Showing posts with label oregon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oregon. Show all posts

Saturday, August 17, 2024

Forest Road NF-20, Larch Mountain

Ok, so the last Columbia Gorge Forest Service road we looked at (NF-1500-150) was a tad underwhelming. Hopefully this next one is a bit more interesting. We're still poking around on the south side of Larch Mountain Road, this time at the crossroads where Larch Mountain Road meets (gated) Palmer Mill Road, around milepost 10. The seasonal snow gate goes up here in the winter. Today we're exploring Forest Road NF-20, which is sort of a continuation of Palmer Mill that continues south, curving around the side of Larch Mountain and continuing on toward points unknown deep within the forbidden Bull Run Watershed. So far this probably sounds a lot like Forest Road NF-1509, and it is, with a couple of differences.

Like NF-1509 and the upper portion of Palmer Mill (aka NF-1520), NF-20 was gated off sometime in the late 90s due to undesirable uses of the area. Then in 2010 the Forest Service went a step further and decommissioned NF-20, evidently with a great deal of enthusiasm and an unusually big budget. Which means they daylight every culvert under the road, grind up any asphalt that might be there and cart some of it away, then go through with an excavator and dig a sort of tank trap pit every so often, to make the road impassable by any sort of vehicle, and by people on foot if possible, then remove it from all maps, never speak of it again, and deny it ever existed, under penalty of I'm not sure what exactly. As you'll see in the photoset here, returning the forest to something resembling a pre-road natural state was not a goal, so the finished state is a long line of little hills and pits with a lot of clumps of old asphalt lying around. On the other hand, I suspect this treatment would work really well against the tanks of an invading army, should we ever need that.

I turned around and went back at a multiway intersection of Forest Service roads, which is close to the Bull Run boundary, and I seem to recall that all but the rightmost of the available roads continue into the Forbidden Zone, so those are out. The remaining road takes you to the big powerline corridor, and after a short distance strolling under the buzzing wires you can connect to NF-1509 and make a loop of it. The main problem with this loop is that getting back to your vehicle (assuming you brought a vehicle) will involve a stroll along Larch Mountain Road, which has a lot of fast drivers who aren't expecting to see pedestrians through here. A bike would help for this part, but it would be kind of useless now on the NF-20 part of the loop. I dunno, I have no useful advice here, but I'm sure you'll figure something out if you decide to try it.

The only other intersection or trail crossing or what-have-you that you'll encounter is closer to the start of the road. NF-20 crosses a small stream and intersects a trail that runs parallel to the stream, heading steeply uphill without switchbacks. There are no signs to explain this, but I'm fairly sure the trail is actually County Road 550, which was once the main road up Larch Mountain from 1891-ish until 1937 when the current road opened. The county never actually vacated it after the big rerouting happened, and the unused old road just sort of faded away into the forest over time. But it still legally exists on paper, as the county never officially abandoned it. (You can see the county's collection of these on this ArcGIS layer. It's a map of "local access roads", the county's term for roads it owns but feels it has no legal obligation to maintain.)

I think I've found one end of Road 550 over near the Donahue Creek Trail, or technically a bit of County Road 458 heading to the long-abandoned town of Brower, where the 550 branches off, in theory. On paper the old road heads due east and straight uphill, crossing Larch Mountain Road (though I can't find any surviving traces of that intersection) and vaguely tracking along the section line a mile north of the Stark St. survey baseline. After crossing NF-20, instead of climbing to the very top of Larch Mountain it turns south and curves around the side of the mountain instead, running roughly parallel with NF-20 and a bit uphill of it. Eventually it, too, enters the Bull Run zone, and probably once connected some godforsaken logging camps to the outside world, so long as it hadn't rained recently. Evidently when it came time to build the scenic viewpoint on top of the mountain, and a modern paved road with two normal-width lanes to get you there, the powers that be decided to just ditch the existing road and start over from scratch. I may try to check out the 550 at some point since I'm curious how much of it still exists, though my expectations are pretty low and I wouldn't say it's a top priority.

Anyway, regarding the NF-20 and what happened to it, 2010 doc from Zigzag Ranger District about that year's round of road decommissioning explains further, and makes it clear they knew Putin-proofing the road would be a bit disruptive for the slow trickle of visitors who used it, but went ahead and did it anyway:

page 70:

The Gordon Creek area is located on the western flanks of popular and scenic Larch Mountain. It is the watershed for the town of Corbett. Forest Road 15 takes recreationists to nearly the summit of Larch Mountain ending at Sherrard Point Picnic Area with views of five Cascade peaks. The road system south west of the road to the summit, Roads 20 and 1509 were blocked with gates more than ten years ago due to illegal target shooting, dumping and other inappropriate uses that could adversely affect the Corbett Watershed. The loop roads behind the gates are used by dispersed recreationists for mountain bike riding, horseback riding, hiking, hunting, and special forest product collection. Gating the area has greatly reduced the previous dumping and target shooting problems.

page 73:

Alternative 2 would decommission Forest Road 20 and several spur roads in the area effectively eliminating the “Road 1509-Road 20 loop” used by hikers and mountain bikers. It is possible hikers may still be able to access the loop, but mountain bikes may be displaced.

Which brings us to the main reason anyone still ventures down the former road. In the Northwest, "special forest products" typically means mushroom picking, which is big business around these parts. In the eastern US it can mean wild ginseng ( https://www.fs.usda.gov/wildflowers/Native_Plant_Materials/americanginseng/index.shtml ), while in Oregon state forests the list includes "Truffles, Mushrooms, Alder or Corral poles, Beargrass, Ferns, Huckleberry, Manzanita, Rock, Salal". If you're curious how this works in practice, here's a 2019 Zach Urness article at the Salem Statesman-Journal about obtaining and using a permit for collecting sword ferns.

In any case, a Mt. Hood National Forest map of legal mushroom-picking zones includes a corridor along either side of the road formerly known as NF-20, despite the road no longer existing from a legal standpoint. In practice, the gravel roller coaster ride they made is still the only useful access into the picking area. This is one of the few parts of the whole National Forest where this is allowed -- the only other one north of the Bull Run watershed is a bit of the Bonneville powerline corridor along Tanner Creek, outside of both the National Scenic Area and Bull Run. Inside the National Scenic Area it's currently not legal anywhere and evidently not a high priority for them. The linked page explains that, by law and in theory, they could allow mushroom hunting, but even now they're still a very new unit of the National Forest system (established in 1986, which is almost yesterday by federal bureaucracy standards) and they've had higher priorities and just haven't had time or money to perform the full environmental analysis they would have to do first.

Which is not to say there hasn't been any research done. Here are a couple of Forest Service docs: "Handbook to Strategy 1 Fungal Species in the Northwest Forest Plan" and "Handbook to Additional Fungal Species of Special Concern in the Northwest Forest Plan", both part of a survey of fungi known to be present in Northern Spotted Owl habitat. It's not that owls eat mushrooms directly; as I understand it, the idea is that they indicate general forest health, and you never know if one might be a key part of the spotted owl food web, especially if the number and distribution of species is poorly known. Plus it's basic research fieldwork that generally doesn't get funded on its own.

