someone's 2011 blog post I came across that tried to identify the smallest state park in each state, and all of the ones listed are quite a bit larger than 25 square feet.

Another complication to all this is that Mill Ends Park, like the Barlow Monument, is just part of road right-of-way, and Naito Parkway / Front Avenue is technically the route of OR 99W -- a state highway -- through downtown Portland, though it's only state maintained south of Market St., a few blocks south of Mill Ends, but that was not always the case, and I guess what I'm getting at here is that we're within spitting distance of being able to claim Mill Ends may have technically been a state park for a while, though the state may have been completely unaware of this fact, or near-fact, or whatever.

And for the pedants out there who insist it can't be a park unless it includes at least one taxlot (you know who you are) -- which Mill Ends doesn't, and the Barlow Monument may have done once but doesn't now -- the smallest one might be the Vernon Ross Veterans Memorial, located on NE Sandy in Portland's Hollywood District, and the traditional centerpiece of Portland Veterans Day commemorations. At 48 square feet it's almost twice the size of the Barlow Monument, but five of them would fit inside Waldo Park. The flagpole is nowhere near as tall as the tree in Waldo Park, so a "max width to max height ratio" category might be a closer contest, though at that point we're just inventing goofy categories so Salem can finally win at something for once.


OK, Now What?

So it's possible we had a series of local champions, each smaller than the previous one: Waldo Park, then the Barlow Monument, and then Mill Ends (452 in^2), and in 2022 the city of Talent, OR unveiled a park 78 square inches smaller (374 in^2), and a town in Japan unveiled a slightly smaller one (372 in^2) at the end of 2024.

An arms race of incrementally shrinking smallest parks sounds really tedious, and ultimately the way to get the crown back for good will involve enlisting Intel to fabricate the tiniest sub-microscopic circle they can manage with their swanky new deep ultraviolet lithography machines; mount it somewhere outside in something theft-proof, maybe by attaching it to a large boulder, and proclaim that as the new smallest park.

Even that might not be enough, though; back in 1989, material scientists at IBM managed to create a company logo with 35 individual xenon atoms. A square of four xenon atoms would be smaller than that, though I bet a molecule with bonds between the atoms would be a lot smaller than that. And for that matter you could take a single atom and say that just the nucleus is your city park, and use hydrogen instead of xenon for the smallest nucleus so that your park is just a single proton. And that might be the end of the line, since I remember reading that all protons are believed to be the exactly same size, and you can't exactly pull individual quarks out of your proton and do anything with them, because quantum chromodynamics, and even if you could, they're probably all the same exact size too. And if it's all ultimately going to end in a tie anyway, we might as well shrink Mill Ends (and the one down in Talent) to match the one in Japan, but not go any smaller than that, and call it a three-way tie and stop there.

Saturday, May 30, 2026

Hood River Loops

Next up we're taking a look at the Hood River Loops, a fun section of the old Columbia River Highway on the eastern edge of Hood River, beginning at the intersection with OR 35. Like the Crown Point Loops[1] (which we visited in the HCRH Milepost 25 post a while back), this is a spot where the old highway climbed a hill by way of multiple switchbacks, in order to limit the slope to something the average car of 1916 could handle.

To give you some idea what that means, the best-selling car that year -- and for most years between 1908 and 1927 -- was the Ford Model T, which came with a 4 cylinder engine producing 20 horsepower and had a top speed of around 42 mph. For context, 20 horsepower is about the same as a present-day riding lawnmower (which is much lighter than a Model T), or about four professional-grade leafblowers. The fastest and most powerful car on the US market in 1916 seems to have been the Packard Twin Six, which had a 464 cubic inch V12(!) engine, but even that only put out a measly 88 horsepower, although that was partly due to the crappy low octane gas of the era.

As with the other multi-switchback sections on the highway, it quickly became apparent that allowing any sort of development at this spot would be a bad idea, potentially turning these ordinary hairpin corners into blind hairpin corners, maybe with a few zero-visibility driveways here and there to make it extra spicy. To prevent this, and probably to preserve views from the top, the state bought the land around the loops in June 1922 and declared the place to be a new state park[2]. You can see this on vintage Highway Commission survey maps from around that time, which I have to link to just because they look cool: The one for the park itself (drawing no. 1R-1-695) is titled "Hood River Loops acquired to protect slopes". Map 3B-15-8 zooms out and covers the whole stretch of the old pre-Interstate-84 route between Hood River and Mosier, and map 1R-1-1167 covers more of the Highway 35 part of the intersection.