Speaking of mushrooms, and the variability that comes with eating things that some rando found in the forest, a recent food poisoning case out of Bozeman, Montana was linked to either morel mushrooms (which are generally recognized as edible), or possibly false morels, which are quite bad for you. Evidently the toxic component in this event was a chemical called hydrazine (or maybe a precursor chemical that turns into hydrazine when eaten), which is often used as a spacecraft propellant because it's simple to ignite, meaning it spontaneously combusts on contact with all sorts of things. In fact NASA and the US Air Force are working on a 'green' alternative fuel to replace hydrazine because it's is so dangerous (and therefore expensive) to work with. 2013 Proton rocket launch accident, to give you some idea.

And since we're off topic already, it turns out that hydrazine is also the stuff of myth and legend in the drag racing community, spoken of in hushed tones, comment sections full of stern warnings from surviving oldtimers:

And I can't really go off on a tangent like this without recommending John Drury Clark's 1972 book Ignition!, concerning the early days of liquid fuel rocket research. Here, the author reminisces about chlorine trifluoride, another rather alarming substance:

“It is, of course, extremely toxic, but that’s the least of the problem. It is hypergolic with every known fuel, and so rapidly hypergolic that no ignition delay has ever been measured. It is also hypergolic with such things as cloth, wood, and test engineers, not to mention asbestos, sand, and water-with which it reacts explosively. It can be kept in some of the ordinary structural metals-steel, copper, aluminium, etc.-because of the formation of a thin film of insoluble metal fluoride which protects the bulk of the metal, just as the invisible coat of oxide on aluminium keeps it from burning up in the atmosphere. If, however, this coat is melted or scrubbed off, and has no chance to reform, the operator is confronted with the problem of coping with a metal-fluorine fire. For dealing with this situation, I have always recommended a good pair of running shoes.”

Saturday, November 26, 2022

Rowena Plateau, June 2022 (II)

As promised in part I back in August, here are more photos from the Nature Conservancy preserve at Rowena, OR, taken back in June around the tail end of desert wildflower season. These were taken with an old Sony DSLR from Goodwill and a couple of equally old Sony/Minolta lenses, including a 50mm macro lens that I've decided I'm a huge fan of. If there's a trick to taking sorta-ok macro photos, without a tripod, on a windy day in the Gorge, I guess it would be to just take a ton of photos to boost the odds you'll get some decent ones between wind gusts. If I was actually trying to make money off this stuff it would probably help to find a really pretentious way to phrase that, maybe some mumbo-jumbo about the zen of inhabiting the still spaces inside the wind, and offer to teach people how to do that in expensive multi-day workshops. If only I could say all that with a straight face, and I was more of a people person, and also unscrupulous.

In any case, I unfortunately don't have an ID on the beetle in the first couple of photos. You can kind of make out that it has tiny hairs on its thorax that pick up pollen as it wanders around this arrowleaf balsamroot flower, sipping on nectar (or eating pollen, or whatever it's doing.) It seems reasonable to guess that some pollination happens while it goes about its business.

As the saying goes, the plural of "anecdote" is not "data", but a brief search came back with a few other photos on the internet of similar beetles on balsamroot flowers, so at minimum this is not a one-off occurrence: Someone's Flickr photo (taken further east on the Washington side of the Gorge), and stock photos on Getty Images and Alamy The Alamy one shows a pair of pollen-covered beetles mating on the side of a balsamroot flower, so it may not be safe for work if your boss is an especially prudish entomologist.

But I haven't seen anything in writing saying the plant is pollinated by such-and-such beetle. I did run across a 2005 study on the pollination needs of the plant. It notes that essentially no previous studies had been done on pollination for the whole balsamroot genus, but then zooms in on the habits of a couple of native bee species and never mentions beetles at all. The study was motivated by practical concerns, namely an interest in growing balsamroot seed commercially, as the plant seems to be good for habitat restoration, and both livestock and wildlife seem to think it's delicious. There are already other seed crops that rely on native bees, such as Eastern Washington's alfalfa seed industry and its dependence on alkali bees, so maybe it just seemed natural to focus on that and not the care and feeding of some weird desert beetle. And admittedly this beetle didn't seem to be in any great hurry to buzz away to the next flower, which helps if you want photos, not so much if you're an international seed conglomerate and your CEO needs a new yacht.

So we're at a dead end regarding beetles, but a Forest Service info page about the plant has a couple of other unrelated nuggets. First, it describes the flowers as "bigger than a silver dollar but smaller than a CD; about the size of a small floppy disk", which is overly wordy but gives you a strong clue as to the age of the author. Later, toward the end when it describes the plant's culinary and medicinal uses, it says cryptically that "The root could be used as a coffee substitute", without elaborating any further. A page at Eat The Planet repeats the claim, as do a lot of other search results, but nobody on the whole wide internet says whether the resulting beverage is regular or decaf. Which to me is the one key detail about anything described as a coffee substitute. No caffeine and it's just another way to make hot water taste bitter, which is not so interesting. Either way, the public deserves answers.

Saturday, October 24, 2020

Beaver Falls

Ok, next up we're doing the short hike to Beaver Falls, along a stretch of the old Columbia River Highway between Rainier and Clatskanie, on the way to Astoria. This waterfall is not exactly famous, and the surrounding area isn't touristy, and the present-day road doesn't look particularly significant, and this would be a prime opportunity for me to score some hipster points explaining how incredibly obscure everything is, if hipster points were a thing worth having. Right up there with listing off bands nobody on the planet has ever heard of, or chuckling when someone mispronounces your favorite artisanal goat breed, or whatever.

For readers outside the Northwest, or who aren't familiar with this ongoing occasional project of mine, here's a little background. The original Columbia River Highway was a major engineering project of the early 20th century, promoted as the region's first 'modern' road -- by Model T-era standards -- with one section heading east from Portland to The Dalles and points east -- including the famous tourist-clogged stretch through the Columbia River Gorge -- and another leg (the Lower Columbia River Highway) going westbound to Astoria and the coast. The highway was designed to showcase the region, wandering around the landscape in search of waterfalls and other scenery, with state-of-the-art concrete bridges, and walls and other structures built by Italian stone masons. Unfortunately as the only modern road in the area, and the only road at all in some areas, it made itself obsolete almost immediately thanks to induced demand & was replaced by bigger, better, faster, wider, straighter ultra-modern boring roads starting in the 1940s, with this stretch getting the treatment in 1955.

As with the eastern leg of the highway, the bypassed bits and pieces of the old road typically became lightly-used side roads or were abandoned entirely, and scenic highlights along these parts quickly faded into obscurity. But unlike the stretch through the Gorge, the surviving parts on the way to Astoria don't have road signs, or shiny new ODOT-funded bike paths, or glossy guidebooks, or really any publicity at all. But the roads themselves are still there, and the scenic bits that were there a century ago are still there, if you know where to look. The waterfalls are maybe not of the same scale or quantity as in the Gorge -- which is famous for a reason -- but fame draws crowds, and like a lot of people I'm all about avoiding crowds right now. Beaver Falls did get a brief bit of attention back in July when an Oregonian article covered it as one of several waterfalls that weren't barricaded off for the ongoing pandemic. Which actually was very useful information, since nobody seems to be tracking which destinations are currently open and which aren't across the region, and I'm not inclined to make the long drive without knowing that little detail.

I think I ought to start by explaining how to get there, or at least how I got there, and then I'll get to the trail and the falls themselves. The fastest and easiest way -- which is not what I did -- is to just stay on US 30 westbound past Rainier until the the turnoff for Beaver Falls Road at the tiny sorta-town of Delena, then stay on the road for another 3.6 miles. You'll see an unsigned parking lot on your left with room for maybe a dozen cars (this is a guess; I did not actually count the cars when I was there). GPS coordinates for the parking lot, not the falls, are 46.1038712, -123.1282997, if that helps at all.

As for what I actually did, I'd noticed that there was another stretch of the old highway starting in downtown Rainier, and I wanted to see what it was like while I was in the area. Rainier and Clatskanie are both right at river level, but there's a hill between them, and the Columbia bends north for a bit at that point and then back. So to go between the two towns you either follow the river several miles out of the way (like the railroad line does), or go over the hill, which is what both the old and current highways do. But while today's US 30 just goes directly up and over the hill and down the other side, the original route made several switchbacks ascending from downtown Rainier, and then followed Beaver Creek down the other side before bending south into downtown Clatskanie.

I haven't figured out how to embed a Google map with custom directions -- I could swear I've done that before, but now the embeddable map reverts to the default route on US 30, which I don't want -- but at least I can still make a link showing the old route, so you can see what it looks like in another tab. As you can see there, the old route (which now goes by "Old Rainier Road") starts south of 30, at the west end of downtown Rainier. By accident I actually turned off 30 a bit before the map does, and drove around in downtown Rainier a bit looking for where I'd planned to be, and ran across an unrelated historic bridge in the process, but didn't stop for photos & eventually found the turn I wanted. In any case, it climbs the hill via the switchbacks I mentioned, but unfortunately this stretch of the old highway clearly hasn't been paved in ages, and the forest around it is overgrown and starting to encroach on the road, giving that stretch a weird claustrophobic feel. Parts of the road have very old guardrails that might date back to the state highway days; these are in poor shape, unfortunately, and it's clear they've been crashed into a lot over however many decades they've been there.

A note at Recreating the HCRH says there was once a state highway wayside somewhere along this stretch (the "Ditto Wayside", named for local philanthropists), with a trail to some nearby springs. But there isn't a wayside or viewpoint here now, nor is there much of a view anymore thanks to trees growing over the last century or so. I even checked the Columbia County GIS system out of curiosity, in case it was still there somewhere but overgrown and forgotten, but it shows no public property nearby, so maybe the state unloaded it after the road stopped being a state highway.

At the top of the hill the road improves and you're in ordinary rural country for a while til you get back to US 30 at the tiny burg of Alston, with the next segment of old road just across the highway. The intersection is a little sketchy, but there's bound to be a gap in traffic eventually and then you can scoot across when nobody's looking. The road heads west from there as Alston Rd. for a few blocks, and then you have to merge onto 30 just for a few hundred feet or so before leaving it again at the Beaver Falls Road turnoff I mentioned earlier.

So however you got to Beaver Falls Road, one thing you'll notice on the way to the trailhead is that the road crosses and recrosses Beaver Creek several times on old bridges that look original to the century-old road, or at least inspired by the originals. Somewhere along that stretch, two miles upstream from Beaver Falls is where you'd stop to go look at Upper Beaver Falls, if only you knew where to stop. I wasn't sure where it was, exactly, so I skipped that side trip and continued on to the main event. The parking lot for the main falls was easier to find, since there were other cars there and a seasonal official sign next to the trailhead warning visitors about county forest fire rules. A blog post from February 2017 I ran across showed no such list of rules or any other sort of sign for the falls, so knowing you're in the right place might be a little harder in the off season.

From the trailhead, a short but kind of rocky trail leads down to the falls. I should point out that photos taken in August will not really do the falls justice; unlike falls in the Gorge, Beaver Creek doesn't have high altitude snowmelt feeding it in the summer, and it dwindles to a fraction of its winter and springtime volume. August is when I got the idea to go visit, and I sadly don't have a way to fast-forward us all to maybe mid-April 2021 so we can go see them then instead. And the additional tradeoff with waiting until next spring is that I gather the trail gets slippery and treacherous when wet. It also would've helped, photo-wise, if I'd stopped by at any time of day other than when the sun was directly above the falls and you have to bob and weave and shade your phone with one hand trying to keep both the sun and your hand out of your shot. All I can say to that is that I certainly wanted to take quality photos of the falls, but sleeping in on weekend mornings is also pretty great, and I feel like I struck a reasonable balance among several competing priorities. I may go back at some point to find the other waterfall upstream and maybe take some bridge photos if there's anywhere to park to do that. If I do that, I may give Beaver Falls another try too, and the upper falls too if I can find them.

I should point out herethat that although the wider world may have forgotten Beaver Falls, it's still a popular local swimming hole, and there were more people there than I would've preferred to encounter while hiking during a pandemic, and mask use was far from universal (ugh), though I obviously lived to tell the tale this time. The falls are about 50 feet high, with a deep pool at the base, and teens were jumping from the top of the falls while I was there. I suppose they've probably all done this hundreds of times and learned how from older teens, and almost nobody ever lands headfirst or hits a rock or tangles with the submerged car wreckage the Oregonian article insists is somewhere down in the deep pool below the falls. But it still stressed me out a little. I don't really have a rational basis for this, just a random worry someone might try an extreme new stunt for the first time just then and it would go badly, I guess. Everybody was fine; I just didn't stay as long as I would have, otherwise. Retraced my steps back to the parking lot, then continued along the remaining bit of old highway into Clatskanie, and got on present-day Highway 30 to head home.

For what it's worth, I did actually verify this is a county park and not just a traditional local trespassin' spot where the owner almost never shows up with a shotgun. I kind of like to double-check that sort of thing before encouraging random internet strangers to do something I did. It's not shown as a park on Google Maps, nor is it listed on the county parks website, so I figured it was at least an open question. So I checked the county GIS system again and sure enough, the system says it's called "Beaver Falls Park", 29.06 acres, with a map tax lot number of 7412-00-00601, in case anyone out there wants to triple-check my double-checking. I gather that the county classifies it as "unimproved" despite the trail and the parking lot, which may be why they don't really advertise that it exists, and why they stick to encouraging you not to set the forest on fire, and don't post any friendly "Welcome to Beaver Falls County Park, this way to the falls, lodge and spa that way." signage. The trail is surprisingly new, too; the county updated the master plan for its 24 parks in 2007, and putting in a trail was one of the suggested future improvements back then. In 2009 there was an ODOT-funded road project [doc] here, repaving this stretch of road, installing vintage-looking guardrails, and adding fencing so people could safely view the falls from the road. It doesn't mention anything about working on parking at the trailhead, or about a trailhead existing at that point, but I'm not sure whether that counts as a data point.

I kept reading that Beaver Falls was much more well-known decades ago, and faded out of public awareness after the highway was rerouted. Which stands to reason, I guess, but it made wonder whether the falls had ever been all that famous, and if so, what it had been like back in that era. So I took another dive back into the local library's historic newspaper databases to see if I could find anything interesting about the place, whether about the falls themselves, the highway and how it came to be, the doings of local residents in the Greater Beaver Falls metro area, that sort of thing. The finished product ended up as more of a story about the road than the falls, and to some degree about reporters who covered the new road, and various old cars they made the journey in.