The obscure little park got a brief mention in State Parks of the Columbia Gorge (1946, p.45-46), a Highway Commission publication about the various and sundry state-owned or managed places between Troutdale and The Dalles. It travels up the Gorge, west to east, and for each state park there's a description by W.A. Langille, state park historian, followed by recommendations by Samuel H. Boardman, longtime state park superintendent. Langille's blurb about the Hood River Loops is on page 45:

The Hood River Loops Development Area, is made up of small wayside units situated at the junction of the Columbia River Highway and the Mount Hood Highway, and bordering the loops of the rising main highway, just east of Hood River. The junction tract is described as being Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, of Reynolds addition to Hood River, containing 2.77 ecres, a gift to the State of Oregon by the county of Hood River, the deed date February 4, 1931. The tracts bordering the loops, aggregating 4.20 acres were purchased in three parcels, described as being in Section 31, Township 3 North of Range ll gast, W.M., Hood River County, Oregon. The deed dates being May 22, June 13 and September 12, 1922.

The lots at the junction of the highways were acquired for extra right of way and the loop tracts were obtained to prevent encroachments upon the banks of the ascending loops, where there were usable gravel deposits. No park improvements of any kind have been made up to this time.

On the next page, Boardman's one and only recommendation was "They should be left in their natural state." And sure enough, a pre-1937 vintage aerial photo at the Hood River History Museum, and HistoricAerials photos from 1947 and 1973 all show the place looking essentially the same as it does now.

In fact this is still the plan today. ODOT's current master plan for the old highway briefly mentions the Loops on page 44, saying "This section begins with the Hood River Loops, twisting and turning swiftly up the hillside", with a small aerial photo showing what they mean by that, but (just like 1946) they don't have any specific plans for the Loops beyond maintaining the area as-is. But at least nobody's going to build a fugly McMansion right here.

To understand why the state did all this, it may help to remember that Oregon state parks began as a sort of side project of the state highway agency (in its various guises over the years) and continued on this way all the way through 1989, when they were finally split off as a separate department in their own right. So for most of the agency's existence it must've seemed like the most natural thing in the world to set aside bits of land like this for passive enjoyment from a moving vehicle[3], and the loops would probably be classified that way if they had remained in the state park system. But in 1953-54 this stretch of highway was bypassed by the shiny new Interstate freeway along the river. Unlike the famous stretch of the old road through the main waterfall corridor, this stretch of road was handed off to Hood River County, and was eventually gated off a mile or so further east of here after the closure of the Mosier Twin Tunnels. And, per state park policy at the time, since the place was no longer on a state highway, anything along the road was not a statewide concern anymore and the park was promptly handed off the the county along with the road. But things changed again with the 1980s revival of interest in the old highway, and at some point the state took it back and the land currently belongs to ODOT again.[4]

At this point I should note that while "passive enjoyment from a moving vehicle" may be the only intended use of the place, there are a couple of others. The main one, of course, is to drive or bike or I guess unicycle or street luge the tight corners here. Maybe even exceeding the posted speed limit at times. And then possibly turning around and doing it again a few more times, because practice makes perfect and all that. And at this point Legal wants me to point out that I am not at liberty to say exactly how I know all this, and you should absolutely positively not try this at home, not even if you're a professional driver on a closed course, and not even if you're driving a Model T -- which is nice and slow but makes up for that by being unsafe in countless other ways.

The other main thing you can do here is stop somewhere safe along the road and take photos, maybe film your friend descending the hill on inline skates, or drifting the loops really fast in a vintage Group B rally car they're restoring, something along those lines. Unlike the loops at Crown Point, there is at least a bit of a view from the top and from one curve to the next, and it seems like this would be a fairly compelling place to film a car commercial. They're always filming car commercials around Crown Point and at Rowena, and I suspect the whole Hood River Valley has been exhaustively scouted for potential filming locations, so it just stands to reason a few have been filmed here. But I haven't actually come across any yet, and in fact YouTube can't find anything at all under "Hood River Loops".

A third thing you could maybe do here is poke around and be a big history dweeb[5]. Though if you're interested in the old Columbia River Highway, I have to tell you that (other than the loops) not that much has survived intact from a century ago around here.