Let me point out that "Beaver Falls" is not one of the easier keyword searches, so I might have missed a thing or two while wading through all the noise. The Northwest's early US settlers seem to have been a literal-minded, unimaginative bunch, so except for a few places where they decided to swipe an existing native name, places ended up with generic names like "Beaver Falls" and "Beaver Creek", along with Deer, Eagle, Salmon, etc. creeks. A Gnat Creek exists elsewhere in the northern coast range, and it apparently sports a few waterfalls too, though the name may cut down on the tourist trade. Other uncreative names include Whale Cove, Elk Rock, Wildcat Mountain, probably all named due to some early pioneer seeing an animal nearby. And when they didn't name a creek after an animal, they went with some mundane aspect of the creek: Big Creeek, or Deep, or Silver (as in whitewater); or Mill Creek if somebody built a sawmill on a creek before naming the creek; or if the first thing they noticed was a waterfall, Fall Creek, or maybe Falls Creek if they saw more than one. And then falls are often named after the creek, like Pup Creek Falls recently. The falls here have sometimes gone by Beaver Creek Falls. Fall Creek Falls is not uncommon, and elsewhere in the state there's a Falls City Falls, in which the falls are named for the town that's named for the falls. If another waterfall is found later and it needs a name too, it becomes Upper or Lower Animal Creek Falls. If the creek forks, you get stuff like North and South Falls at Silver Falls State Park, and yes, there's an Upper North Falls.

So the oldest mention of the 'right' Beaver Falls that I ran across was an April 2nd 1899 news item (predating the highway by roughly 20 years) relating someone's visit to the falls during a recent fishing trip. It describes the falls much as they are today, albeit with very different directions for getting there:

The falls are eight miles from Mayger's Landing on the Columbia River, and six miles from Beaver Station, on the Astoria railroad. The county road to Beaver Valley, in good weather, is passable for bicycles. From the end of the county road to the falls is about 1 1/2 miles on a poor trail, through the brush and in the bed of the creek.
The article was published as a small item on that day's Woman's Page. Much of of the rest of the page is devoted to 1899's most fashionable looks for Easter direct from New York and abroad, meaning lots of corsets and embroidery, and elaborate hats with feathers from the world's endangered birds.

The next mention of the Beaver Falls area came in 1909, as Columbia County voted on adopting Prohibition countywide. Voters rejected the idea (though it eventually passed statewide in 1914), with Clatskanie rejecting it narrowly and Rainier by a nearly 2:1 margin. At press time, results were not yet in for Beaver Falls and a couple of other then-remote precincts. The article states they were expected to vote majority-dry, though it's not clear how or why the writer would have known that.

Then we get to the origins of the old highway, starting with "Boulevard to Pacific Ocean Would Be Scenic Marvel", February 18th 1912. In which department store magnate (and future governor) Julius Meier explained in great detail how amazing it would be if there was a road to the coast -- which he insisted would be both practical and affordable -- and announced he was forming a lobbying group to bring this road into being. It seems that Clatskanie-area boosters were the ones who had first sold him on this route, and so Meier spent a large portion of the article explaining how their stretch of the Lower Columbia region would soon be densely populated and incredibly prosperous, perhaps a second Holland in the making. (Many wetlands along the river were being diked and drained for farming around this time, so there was a superficial resemblance). Toward the end he pointed out that Portland would need to kick in some cash toward the road, as Clatskanie had not, as yet, made a great deal of progress toward its destiny as a future Amsterdam-on-the-Columbia.

Meier apparently had enough pull with his fellow movers and shakers that the road was already in the works by October of that year, with the eventual route largely decided upon, including the route along Beaver Creek on the way to Clatskanie. In an October 13th 2012 article "Bowlby Opines on Highway Plan", highway promoters had invited Major H.L. Bowlby -- former Washington highway commissioner, and current head of the Pacific Highway Association, a "Good Roads" lobbying group -- to travel the proposed route and offer his expert opinions on the project. He was enthusiastic overall, with a few minor quibbles and some platitudes about listening to the locals while planning the final route. He went on to explain that these sorts of projects were usually financed with public bond measures and paid off over 20 or 30 years, and the proposed highway would likely need to do this.

County voters passed the needed bond measure in February 1914 by a vote of 1695 to 1162. The measure came to $360k overall (about $9,357,048 in 2020 dollars), with $260k of that dedicated to the new highway, and the balance spread around the inland parts of the county to try to win support for the measure. Which largely didn't work; the vote breakdown by precinct showed lopsided votes in favor from cities and towns along the proposed highway route -- the riverside mill town of Prescott voting 45 to 1 in favor, as an extreme example -- and lopsided votes against it elsewhere, with the inland town of Yankton voting 9 to 112 against the idea. The most historically significant detail of this election is mentioned in a brief aside: "A total vote of 2857 was cast, in most places the women taking an active part in the voting.". Women's suffrage had finally been approved by the state's all-male electorate in 1912, on the sixth attempt, so this special election would have been the first, or among the first, that did not disenfranchise a majority of the population. The article spent more words assuring voters that the county already had a project manager lined up and construction ought to begin in early spring.

Skipping forward a year, it turns out that Maj. Bowlby's 1912 visit had been more of a job interview than a consulting gig, and he'd landed the overall chief engineering job for the Portland-to-Astoria stretch of the highway. Unfortunately things were not going well. In an article "Columbia County Faces Road Crisis" (March 12th 1915), we learn that the project was substantially over budget, and the county was already running low on cash despite the earlier bond measure. The entire county court had recently been recalled and replaced because of the troubled project, and some residents were calling for Bowlby to be fired, largely from the south side of the county (St. Helens & Scappoose), which had not received a lot of new roadwork at that point in the project. The idea was that the south side already had adequate roads to Portland so the route of the highway would use them rather than building a new road, at least for the time being. Which to me sounds like the right decision, financially, but locals just saw construction being weighted heavily toward Rainier & Clatskanie and were jealous about it. The article includes a couple of grainy photos, one of a large rock wall similar to those on the more famous parts of the highway thru the Gorge, and another of some dignitaries looking at a completed section of road. These photos were in relation to a recent construction incident where some brand-new dry stonework along the road had collapsed. An assistant state highway engineer responsible for day-to-day operations blamed the collapse on contractors' use of cheap non-Italian labor.

He has a theory that the Italian workmen alone know how to build dry walls; that the art was handed down to them from the ancient Romans, whose walls in various parts of Europe remain standing after centuries of use.

The scandal stayed in the headlines over the next few days. In "Misunderstanding of Finances Cause of Columbia Road Crisis" (March 16th 1915), we learn more about how the county got itself into this pickle. It seems that one reason locals were so upset over cost overruns was that during the bond measure campaign, pro-highway advocates had promised, or at least strongly implied, that state government matching funds would pay for a big chunk of the project. It turned out, post-election, that pro-road advocates weren't actually authorized to make any such promise on behalf of the state, and precisely zero dollars arrived from Salem after county voters agreed to kick in their chunk of the tab. The article points out that the entire state highway department budget was only $240k per year at the time and the state simply didn't have that kind of money.

The March 16th article also has two photos; one of Beaver Falls, with a narrow wooden footbridge above it, and another of a modern concrete bridge over the creek. The footbridge above the falls would have been associated with a sawmill that operated above the falls until around 1917, when the local supply of trees worth cutting had been depleted. The original plan at the mill had been to build a splash dam above the falls: You build a temporary dam, let it fill with water and dump all of your logs into it until it's nice and full. Then you break the dam, and let the resulting flash flood wash your logs downstream to somewhere where you can collect them at your leisure. Which I guess could be a practical way to move logs around without building any roads or railroad tracks, assuming you'd done the math right and had stored up enough water to get your logs from point A to point B. The people behind this scheme had not done their math right, and promptly went bankrupt.

In any case, another article "Bowlby Crisis Now Delays Road Work" appeared the next day (March 17th 1915), rehashing the many complaints about Bowlby and his project. The primary ones being that the road was going to cost more than residents felt they'd been promised; that it was also taking longer than promised, in part due to fights with contractors and some ugly eminent domain battles; and that Bowlby was somehow overspending on surveying and design work. Apart from the eminent domain stuff, a lot of that sounds eerily familiar to me even though over a century has passed and I just make software and not highways. A new additional anti-Bowlby complaint was that the route of the highway through St. Helens would bypass the city center and instead run parallel to an existing rail line a mile outside town. Which seems like a fair complaint, honestly; bypassing the county seat and largest town that way does seem like a strange thing to do. However it's also undoubtedly the reason central St. Helens remains cute and historic today. So that actually paid off in the end, though there was no way the people of 1915 could have known that. The article largely stems from an interview with one of the county court members ousted in the earlier recall, so the listed complaints were not exactly coming from an unbiased obbserver.

So this project that was in familiar trouble was faced with the same eternal engineering tradeoff as every other troubled project since the beginning of time. You have three options: You can add resources -- more money, more workers, etc. -- but there was clearly no more money to be had just then; you can stretch out the schedule -- but the previous articles made it clear the public & authorities were already restless over how long it was taking; or you can satisfy the previous two constraints by just doing less -- cutting the scope of the project, or the quality of the finished product. One of the links above -- and I forgot to make a note as to which one -- indicated they'd found a few areas where they could save money and time by just not building a few stretches of the road at first, where there was an existing road they could make do with for now. I'm not sure what this was called in 1915; a more contemporary term is "value engineering", and in the software world you're delivering an MVP, or Minimum Viable Product. So they figured out what their MVP looked like: 1.) Given a sufficiently powerful contemporary car, you could start driving from Portland in the morning, and arrive at the beach in time for dinner. and 2.) Some nontrivial part of the road had to be new or improved, so voters could see they'd gotten some return on their investment. And I've been involved in enough of these things to know the implicit 3rd item: The missing parts you didn't have time or money to build or debug are just annoying enough that it shakes loose additional funding to finish the job. But not so annoying that people switch back to the train, or try a different road, or go with a competing software product. With all of that in mind, a big gala grand opening celebration was scheduled for August 1915, just a few months away.

The PR blitz for the new road ramped up weeks ahead of the big day. In a July 18th article, "Julius L. Meier One of the First to Urge Lower Columbia Highway", the paper offered a glowing -- even fawning -- profile going on and on about Meier's foresight in recognizing the need for the road, and his practical ability in organizing the pro-road campaign, and then went on and on about how much prosperity was coming now that the road was (supposedly) almost a reality. This was quickly followed by "Columbia Highway Beauty Described", August 8th, by Meier himself. Among the highlights he mentions are the stone work along the highway at Prescott Point, near Goble; the highway loops ascending Bugby Heights (formerly Bugby Mountain); and the view from the hilltop outside Rainier. Beaver Creek only got a brief mention in connection with the new highway eventually opening up the area to farming, since they ony wanted to talk about the finished parts of the road just then, and the Beaver Creek part was nowhere near being done.

The long-awaited grand opening was chronicled in "Columbia Highway to Sea Christened", August 13th, in which a 40-car convoy of dignitaries made the 135-mile journey from Portland to Astoria, and then down the coast to the ritzy resort town of Gearhart, in less than seven hours, not counting stops for grand opening ceremonies in various towns along the way, or for digging Meier's car (also carrying the governor and one of the state's US Senators) out of sand it had gotten stuck in further toward the coast. The stretch between Rainier and Clatskanie wasn't complete yet -- the article explains there were just a few bridges over Beaver Creek that weren't finished -- and the convoy had to use a steep, rustic forest road for that portion of their expedition.

Cadillac "8" Makes First Trip Over Highway to Sea, August 15th, a lengthy first-person account from a car The Oregonian sent out ahead of the big convoy. Strictly speaking the journalists were guests of the car's owner, and the paper didn't splurge on a new Cadillac for the occasion. The article raves about the car almost as much as the road. The article claimed Little Jack Falls (along a now-abandoned stretch of highway near Prescott, south of Rainier) was the only waterfall along the road, which would have been true at the time, as nearby Jack Falls tends to dry up in the summer. They had gotten lost heading west from Rainier, and then were unsure of the route again at Delena, so they may have been nowhere near Beaver Falls. The article makes it very clear that the road was still very much under constructon along much of its route, and they kept encountering road crews making frantic last-minute fixes ahead of the dignitaries' arrival.

"Reo Makes Astoria Run in Five Hours", September 12th 1915. This was by Chester A. Moores, the paper's auto editor -- who also wrote the recent Cadillac piece -- and covered largely the same trip as the previous articles. By this point a journey like this had already moved off the front page to the paper's automobile section, next to the car ads. Readers were reassured that you didn't to splurge on a Cadillac to get to the beach; the solidly middle-class REO was up to the job and could even take a turn at rescuing other motorists whose less-sturdy vehicles couldn't handle some downhill sections of the road. (A new REO touring car started at $1250 in 1915 dollars, about $32k now, while a new Cadillac "8" Type 51 started at $1975, roughly $51k in 2020 money). The article has a photo of Little Jack Falls (which the highway ran right at the base of) and another of the long climb up Clatsop Crest (formerly Bugby Heights), and describes the Clatskanie area as a miniature Holland. In other 1915 automotive news, remote starting of a car via the miracle of radio waves was being demonstrated for the first time at the Indiana State Fair: Every five minutes, crowds were wowed by a Model 83 Overland being started by a signal from the Overland factory five miles away, sent by a large and very stationary transmitter. So not exactly a practical device yet. Also the state highway department had issued a statement clarifying how the new auto registration laws worked, confirming that yes, in general you would have to pay the full $2 annual registration fee even if you'd owned the car for less than a year, although if you'd owned it for a month or less when the fees came due you only had to pay $1. And a Chigago gentleman named Otto Nordbo was seeking a car manufacturer to sponsor him as he proposed to drive from New York to San Francisco without eating. He claimed this would demonstrate just how safe modern cars were, and insisted that he knew what he was doing, as he had previously completed a 30 day fast, albeit without driving anywhere.

Moores made the trip again in August 1916, this time riding along with the local Kissel Kar dealer in a shiny new Hundred-Point Six. The car's big claim to fame was that it had both a convertible top for the summer (as seen in the article), and a removable hardtop for the rest of the year. Like many of the era's smaller car companies, Kissel fell on hard times in the Depression and stopped making cars in 1930, per an owners' club history. Moores's account pointed out a number of still-unfinished spots along the highway, but found nothing impassable along the way. Following local advice in Rainier, the adventurers took the longer river route west to Clatskanie, bypassing the whole Beaver Creek area.