For one thing, just before the first curve (if you're going uphill) is a point where HCRH Milepost 67 ought to be, but isn't. ODOT's milepost map includes it, indicating there must have been one here within the last few years, but I looked around and didn't see one, and turned around and drove by again to be sure, and repeated the process once or twice and still couldn't find it, so (like a couple of other mileposts we met early on in that project) I suspect some clumsy driver sideswiped it within the last few years while trying to look cool here, and it's gone until ODOT gets around to making a new one.

On the other hand, there is an extant HCRH Milepost 68 just a mile up the road, shortly before the gate closing the road to car traffic. But that's the subject of a whole other upcoming post.

More importantly, just on the other side of the intersection with OR 35, the old highway crosses the Hood River, and you might think there would be a cool old historic bridge there, and in fact there used to be one, a triple-arch bridge built in 1918 in the usual Gorge bridge style, which in turn replaced a spindly sketchy rickety-looking 1866 bridge that looked like it was designed and built by people who were familiar with the concept of bridges but had never actually seen one. The 1918 bridge was demolished in 1982, replaced by a taller, and wider, and more practical, and safer, but utterly forgettable and utilitarian, concrete structure. I had made a mental note to take a couple of photos of it for the sake of completeness, and then forgot so completely that I only remembered months later, and I would bet money that I forget again the next time I'm in the area, or maybe stop to take photos and get bored and leave before actually taking any.


Footnote(s)


The loops here are mentioned in the caption of an Oregon State Archives photo of the Rowena Loops. Per ODOT's resident historian, Samuel Lancaster personally designed the Crown Point Loops near the Vista House, and after that other state highway engineers applied Lancaster's design principles to similar loops built at Rowena, here at Hood River, and the long-lost ones at Clatsop Crest on the Lower Columbia Highway.


On the map "Hood River Loops acquired to protect slopes.", dated 06/01/1922, the park is labeled as a "Roadside Development Area. Which was part of an old State Park classification scheme, per ODOT's 1940-1942 Biennial report (pages 114-115):

In order to avoid duplication of personnel and equipment, the Maintenance Department, beginning with the year 1941, assumed the maintenance of the roads and parking areas leading to and within State Highway parks. State parks were classified under three headings — Official State Parks, Minor Parks, and Roadside Development Areas. The Maintenance Department was charged with the betterment and maintenance of park roads and parking areas in all three of the classifications and with all betterment and maintenance of buildings and grounds in the minor parks and roadside developments. Betterment and maintenance of buildings and grounds in official state parks is a function of the Parks Department. There are 73 official parks, 44 minor parks and 33 roadside development areas.

Per the report for 1942-1944 at that point there were 76 areas designated as official state parks, 48 as minor state parks and 32 as roadside development areas, a total of 151 areas aggregating 46,868 acres. The report noted that park visitorship was down because of World War II. Some parks were closed entirely due to the war, like Bradley SP on the Columbia, I guess it must have provided too good of a view of what was going on along the river, as an endless stream of newly built ships headed downriver and out to sea from Portland shipyards -- Liberty Ships, and later Casablanca-class aircraft carriers. Additionally, there would have been a large volume of cargo ships headed to Vladivostok and other Soviet ports with cargo bound for the eastern front via the Trans-Siberian Railway. But I digress.

The 1948-50 report stopped breaking out the parks by the 1941 classification, and listed 181 units of all types totaling over 69,000 acres, plus a new system of 20 "roadside picnic areas", the origin of the current highway rest area system

Despite having "Development" right there in the name, RDAs tended to be small and generally had nothing in the way of park facilities, so I think the name was supposed to mean something like "Reserved for Future Development". From what I can tell, the state seems to have lost track of several of these over the years, so when they finally split state parks off from ODOT in the 1990s, by law anything related to state parks was supposed to transfer over to the new department, but places that had sort of fallen down the back of the sofa over time weren't on that list and ODOT still owns them.