Which brings us to a November 26th 1916 article, in which we learn that despite the grand opening, and all the assurances about just a few finishing touches remaining, the Delena-to-Clatskanie segment was still only half-completed over 15 months later, with nine (!) more bridges over Beaver Creek yet to be built. Project officials insisted the road would still be finished by mid-January, after scrounging up another $25k to pay for building it. Half of this money was a donation by Simon Benson, the Portland timber baron and philanthopist. The article explained the new road segment would pass perhaps four or five waterfalls and would be a new highlight of the highway when complete. This was followed by "Cut-Off Through Wonderland of Lower Highway is Now Being Completed Rapidly by Crews, who are Being Paid by S. Benson"December 10th. The article focuses on on Benson's recent donation, and the fact that he had once lived in a tiny cabin in the area when he was young, penniless, and just getting started in the logging industry, which is one of those rags-to-riches stories newspapers have always loved. It mentions he was planning to acquire the land around the old Oregon Lumber Company mill at Beaver Falls and donate it as a park. The article includes several photos, including one of the falls, which at the time were clearly visible from the (still-unpaved) road because the surrounding area had been clearcut quite recently. The article also mentions "Twin Falls" two miles upstream, which I think refers to today's Upper Beaver Falls, unless there's another waterfall upstream that everybody's forgotten about, which is also possible.

An August 1917 article, again by Moores, compared the Lower Columbia Highway to a route further south (present-day Highway 6) as ways to get to and from Astoria, by driving both in a shiny new Hudson Super Six. Moores claimed the Lower Columbia route was shorter -- which it might still be if you're headed to Gearhart -- but the route through the coast range was more scenic, which may also still be true when you aren't being tailgated by angry bros in Porsches, or stuck behind a lumbering RV. The article notes in passing that the Beaver Creek segment was still under construction at this point due to various unfinished bridges. A brief note on March 24th 1918 noted that the state had rejected a bid to build one of the planned Beaver Creek bridges for $6483.60 ($111,252.14 in 2020 dollars) and would go ahead and build it themselves instead.

Moores left the the paper in November 1917 to become private secretary to the governor; he had somehow found time to work his way through law school despite his day job driving all over the Northwest, and passed the bar exam in May. He later went into real estate -- his original beat at the Oregonian before the auto craze hit -- and later ran the Portland Housing Authority during WWII as it built the temporary shipyard housing at Vanport.

Meanwhile the vacant auto editor role, and the "Is the road finished yet?" beat, was taken over by L.H. Gregory, who spent a few years doing this early in his long career. Gregory continued the existing theme: Hitch a ride to Astoria and back in one of the year's hottest new cars, courtesy of a local dealership, take some photos, write another piece about current conditions along the road and any quirky stories or misadventures that occurred along the way. In that spirit, Gregory made the journey in May 1918 in a Series Nine Franklin Six -- Franklin being a small maker of quirky air-cooled cars out of Syracuse, NY. He announced that the road was open, even though they were on detour routes almost the entire distance west of Delena; no progress had been made on the long-delayed Beaver Creek bridges over the winter due to high water. I had to reread the article before realizing he meant the road was open for the season after being impassable all winter, not that it was complete. Gregory called the Franklin "a wonderful road car" and overall seems to have had a great time on this trip, marred only by his companions' complete inability to catch any fish anywhere along the way. (Incidentally, after Franklin went bankrupt in the Depression, the factory was taken over and made Carrier air conditioners until 2011, at which point the plant was demolished and the jobs shipped overseas.)

A June 30th 1918 article informs the reader that the journey to Astoria -- the other of Oregon's "two chief cities", as the article puts it -- could also be made in a Willys Six. The article starts boldly, announcing once again that that the road to Astoria was now open, but quickly gets to the qualifiers: It was not actually complete, despite being open, nor was it officially open yet, despite the grand festivities of summer 1915, and as it turns out "complete" did not necessarily mean the road had been paved or even macadamized (i.e. given the modern gravel road treatment.), though these gaps were no more than 7 or 8 miles and should be closed soon. The article advises readers to avoid the Delena-to-Clatskanie segment because the road right at Beaver Falls was still under heavy construction work, and motorists were being detoured around that spot on a steep, harrowing logging road. This detailed description of what not to do tells us that the writer's party did precisely what the reader is told not to attempt. We are also told the car's owner was a bit of a daredevil, and enjoyed driving around with a hole punched into his muffler to make his car sound faster. At a few points along the road, bystanders scattered as the car approached, and yelled and gestured as it rumbled by at 35mph. The Oregonian, as a family newspaper, did not record what these people were yelling.

"To Clatsop Crest, Lower Columbia Highway, in a Buick", April 20th 1919. In which the Gregory tagged along with a rep from the local Buick dealer, who had called in for advice on a nice Sunday drive, one that was obscure and people probably hadn't heard of, because Portland. They only went as far as Clatsop Crest, as the road continuing on to Astoria was known to be impassable when wet, which was a significant problem as Astoria averages ~191 rainy days per year, and ~18 rainy days in April. The Beaver Creek segment must have finally been open, at least, as the article included photos of both Beaver Falls and Little Jack Falls, the latter with the rep's shiny new Buick parked in front. Gregory mistakenly identified Beaver Creek as the Clatskanie River, but seemed to like what he saw, describing Beaver Falls as both a "Yellowstone Falls in miniature" and "a very baby Niagara", and stating that anyone who could drive by without at least stopping for ten minutes should be barred from the highway forever. The only mishap along the way came later near the Clatsop County line, as the car slipped off some wooden planks and sank up to its axles in deep mud, where a submerged plank full of nails ripped up one of the car's tires. A passing motorist noted that county officials had known about the mud pit since at least the previous November but had not done anything about it, speculating that it was "to show what could be done with a mudhole of that kind, or to spite Clatsop County, 100 yards away".

On August 31st, 1919, readers were treated to at least two accounts of driving to Astoria and back; in one article, two guys in a Mercer (a fast, sleek sports car by 1919 standards) set a new record, making it out to Astoria in 3 hours, 50 minutes, beating the old record by ten minutes. They were slowed down somewhat by two flat tires and what sounds like the same construction detour near Beaver Falls that the paper had complained about a year earlier. Seems that at this point the steep, harrowing logging road had a temporary road surface made of haphazardly laid wooden fence rails. In the second article, Gregory made the now-familiar journey once again, this time in a shiny new Chalmers, driven by the local Chalmers rep, along with their spouses and an artist from the paper who drew another route map for the article. In addition to the unpleasant detour, they also had contend with multiple black cats in the road -- which they gingerly shooed out of the way -- and then they inexplicably ran out of gas way out in the middle of nowhere, even though the Chalmers rep swore up and down that he'd filled the tank the night before.

From there we skip past winter again to February 1920, when paving was finally about to begin along the Beaver Creek section of highway. While paving work slogged along, Gregory did the Astoria run in June in another Franklin, and again in July in a Mitchell Scout. I'm not clear on whether that model would have been an infamous "Drunken Mitchell" -- the company wanted a more sleek and modern look, and angled the radiator by a few degrees, which scandalized the motoring public of 1920 for some reason. Having your car nicknamed "drunken" in the year Prohibition went into effect was probably not great from a marketing standpoint; the company backtracked in the next year's model, but the damage was done and they were out of business by 1923. Anyway, the July article mostly talks about the inland route to Astoria, today's OR 202, and laments that readers needed to go see it within the next couple of years as timber companies were already busy clearcutting adjacent forests right up to the road, with no laws on the books to stop them.

In the midst of all of this, a September 11th 1920 article discussed a proposal to buy Beaver Falls and the surrounding old mill site as a park. As I mentioned earlier, it's a county park now, and I've seen mentions of it being a park at least back to the early 1980s, but I still haven't figured out whether it's been a park for the entire time the road's been there.

"Hot Stuff Going Down on the Lower Columbia Highway", September 12th 1920, published exactly 100 years before I wrote this paragraph. In which Gregory hopped in a shiny new Hupmobile, piloted by the local Hupmobile dealer, to investigate whether the road was done yet. We're told that paving work along the route was nearly complete other than 7.5 miles of gaps here and there, and everything should be open by October 10th, weather permitting. It wasn't clear whether these gaps were the same ones mentioned in the June 1918 article. On the bright side, the under-construction bits closer to Astoria were open when road crews weren't working, and modern personal injury law was decades in the future, so drivers were free to take their chances on the freshly-poured asphalt between 9:30pm and 2:30am daily, and all day on Sundays.

You might have guessed where this was going, given the time of year and the "weather permitting" caveat. In "Paving of Lower Columbia Highway Nears Completion" (October 17th 1920), we learn that it was turning out to be the wettest winter in at least 35 years and it had rained almost nonstop for the previous month, and there were still 4.75 miles of highway left to pave, and of course October is just the start of the long rainy season in this part of the world. The article offers several more photos of the road, and another nice hand-drawn map, but not a new completion date.

That was followed by "Columbia Highway Now Open from Hood River to Astoria", November 14th 1920, which announced the road was finally complete for real this time, with almost no remaining gaps. It seems the state Attorney General had belatedly realized the Highway Commission had no authority to build roads within city limits, or to assist anyone else in any way in doing so, and ordered them to stop. Which left one block of gravel in Astoria, another at Hood River city limits, and the whole length of the road through Rainier. We know all this in detail because Gregory covered the whole route in a shiny new Jordan Six, driven by a guy with the local Jordan dealership. (Jordan was a small maker of upscale cars, largely remembered now for its revolutionary and occasionally scandalous auto ads. The firm cratered in the Great Depression, like a lot of the others we've met.) The article includes more photos, yet another cool hand-drawn map, and a "complete" list of key points along the road with their distances from Portland and Astoria. The list mentions Little Jack Falls but not Beaver Falls, which is odd but not unusual. It could be that because Beaver Falls had missed out on the big dignitary parade of 1915, maybe it had registered with everyone that there was exactly one waterfall along the lower highway, and Beaver Falls was not that waterfall, and there wasn't a second PR blitz in 1920 to convince people otherwise. Dunno.

In any case, with the completion of paving the "Astoria Or Bust" beat quickly stopped being newsworthy, and no further examples of this particular genre graced the Oregonian's pages. Meanwhile, Gregory moved over to the sports page, and remained editor and columnist there until his retirement in 1973. The Oregonian revisited the July 1920 excursion (the Mitchell Scout one) decades later on December 31st 1975 as part of their 125th birthday festivities. A 1976 article explained that the paper's original auto section had been discontinued during the Depression, and the paper's "go drive somewhere and tell us what it was like" columns were scaled back to a single weekly feature, which finally ended in 1974 with the Mideast oil crisis. In 1982 someone at the paper remembered or realized Gregory had briefly been their auto editor decades ago, and some of his original glass plate photos from 1919-1921 were exhibited at that year's Portland Auto Show.

The Oregonian did publish a captioned photo of Beaver Falls on May 7th 1922: "Beaver Creek in High Water Lends Beauty to Lower Columbia Highway"

- photo by Scott Attractive falls bordering highway short distance east of Clatskanie Tourists who travel the lower Columbia river in summer miss much of the beauty which winter and spring bring to this route. Beaver Creek, which parallels the pavement for several miles east of Clatskanie takes the steep grade in riffles, cascades and waterfalls, crossing and recrossing the highway. In winter the stream is quickly swollen with rains on the logged-off hills around it, but in summer it dwindles away to a small creek. Beaver falls, once the power site of a sawmill, but now a ruins, is oneof the most picturesque spots between Portland and Astoria. It marks the high limit which salmon trout and steelheads reach and in early fall and winter its lower stretches are favorite haunts of fishermen from the city.
The accompanying photo shows the same dam and bridge above the falls seen earlier when the mill was operating. Neither are there now, so we have the dam removal narrowed down to an, er, 98 year time window, but that's all the info I've got on that particular detail.

Mentions of Beaver Falls became quite rare after that. There's a 1934 article about the Howard triplets' 18th birthday. Seems they had been born at a logging camp near Beaver Falls in 1916, before the road was complete and it was still a fairly remote area. The triplets had 8 older siblings, the youngest just short of a year old, their mother was 40 when they were born, and they all weighed between 2.5 and 3.5 lbs at birth, were born without a doctor attending, and all survived to at least age 18. Which does actually seem kind of newsworthy, given the era. Because this happened in the early 20th century, there was this little tidbit:

Officials of the state fair board called on the Howards and tried to get their consent to exhibit them at the fair when they were only four months old but the mother refused.
One of the three lived to 1986 and still had a surviving sibling at the time.

In 1940, the WPA Federal Writers Project released Oregon, End of the Trail, a tourist guidebook covering the state's modern highways and what there was to see along them. The Rainier-to-Astoria segment still went down Beaver Creek at that point but didn't mention the falls at all. The Portland-to-Rainier segment did mention Little Jack Falls, so it's not clear to me beats why the guide mentions one and not the other.

I don't have a direct link for when Beaver Creek Road was bypassed, but Recreating the HCRH said it happened in 1955, referencing a 2008 book "Road of Difficulties - Building the Lower Columbia River Highway", which is out of print and Amazon doesn't have in stock, unfortunately.

After being bypassed, Beaver Falls largely fell off the radar, or at least it stopped being newsworthy in Portland. I did find one crime story from 1982 where campers near the falls were pursued and terrorized by a gang of drunk teenagers, causing one of the campers to fall off a 40 foot cliff. I couldn't find a followup story indicating whether the perpetrators were ever caught, or if a gang of drunk 50-somethings is out there to this day, lurking in the forest and preying on unwary tourists. Not the sort of story that makes readers want to visit the place, regardless.

And then nothing much in the paper until the article this summer, plus the handful of useful internet results I dredged up while putting this together, and now the post you're currently reading. Now, I'm not going to claim this here is the definitive page about the place, I mean, I've only been there once, for less than half an hour tops, did not interview anyone for this, etc., but I'm fairly sure this is the longest thing anybody's written about it in quite some time, largely because I kept finding interesting tidbits to add, and I don't have a grumpy chain-smoking editor to keep me from wandering off on tangents and yell at me to just finish the damn blog post already. In any case, this one was fun to write, and I hope it was at least mildly interesting to read.