Under today's weird overly-clinical naming scheme, a place like the Loops that you're supposed to admire from a moving car is a "State Scenic Corridor", like the H.B. Van Duzer corridor along OR18 on the way to Lincoln City. If you're supposed to admire it from a moving boat, it's a "State Scenic Waterway", like a big stretch of the Deschutes River. And if you can stop and take photos and admire the view from one place it's a "State Scenic Viewpoint", like Portland Womens Forum, and

If there's more to do than just admire the view, it's either a "State Recreation Site" (like Fishing Rock and many of the other small parks on the coast) or a "State Recreation Area" mostly depending on the size of the place. Some river parks are classified as State Recreation Areas rather than Scenic Waterways, and from what I can tell the difference is in what the river is like. If you can float downstream lazily admiring the scenery, it's a Scenic Waterway, and if you're hanging on for dear life barrelling over a never-ending series of rapids, it's a Recreation Area, and the dividing line is somewhere in between.

There are a few officially called "State Park", like the flagship one at Silver Falls. These are usually larger and have actual people staffing the place, at least during tourist season, and some of them (but not all) offer overnight camping. A "State Natural Area" or "State Natural Site" is sort of the opposite of that: No amenities, no developed visitor facilities, often no State Park sign welcoming you to the place. McLoughlin SNA in the Gorge is one of these. A "State Heritage Area" is a bit like a state park, but with history. If you like to watch people cosplaying as old timey pioneers, demonstrating old timey pioneer handicrafts, this is your best bet to experience that. Champoeg Park is probably the best-known of these. A "State Heritage Site" is smaller but still historical, albeit cosplay-free, like the Willamette Stone SHS in Portland's West Hills.


Later notes added to the 1922 map say most of the area was transferred to Hood River County in 1956, and another bit was sold in 1984. But apparently the state wanted the land back at some point after that, and owns it all again, per Hood River County GIS. Their page about the property now says it's taxlot number 03N11E31B01500, and its current size is 4.11 "Map Acres", or 7.56 "Assessor Acres". I'm not sure what the difference is, but one possibility is that the latter number includes the street right of way while the first number doesn't.


And this footnote is where I relate a historical anecdote I ran across that didn't really fit anywhere else. 1903 Hood River County land survey trying to resolve a boundary dispute between Mr. Frank Button and the Mt. Hood Lumber Company. The land in question fronted on both the Hood and Columbia Rivers, both of which had meandered enough over time that no earlier survey markers could be found in those areas. After a bit of this the surveyor (one John Leland Hudson, if I'm reading the signature correctly) throws up his hands on page 4 and says he can't proceed until he can obtain certified copies of the original General Land Office survey and all the field notes that went along with it.

The survey resumed a month later, with the necessary documents in hand, but any hope that this would clear things up were quickly dashed. Again the survey crew kept encountering survey markers that could not be found, as a lot of them had been placed relative to trees that were no longer there. Other markers turned up in the wrong place, due in part to egregious errors by a previous (and now retired) County Surveyor, which often did not align with the original egregious errors made by the US General Land Office surveyor. Hudson directed much of his ire at the latter:

I found no two courses, (where all are supposed N. and S.), parallel in the whole claim, S., E., and W. bdys. Nor did I find more than one measurement as given in the field notes. The U.S. Deputy Sur. must have been either drunk, crazy, or a fool. A worse piece of surveying, I never before saw, done by a U.S. Deputy Surveyor.

Ouch! Hudson then explains how he corrected several errors of basic arithmetic in the previous surveys, and determined the correct boundary accordingly, and wraps up with another dig at the original surveyor:

This U.S. Deputy Surveyor, Mr. L.F. Cartee, must have been a “Jim Dandy”. Dr. Adams says his name was Cartee, but the Notes make it Carter.

And now having established the line of division between the said Frank H. Button and the said Mt. Hood Lumber Company, in manner as aforesaid, and to the best of my ability, I quit the survey and job, and am d——d glad to say good-bye.

Not quite as dramatic an exit as popping the emergency escape slide, but pretty dramatic for a land survey narrative, as these things are usually dry as dust. And there are hints that this was just the tip of the iceberg: Mr. Button, one of the parties to the dispute, was also somehow made part of the survey crew when it resumed. That work partly relied on the recollections of that error-prone retired county surveyor, who seems to have been some sort of local power broker that people deferred to. So it's possible Hudson may have found himself at odds with the local good ol' boy network just by trying to do his job by the book. I may also be reading way too much into this stuff.

A later coda: ODOT map 1R-2-498, titled "Acquired from F.H. Button Est. for Stock Pile Site", September 1937. But they may have gotten a bit ahead of themselves; a cursive note in pencil says simply "Would not sell. Jan 1938"