Sunday, June 30, 2019

Mount Defiance

Ok, next up we're off to the Columbia Gorge again for a hike up Mt. Defiance, a few miles west of Hood River. This is the highest point in the Gorge at 4960 feet, or at least that's the most common number I've seen, though Wikipedia now says 5010 feet, based on 1988 survey data. Either way, the views near the top are incredible. This is as good a time as any to go page through the Flickr photoset above to see what I mean.

The problem is that the trailhead's basically at river level, about 130 feet above sea level, and reaches the top in under six miles, which should give some idea why the trail's widely regarded as the toughest day hike in the area. I had done this trail once before, about 25 years ago, because I was 23 and it seemed like a good idea, and I wanted to be able to say I'd done it, on the off chance I met someone who'd know or care what I was going on about. I was sore for about a week afterward. It occurred to me recently that it had been a quarter century since I'd done this, and I wanted to know whether I could still do it -- because this is the sort of thought that occurs to you a lot in your late 40s -- and I was annoyed at 23-year-old me for not bringing a camera last time (which would have been a clunky old film camera, because 25 years ago). And truth be told, I did it because I'd originally planned to do the Larch Mountain Trail but left too late, and the Multnomah Falls parking lot was full & closed off when I got there, and for some reason this seemed like a reasonable Plan B. Once again I was sore for about a week, but I pulled it off, and now I'm set for another 25 years or so, I guess.

Anyway, the trail starts at the Starvation Creek rest area off I-84. A short path takes you to Starvation Creek Falls, just steps from the parking lot. It's not really part of the trail to the top, but it seems kind of silly to skip it since it's right there. This is the first of four waterfalls you'll see during the hike, and they're all during the initial part so if you're just interested in waterfalls you can bail out early before things really get ugly. The first part of the trail follows part of the old Columbia River Highway, so it's pancake-flat and recently repaved. Along the way you'll pass Cabin Creek Falls. Eventually you'll hang a left at the "Mt. Defiance Trail #413" sign, and at first it's also flat and paved. There's even a little picnic area with benches, recent signage, and some stonework, and just beyond that is Hole-in-the-Wall Falls, which was constructed back in 1938 (long story). After that, the uphill part begins. Switchback up to the BPA powerline corridor and turn right where the Mt Defiance trail splits from the equally tough Starvation Ridge Trail (which is still on my todo list; I tried it once, a bit before I did Mt. Defiance last time, but bailed out part of the way up). Along this stretch you'll come across Lancaster Falls. It looks kind of puny from this standpoint, but apparently this is just the very bottom of a 250 foot waterfall. That's what the internet says, anyway. It seems that if you want to see the whole thing, your best bet is to pull off at the ODOT weigh station on westbound I-84 and take your photos from there. Note: I have never done this and am just taking the word of internet strangers at face value here. In any case, you will appreciate this waterfall a lot more on the way down, especially on a hot day.

After leaving the powerline corridor, it's time for steep and seemingly endless switchbacks through dense forest, typically with steep dropoffs next to the trail, and a couple of viewpoints so you can confirm that you really are making progress uphill. You're doing all of these switchbacks to get up the side of a ridge, and once you're on top of it the trail flattens out (relatively speaking) for a while, which is the little break that makes the trail tolerable, as far as I'm concerned. Then it kicks back up to Excessively Steep for Excessively Long, but this time you're going straight up along the ridge top, and there aren't any dropoffs next to the trail, so it's physically tough but mentally you can kind of do this part on autopilot. Views are few and far between, but part of the trail passes through the Eagle Creek burn zone, and there will likely be amazing views at some point once some of the dead trees fall over. The burn zone was actually a lot less depressing than it was on other recent hikes, since the forest floor was covered with flowers and other new growth. I'm sure it helped that I visited in late spring instead of midwinter. And maybe I'm slowly getting used to the Gorge's new normal, I'm not sure.

In any case, eventually the vegetation sort of peters out into a rocky area with mostly smaller, gnarled trees. This is the point where you can see forever* (*on a good day, and figuratively, not literally or mathematically) and you can start telling yourself that the last few miles were totally worth it. Looking north you can see Mt. St. Helens, Mt. Adams, and Mt. Rainier in the distance. If you squint a bit, just to the right of Mt. St Helens you can just make out even more snowcapped mountains in the distance, which far as I can tell would have to be the Olympics. This really surprised me; Google says the Olympics are 176 miles away, which seems kind of far, but it's not like there are a lot of other snowy mountains in that particular direction, so who knows?

As you approach the top there's a fork in the trail. As of spring 2019, a temporary US Forest Service sign explains that going straight ahead is the easier trail, and going off to the right is the more scenic route. I hope they continue this on the sign's permanent replacement; it reminds me of the late, lamented "Difficult/More Difficult" sign at a Hamilton Mountain trail junction. I am honestly not sure why there are two trails here; it's a bit late in the process to start picking easier trails, if you ask me. The scenic route curves around the mountain, and for the first time in the whole hike you get amazing views of Mt. Hood to the south, while to the east you can see the entire Hood River Valley and behind it the beige desert country of Eastern Oregon stretches off to the horizon.

At the very top of the mountain, you're in for a little surprise: Radio towers, humming and buzzing, fenced off, with signs warning trespassers to keep out or else, and more signs warning of RF radiation hazards. And then you realize all of this is here because there's a service road to the top, and the crazy thing you just hiked up is somebody's occasional commute. One sign even lists "Top of Mt. Defiance, Cascade Locks OR" as the summit's street address. Still, this makes for some interesting photos, so you do that for a bit but soon realize that horrible little black flies are attacking you, and it's intolerable, and it quickly dawns on you that the journey was the reward, and the real summit was the friends we made along the way, and/or it was in our hearts the whole time, and it's time to head home.

So you can head back the way you came, or take a side trail over to the Starvation Ridge trail I mentioned earlier, or -- as it turns out -- you could take another side trail heading south that goes to a different trailhead, just 1.6 miles away and 1145 feet below the summit. But, I mean, doing it that way is obviously cheating, somehow, and it can't possibly be any fun anyway, plus my city-slicker midsize sedan hates rustic gravel roads, and I'm not about to buy a giant SUV no matter how outdoorsy the commercials are. Sunk cost fallacy? I have no idea what you're talking about.

Anyway, the way down is a lot faster than the way up, but not necessarily easier, since you don't want to go too fast, especially on the sketchy bits with the dropoffs. I am still kind of amazed I didn't blow out a knee or two on this part of the hike, and your mileage may vary, and hiking poles may be really helpful here no matter how goofy they look. You might meet a few people slogging their way up the hill on your way down. I just smiled and kept moving; I was actually kind of worried someone would ask how much further it was to the top, or whether the hard part was over, since there's just no way to be both truthful and encouraging on those questions. Luckily I was just greeted with thousand-yard stares, one after another. Come to think of it, I may have been doing that myself on the way up, since my recollection of the really steep parts is... somewhat less than vivid.

Anyway, I made it down the hill and back home, this time with photos, and have now started wondering whether I need a tent, sleeping bag, and so forth. I mean, I already know I don't have that kind of free time, and I haven't forgotten what the weather's like here 9 months out of the year, but it still has a certain appeal. So who knows.